Thread 718451018

Am I the only one who is fine with coomer games being banned?

The problem is when someone tells me ecchi games are bad and that I should play good modern games instead, all the "good" modern games they recommend suck ass too.

Probably not, lots of braindead faggots in the world.

>>718451018 (OP)
The issue is they're not going to stop at coomer games. lol

>>718451189
Why do you watch japanese cartoons?
Why do you identify with female characters?
Cut the tranime and porn, your testosterone levels will go up in a week.

>>718451018 (OP)
No, there's lots of faggots who don't mind having fiction censored because it could hurt someone's feefees in this world.

>>718451018 (OP)
>am I the only short-sighted retard
no unfortunately.

>>718451253
I don't do either of those things, what is this underage projection?

>>718451018 (OP)
I'm into paraphilia so our games aren't being sold through normal channels so it's a non issue

>>718451253
Holy mother of all projection.

>>718451018 (OP)
The issue is that once you open up those floodgates there is no limit and you just have to trust the people in charge to not then fuck over the things you like later on.
A precedent is the most powerful legal tool in the world outside of a fuckton of money.

>>718451325
>>718451307
Then why are you mad that coomer tranime shit is being banned?

>>718451325
>projection this projection that
Lmao what a loser.

>>718451380
Where did I say I was mad about it? I just answered your question that you aren't the only faggot who is fine with it.
I'm not a tech illiterate underage retard like you, I can just pirate whatever I want.

>>718451346
>>718451207
And what's the problem? Degeneracy shouldn't be tolerated. You think games like GTA would have been sold in the 50s?
We're better off without that slop.

>>718451380
>>718451429
Why are sharteens so bad at arguments?

>>718451449
You're not mad but you're calling me a braindead faggot and saying I'm projecting.
Instead of arguing like a woman why don't you pull your dick out of your panties and actually address the fucking argument.

>>718451450
pong hadnt even been invented in the 50s

>>718451513
What argument? That you are a social media reject that got brainwashed into thinking that hot bitches are bad?
You are without a doubt a braindead faggot.
Fuck off back to twitter.

>>718451525
>>718451569
Rock & Roll was seen as demonic and degenerate in the 50s.
Given how every song is about sex and drugs, just like nigger music, I have to agree.
If you want to go back to a better time you actually have to be willing to give up the degeneracy you cling to now.

>>718451513
He's right though, if you're pro-censorship of fiction you are braindead.

>>718451450
What sort of games do you think should be sold anon? What counts as a non-degenerate game to you? Do we only get to play stardew valley?

>>718451380
>Then why are you mad that coomer tranime shit is being banned?
I'm not mad about that, I'm concerned that a monopolistic payment processor can dictate whats allowed to be sold and what will come next. The fact they used an australian org that successfully got GTA V banned in their country complaining to them as a justification to flex said power is a concerning precedent.

>>718451586
>Given how every song is about sex and drugs, just like nigger music, I have to agree.
As we all know the nigs would've never done drugs and had kids out of wedlock if not for rap music, just look at africa.

>>718451018 (OP)
I'm okay with gay people becoming persecuted again because you've shown that what you do when you're handed power is make it illegal to be a heterosexual male. The 90s rhetoric about "who cares what we do in our own bedroom; we just want to be left alone" won't work again because you've made it very clear that you care what we do in OUR bedrooms.

I'm also cool with feminism being completely destroyed, including repackaged pseudo-traditionalist conservative feminism. It's a hate movement.

>>718451615
Games that don't involve committing crimes as a nigger/spic/russian, games that don't have softcore pornography, games that aren't full of gender bending tranime characters, games that promote duty to family, nation, and society.

>>718451608
If you're anti-censorship you may as well dye your hair blue. Get a fucking job and family. Don't let browns take over our nation.

>>718451645
And I'm saying nothing of value is lost by this. The government should be doing it, yes, but this is a good first step.

>>718451731
And guess who supported the rise of rap music...

>>718451769
>random seething about russians
sorry jew, not dying for your government

>>718451018 (OP)
i've never played one but i still don't want them to get censored because i think people should be able to enjoy them and it shouldn't be up to fucking credit card companies to decide what art people can and can't enjoy

>>718451586
Said like a faggot who can't get laid.

The problem is they don't care about banning coomer games, they care about having the ability to ban whatever they want. It's very easy to get into a situation where you say "yeah that's disgusting, it really should be banned" and then all of a sudden only AAA devs can make games because indie devs simply can't be trusted to not make disgusting porn games, even though it hasn't been an issue for decades.

>>718451829
It's not random, it's the plot of GTA 4.

>>718451018 (OP)
Censorship can only be a bad thing, besides if somebody lets porn ruin their life that's on them.

>>718451769
>If you're anti-censorship you may as well dye your hair blue.
So you're pro-censorship period. Well all I can say to a braindead idiot like you is please kill yourself, hopefully you'll listen and improve the world with your permanent absence. Nothing else I say to someone like you, who is fundamentally flawed as a human being.

>>718451018 (OP)
>am I the only retard?
Sadly not, no wonder everything is in ruins

>>718451890
Yes I know. I want this. I voted for this.
It should really be done by the government, not a private payment processor, but if the government won't fix society then I'll gladly welcome private companies taking the initiative.

>>718451928
>>718451937
>>718451978
If censorship is bad then why America better when it was illegal to be a communist?
Why did German society and Italy improve when Hitler and Mussolini took over?

>>718451890
Agree. Promoting nationalism and religion was banned too a while ago as promoting fascism. But now that the geopolitical situations around the world tightens ever so slightly the good old "DIE FOR YOUR COUNTRY" propaganda machines start gearing up once more.

>>718451018 (OP)
the purpose isn't to ban porn, it's to consolidate the internet in the hands of a few controllable megacorps that can then control the biggest source of information in the world

It's going to continue from there as >>718451346 says.

The one 'silver lining' is how clever, cheeky and envelope pushing creative people become when given moral busybody limits. So you'd see a lot of double entendes, suggestiveness, innuendos and a bit more fun risqueness instead of

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0lN0w5HVT8&

So mindless cum bait might go away but softcore ecchi would explode.

>>718452023
the idea of european nations in an actual war is hilarious
russia would just send a couple telegram messages to the muslims "go kill every european you see and we'll support the united caliphate of britistan" or whatever

>>718451018 (OP)
No, there are tons of retards that are fine with banks telling us what we should and shouldn't watch. Most of them are in the UK government.

>>718452153
I fully expect civil wars in france, germany, uk, ireland, russia, USA, and a couple other nations within a decade or two

I'd be fine if they took down ecchishit and pseudoporn like that gacha garbage constantly being spammed on the catalog. Actual porn games I don't see as a problem, they have their own audience and you usually don't come across them unless you specifically look for them.
But I'm also strictly against censorship because you shouldn't limit artistic expression and you shouldn't ever trust the big people with their "good causes".

>>718452270
>hates censorship
>comes to THE site that has been advocating for a return to tradition and removal of degeneracy

>>718451018 (OP)
>>718451450
They aren't targeting "gooner" games because they are gooner games. They're targeting Japanese depictions of women that will use younger-looking features as opposed to western "modern audience" uglified women that look like men in an overt attempt to psyop you into accepting trannies and psycho "girl bosses".

Seriously, does nobody else notice this? There is no such thing as hypocrisy. Just people being dishonest about their true intentions.

>>718451018 (OP)
if coomers dont have rights, then you don't have rights
because all it takes to lose your rights is to be called a coomer

all the worst moments in history were prefaced with a passive populace saying "well its not happening to me so I don't care"

>>718452462
>NOOOO MY TRADTARD HUGBOX
look at half the boards on this site cuck

>>718452462
4chan, traditional bastion of censorship

>>718452462
Should I remind you that on this site you are always just one click away from seeing anime women with skyscraper sized penises fucking each other? A few crusading morons running around don't represent the majority of the site.

>>718452473
Collective should is a christian feminist group, they hate trannies.
Not that it matters, because in a proper society they as women would not have power over you.
Instead you defend the system that allows them to even exist in the first place.

>>718452506
Everyone has rights, and those rights are defined in the letter of the law. Your liberal "inalienable rights" are violated every day. People go to prison (removal of freedom), felons have their guns taken away (right to bear arms), and you can be compelled to unlock your property even though you have a "right" to remain silent.
If the state doesn't clearly define your freedoms, then you have no rights.

>>718452571
4chan is the reason why society has gone so hard right in the past 20 years.

>>718451018 (OP)
yakuza will be banned too don't worry

>>718452629
Yes, and in the near future those boards will be banned by law. Pornography is like any other drug, it eats away at your soul and turns you into a dysfunctional member of society, which in turn makes the society dysfunctional.

>>718452640
>Collective should is a christian feminist group, they hate trannies.
Collective Shout is not where this started.

>>718452640
>you're not free unless criminals can murder without being sent to jail
pseudo-intellectual diarrhea

>>718452682
Gee, I sure hope they will ban alcohol too in the pursuit of making society better. Oh wait...

>>718452640
>People go to prison (removal of freedom), felons have their guns taken away (right to bear arms), and you can be compelled to unlock your property even though you have a "right" to remain silent.
I hope you and your family gets raped and murdered by friendly african americans.

>>718451018 (OP)
no there are a lot of group-thinking tradlarping poltards these days

>guys 4chan is totally responsible for changing society
I really wonder if any of these fags seriously believe this, especially now that 4chan is increasingly irrelevant

>>718451018 (OP)
>Being contrarian makes me very interesting
No it does not.

>>718452640
>Your liberal "inalienable rights" are violated every day. People go to prison (removal of freedom), felons have their guns taken away (right to bear arms), and you can be compelled to unlock your property even though you have a "right" to remain silent.
Yeah, but those rights have a due process in order to be stripped from you, and without that due process being properly observed, THEIR rights can be taken away instead.

Also they can't compel you to unlock your phone if it's a password. Only if it's a biometric lock. At least in USA.

>>718452749
You're the one advocating for releasing murderers on the street, liberal. I want them shot by firing squad after a short series of trials.
Better than they deserve, but they already caused enough suffering.

>>718452808
Prohibition did not cause a rise in crime, the great depression did. Prohibition was just a convenient vehicle for this to happen. You also saw people using gambling, gaming (poker, dice, etc.), and doing other illegal shit like racing cars at high speeds.

>>718452827
Calm down, bluehair. You'll survive without your tranny meds and tranime.

>>718452949
Who said we should get rid of due process? Due process should exist, but also should laws that ban porn games and tranime games.
It's not either or.

>>718453031
>tranime games
oh, I know who this poster is

>>718452952
>The entirety of my essence has been utterly consumed by partisan politics and culture war brainrot
Imagine NPCing this hard

>>718451450
They're targeting violent games too. Anything with any sort of combat. Even something as innocuous as Kirby or Mario is gonna get slammed. They'll take everything until you have nothing left to do except worship wrinkly old hags.

>>718453182
that's literally what that anon wants

>>718453217
Sounds like anon is a wrinkly old hag then

I don't play them or care if they're around but I really don't like some rich banker faggot telling me I can't buy things he doesn't like.

>>718453182
Okay. I want those banned too.

>>718453132
Having a desire to see my country heal is not "culture war brainrot". The culture is what I'm preserving.

>>718453113
Doubtful, as I rarely post on this board.

>>718453240
or a jew, but whats the difference

>>718453031
>Who said we should get rid of due process?
Your point of "your inalienable rights are being violated every day!" only makes sense sense as a point if you're using a Short-of-Nirvana fallacy, that "Well they get to fuck you over for free, so you should just make the problem worse!" Pointing out that we DO have Due Process negates this.

>but also should laws that ban porn games and tranime games.
No. Even if you make the arguments that porn is bad for you for various reasons, the law SHOULD be "ban porn" and then should be applied evenly for the betterment of society as its intended goal due to well researched information on the effects of pornography on a populace, or it should not be banned at all and be left alone for the sake of developing a the culture of that populace.

These half measures don't fix the core issue and they don't allow unmitigated development of the culture. On top of that, the specific instance you're referring to of Collective Shout influencing a payment processor to undermine the government only serves to undermine the government as stated on the tin while also controlling the narrative they like. It's not a due process, and it's not even aiming for the intended good that you want from banning porn. It's just being used as a weapon to make sure anything that goes against the messaging as a means of controlling and removing it.

You're making a fatal assumption that because it kinda sounds like a step in the direction you want society to go in, that overall it's good, when that's definitively not the case.

>>718453307
Lol
Lmao
Just wipe out the internet infrastructure in your country then

>>718452682
Porn is just a symptom, not a cause

>>718453385
The idea of "natural rights" is stupid. If your "natural rights" can be taken away by the state easily, then they were never natural to begin with.
Natural rights are you being eaten by a bear because the bear is bigger and faster than you are. The state defines laws, the state IS law. They are completely identical. Natural law is the domain of God, not man.
In liberal society, due process is a formality. In reality the legal system is highly corrupt, benefits people who can afford to litigate, and destroys anyone who can't. Due process needs authority to actually work, people who are fearful of the power the system wields and how it would be used against them if they try to abuse citizens with it.

We don't need research to see the results of pornography; Children being groomed on roblox, trannies everywhere, 40% of Gen Z saying they're gay, scat births, sex with animals,
bug chasing, interracial, child pornography.
It is plainly obvious nothing good has ever or will ever come from pornography being legal.

If you're fine with anything being banned you're a cuck and a faggot.

>>718453747
>The idea of "natural rights" is stupid. If your "natural rights" can be taken away by the state easily, then they were never natural to begin with.
The state "giving" us rights is a gentleman's agreement between the state and the people in order to maintain a society. Sure, they can literally come in and just shoot us all, but like in any situation, the second force is used by one side, then force WILL be used by all sides, and all bets are off the table and it just descends back into caveman anarchy. Since societies that use a "Government + People's rights" tend to create stronger tribes that are able to survive with higher numbers and invent better tools and strategy for overcoming issues and protecting against or attacking other tribes, it's overall better if we observe these rights than to resort back to a full Chaos-based society.

>In reality the legal system is highly corrupt
Every system no matter how massive or minor, malevolant or benign, will be gamed. Pointing out there is "corruption" is rather meaningless.

>We don't need research to see the results of pornography;
Well, we do actually. Even if it seems like it is intuitive and simple, that may not actually be the case and there could be other issues or causes, like the fact that our society is highly flooded with estrogen from a peculiarly high amount of it being flushed in the form of overabundant birth control hormones (the pill) being rampant in all water sources (What Alex Jones was talking about with "they're turning the frogs gay").

So until you can PROVE it, as much as that seems natural to me that porn would have those results, we don't know for sure and it's just an opinion that should be investigated.

All fiction should be allowed. I don't like loli shit, but I'll fight tooth and nail for lolifags because I know that putting a "line" in fiction can only lead to one conclusion.

>>718451018 (OP)
I would've been until it turned out to be woke feminazis who will ban ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING, and not based christians like the libs claimed

>>718454221
All sides? There is only one side, even in liberal America there is a uniparty that pretends they're separate. Why haven't democrats done anything if they think Trump is the greatest threat to democracy? They did more to their own, such as Alan Greenspan, than Trump.
If it is not clear who rules over you and what rights you have under their system, then you are living in an illusion of freedom where the rules are ill-defined for the purpose of exploiting you.

The only way to "game" fascist society is to have power of your own, but you are always subservient to law in such a system. In liberalism those people can buy private islands and rape children.

We can research the effects of banning it. We don't need to study what will happen when we remove something that is clearly bad for society. Same for banning opiates. Alternatives will be found for the people who need them.

>>718454221
>What Alex Jones was talking about with "they're turning the frogs gay"
its actually atrazine from herbicides turning the frogs trans as discovered by PhD, ABM (Articulate Black Man) Tyrone Hayes

>>718454513
>All sides?
Yes, all sides of any matter in which conflict arises. That statement was not specific to governing. In ANY situation where people are at a disagreement that divides them, they observe social rules to mitigate physical violence, and once one side violates any rules, all remaining sides will violate those rules.

>If it is not clear who rules over you and what rights you have under their system,
No, my rights are pretty clearly spelt out in my system and written on tons of papers and not-at-all ill-defined. Just because people are violating those rules does not make them less clear.

>In liberalism those people
*In any system.
It's not liberalism, any system will have people gaming the system. It's divorced of a system. It's human nature.

>We don't need to study what will happen when we remove something that is clearly bad for society
If we remove something that is actually good for society and we don't understand it, then we'll have a worse effect. So until you can tell me why Chesterson's fence was put there, I'll fight you tooth and nail to prevent you from taking it down.

>>718454618
I think there was another study where a frog expert (this one was white) who discovered high levels of estrogen and deduced it was from sewage in which high amounts of the female population nearby were on birth control. Could be both.

>>718451253
>Why do you watch japanese cartoons
Because I like watching cool fights
>Why do you identify with female characters
If someone suffers from a basic human issue I’m not going to ignore that because they don’t have a cock. If someone loses someone they love or struggles to succeed it doesn’t matter if they’re a man or a woman. Why are you such an autist? Is this a false flag?

>>718451586
>Given how every song is about sex and drugs
Johnny B Goode wasn’t about either of those things and it’s one of the most famous rock songs off all time. Why do you need to do this? You’re like a walking strawman

>>718454513
picrel
>>718454840
likely it is both

>>718451507
Because they’re histrionic children of single mothers that use ecelebs as a replacement for a paternal figure

>>718451018 (OP)
you're the only one who's a faggot and should khs yes

>>718451018 (OP)
I'm perfectly fine with any given platform deciding they don't want to sell NSFW games. In fact, I find it strange that Steam allows them in the first place, but that's their choice. They decide which audience and market they want to serve.
What isn't fine is when an outside group uses force to decide that these platforms are not allowed to serve this market despite it being perfectly legal.

Pro-censorship types will eventually come for 4chan (they already are in the UK). Imagine being dumb enough not to see this.

>>718455369
>Pro-censorship types will eventually come for 4chan
Based
Shut this shithole down and free me already

>>718455431
Why is it that you have to rely on the government to make things happen for you instead of just changing yourself? Are you that weak?

>>718451018 (OP)
I'm not fine with it, but I'm not distressed by it either. Life is about to get worse all around, not just entertainment. I got bigger fish to fry.

>>718451450
History is a never-ending cycle of retards "stamping out degeneracy" and then howling like banshees when the degeneracy hunters knock at their own door; they never could have seen it coming, THEY'RE not degenerates!
>You think games like GTA would have been sold in the 50s?
Your grandfather was watching snuff films in back alleys and your idea of the 50s comes from heavily propagandized commercials and poster ads. The nuclear family is a joke and introduced to wrench political power away from local clans and into the hands of factory owners and company executives. It's not legal to develop a "walkable city" in America because of automotive lobbyists.

>>718455618
Even if I left the website would still exist.

>>718451018 (OP)
Yes, now kill yourself.

>>718451018 (OP)
>>718452672
same
That'd get the Yakuza series banned and I'd make me happy

>>718455802
And you can’t fight temptation? Really? Is it that hard for you to do what so many other have done through out history and still do everyday?

>>718455431
You're here forever, as soon as this shithole gets shutdown you'll just find some other way to talk to assholes, just like us. You'll learn new things, find new ways to use the net. You're here forever, faggot. And here doesn't just mean one web site.

>>718451769
>Games that don't involve
Give an example.

>>718451018 (OP)
>>718451018 (OP)
it's not about coomer games retard. it's about making vpns illegal and requiring a government id to even open an internet browser. how low iq are you man

Say that when they start banning games you actually care about, hell they recently actually did get an indie horror deleted off steam.

>>718455871
>temptation
It's more like boredom
>>718455902
Hey, as long as the other websites don't have giant faggots running things like we do now

>>718451018 (OP)
This board is filled with retarded faggots so no youre in good company

/qa/ lost
edgyteens tongue my unwashed anus
*farts*

>>718455929
Not everyone here is stupid, anon. And I'm betting there are a lot of demoralizers pretending to be dummies to support their narrative.

>>718455939
Read a book, go for a walk, learn a language, watch YouTube videos, movies, television, play games. There are so many things you can do. You acting like this is the only solution is asinine.

>>718451018 (OP)
>Banning vidya will reindustrialise the west

>>718455990
I mean that has been recorded happening. Like when that list of “woke games” was being spammed. Everyone immediately caught onto it being a false flag.

>>718455939
>Hey, as long as the other websites don't have giant faggots running things like we do now
They do, huge giant massive faggots dude, biggest faggots you've ever seen.

>>718456054
Yep, fifth generational warfare is actually a lot of fun when you understand the meta.

>>718456115
The thing is that it’s always the same shit.
>group of deranged retards starts pushing shit
>people notice and call them out
>they hurl insults at the people that call them out and say they’re mentally ill
>someone fucks up and info gets released/someone finds info on their own
>retards go apeshit and try to bury it while saying no one should care
>streisand effect occurs and it becomes a bigger issue
>retard go full schizo and have to do scorched earth shit
>it fails and they end up outing that they were the mentally ill ones the whole time
It happened with the SBI shit as well. Like a fucking list of games on steam started it and it caused a massive shitstorm. It got so bad the mods had to take down the ip counter so the retards could samefag more effectively. And now they have bots that will immediately flag any thread that has to do with SBI and start doing damage control.

>>718456330
Yeah, just the way it goes. Only thing (you) can really do is adapt, and find new ways to get what you want. Maybe I'm just a feckless romantic dullard believing in the ingenuity of humanity, but I'm really not worried about this latest normalfaggot initiative to clamp down on freedom.

>>718451018 (OP)
Nah im in the same boat as you OP

>>718456673
>ingenuity of humanity
"humanity" is going extinct. unless you see the spark of the faustian divine or whatever in brown people, in which case our views are totally incompatible and i will see you on the field.

>>718456759
Fair enough, my own will to power doesn't let defeatist idealism shape my actions or thoughts, regardless; we won't meet on the field. My bet is on death before that occurs.

>my own will to power doesn't let defeatist idealism shape my actions or thoughts
philosophy 101 was 10 years ago anon

>>718451769
>games that promote duty to family, nation, and society.
the first games after people figured out you can do that now were space shooters
the true return to tradition would be bringing back the on-rail shooter genre and space pilot sims about killing aliens
good bait, got me to talk about video games on /v/

>>718451253
i'm fine with gta being banned because i'm not a murderer

>>718451450
Do you really think you'd survive life in the 50s?
Lol, I bet you wouldn't.

>>718457576
>space pilot sims about killing aliens
truly we must retvrn