Thread 718432207

>tendies boasted about cyberpunk 2 being better on the switch 2 vs the deck
>it comes out with 540p sub-20fps
>*crickets*

nobody plays multiplats on the switch

>>718432207 (OP)
embarrassing

>>718432207 (OP)
Nintendo would shell out for better hardware if the WiiU was successful.

WiiU was as strong as a PS3/PS4 when it launched but no one bought one. Now that everyone and their grandma has a Switch, it's weird that they are still skimping on hardware; especially the screen.

>>718434735
>WiiU was as strong as a PS3/PS4

it was weaker than a ps3. ubisoft couldnt get their own open world games above 24 fps on it

>>718434735
>wii u
>strong as a ps3/ps4
lmaooooooooooooo

That aside, it was clear from the start that Nintendo was going to develop the Switch with how hard they pushed the gamepad accessory.

>>718434823
In theory it was weaker, but it was actually just GHZ e-peen measuring. PS3 ran about as well as a late 2014 phone if you want to regard processor speed as determiners. The Tri-core 1.24 GHZ processor in the WiiU was a total of 3.72GHZ at max speed, with only something like 2GB DDR3 ram, and one GB was used exclusively for the operating system. That's probably as good as it gets for anyone waving their e-peen around with numbers, because outside of that the console was fairly diverse and unrestricted in wireless options, portability and TDP (PS3's were YLOD all over the place by 2011, where Nintendo consoles never had a failure rate above 2%).

Anyway, the point I'm making is Nintendo tried to make better hardware an accessible option for consumers, but it didn't click. People just bought PS4's that same Winter, and when it became apparent that better hardware wasn't going to move units, they went back to their usual gimmicks of pushing demographics and narratives.

>>718432207 (OP)
That's still better than the deck though?

>>718435302
The TDP and the processors were not equal for all PS3s. The first generation PS3's ran very fast, but subsequent models had smaller chips, and much lower power consumption. So yeah in THEORY the WiiU was weaker, but in actual applications, you can already see that the difference was pretty large without running test benches.

>>718434735
>wild retarded tripfag has a retarded opinion
If WiiU was just as strong as the PS3 where are the games to prove it?

>>718435525
Oh well there was Starfox Zero, Bayonetta 2, I think at one point there was a Mario 3D World that launched for the console, all three of which played back at 60FPS native (though I think Bayonetta 2 had some framedrops).

>>718434735
>it's weird that they are still skimping on hardware

nintendo is so cheap they wont even give their systems decent RAM

capcom begged nintendo to give the switch more than 2GB of ram and nintendo still barely gave it 4 GB

>>718435421
Are you sure? The CP2077 is Steam Deck verifieds, so it should have better a better framerate than the Switch 2 version.

>>718435658
That's not true, the WiiU was very much a 3GHZ emulator box that ran games better than the PS3 could.

https://youtu.be/du0eEWddqVQ

>>718432207 (OP)
this is so embarrassing, my 1080ti pulls better numbers
Nintendogs, how are you OK with this???

>>718435849
>Nintendogs, how are you OK with this???
I don't play ports on a Nintendo machine.

>>718435621
Nintendo feels weird when it takes technology seriously. I want to see 120FPS Cyberpunk 2077 on their consoles, but could you imagine the outrage if Zelda TOTK still had shitty graphics on that kind of hardware? It scares me.

>>718435724
You are throwing around a bunch of platituds you don't undrestand to try and sound smart. 3Ghz CPu means jackshit for different architectures specially if fab process is different. The PS3 bottleneck was it's slip RAM/VRAM pool so games needed to be optimized for it.

>>718436331
That's not a platitude it's just basic math. 3GHZ is 3GHZ.

In theory, the PS3 was faster than the WiiU because it had more cores running at the same 3.7GHZ speed, but in real applications, that number didn't matter because PS3 was hard to code for, and also, hard to port games on.

https://youtu.be/dKYT6NzsUZQ

>>718432207 (OP)
Retard.

>>718435339
>In theory it was weaker, but

>>718436560
>That's not a platitude it's just basic math. 3GHZ is 3GHZ.
No it isn't you absolute retarded subhuman

>>718436790
A theory is just a theory until you have to apply it. That's how hypotheticals work. It's basic scientific method.

>>718434735
>Nintendo would shell out for better hardware if the WiiU was successful.
you mean the gamecube anon

that was the last time nintendo tried to have competitive hardware and even that was still held back by the lack of DVD support

>>718436893
I did forget the magic of the Gamecube, yeah. That was a swell console, especially since I just fixed mine last winter.

>>718436560
>3.7GHZ speed
are you having a giggle mate?

>>718437134
I was, until you reminded me it was 3.2 GHZ running on potentially eight cores, where one or two would be trimmed off if any were defective.

>>718432207 (OP)
I use my switch for Nintendo games and side-scrollers like Hollow Knight. I have a PC for games like Cyberpunk.

>>718437392
This. PC + Switch master race.

Nintendorks think this game is real...

>>718435849
nintendogs eat whatever their master serves

>>718437208
i just found out this trash wiiu cpu is clocked at 1.24ghz. imagine being clocked at 1.24ghz in 2012 lmao wtf

>>718438579
it's three cores at 1.24GHZ which is um... 2.48GHZ.. um... 3.72GHZ.

I'm not defending nintendo but genuinely kill yourself if you actually like cyberpunk 2077

>>718432207 (OP)
Cyberpunk is trash regardless of the resolution. That said, anyone who's buying the Switch 2 for anything other than Nintendo's 1st party games will be disappointed every single time. I don't understand why anyone would choose to get 3rd party, multiplatform games on the Switch 2. Even their big exclusive 3rd party game Duskbloods doesn't even look like it'll be that great.

>>718432383
i do on the switch 1 and will on the 2 if i ever get one
never playing cyberpoop on anything thoughever

nobody cares about your trash dating sim unc

nobody cares about your dogshit bing bing wahoo phone

>>718432207 (OP)
>laugh
Why? Sony is the one losing every single exclusive to PC, there is literally no reason to buy a PS6 anymore now that the best combo is PC + Switch,

NOOO NOT MUH HECKIN GRAPHIXS ON 5 YEAR OLD SLOPWARE NOOO IT'S OVER NINTEDOSISTERS

>>718439206
tell me moar

>>718440349
Why can't the switch 2 run 5 year old slopware tho?

>>718435849
>1080Ti
Dumb comparison
The Switch 2 uses between 5-30Watts and your 1080Ti can draw up to 250Watts. It's honestly really impressive the how power efficient the Switch 2 is given its level of performance. It's just a shame they gave it such an anemic battery.

>>718440418
I'm just pulling your leg anon, you wouldn't normally add them up like that.

>>718432207 (OP)
>quality has more fps than performance