Thread 718560789

Game of the decade.

literally nobody cares about this piece of shit outside of the porn lol

>>718561026
Lmfao the projection

>>718561287
This is an 18+ website, Jr. Don't use words you don't understand.

>>718560789 (OP)
My pastor told me that years ending in zeros belong to the prior decade, in which case I would agree with you. For the actual 2020s it is bad and has been outdone by half a dozen games already

>>718561341
Keep crying about it you retarded faggot.

>>718561570
This nigga spergin
Did you forget to take your medication?

Hard to say. I think we've had a bunch of really amazing games in the last ten years. A lot of shit, too, but many all-timers. Cyberpunk 2077 is amazing, but so is Obra Dinn, Outer Worlds, Disco Elysium and Baldur's Gate 3.

>>718561620
Shit, I meant Outer Wilds. Outer Worlds was pure diarrhea.

>>718561609
Like I said, keep crying about it you retarded coomer brained faggot.

>>718561726
Actual meltdown. You love to see it.

>>718560789 (OP)
Hey so I actually played this one and it's shit. Hope that helps

>>718560789 (OP)
more like closest thing to a TORtanic /v/ has gotten in a decade

hyped up like the second coming of Christ, got shitloads of delays and bad news that colored the catalog piss yellow, turned out completely busted at launch, became a shitposter's golden goose for a few months then everyone stopped caring about it because it's ultimately another mediocre AAA game and who cares except the few people holding onto outdated shitflinging, the actual flop was Concord but you didn't get any mileage out of that because nobody fucking cared about that game and everyone with braincells knew it was gonna suck

I like the game, but the fanbase is insufferable, that alone throws it out of the running for game of the decade. Game of the decade wouldn't have a fanbase that is so unlikable.

>>718560789 (OP)
I laughed when people claimed that poles fixed their shit in 2.0, decided to try it and it turned out to be same broken mess.

>>718560789 (OP)
It will be what GTA 6 strives to be.

>>718562693
That play time makes no sense, even with mods.

>>718562693
how tf dou get 1000 hours in this? even with the DLC. I have 60 hours and quit after doing all the side missions cause I can't stand all the talking. But seriously there's nothing to do in the game. You drive around (driving sucks) and shoot people that's literally it. 1000+ hours???

>>718560789 (OP)
This is probably one of the most atmospheric games I've ever played, but everything else ranges from "meh" to "dogshit". I really wish the driving wasn't so bad.

>>718560789 (OP)
It had the potential to be amazing if CDPR didn't go woke as shit, release a broken game, not deliver on half the expectations and didn't make the story so horribly paced despite the great characters and idea.

It also has this same dumb thing many open world games do where they give you an emergent main story where you have a pressuring issue you must resolve (You're literally dying) but then completely wreck the pace of the game by throwing a bunch of side-quests that make zero sense to go after until you actually resolve your pressing matter.

To make it worse, if you DO decide to go for a narratively sensible pace, the game ends abruptly, you lose on a ton of story information that was relegated to sidequests that by all means should've been main story missions, get a worse ending if you complete the story that way, and half the side stories feel "wrong" to do now because it feels chronologically out of sync with your characters' developments.

They made the worst possible pacing decisions - making the actual story contents be divvied into side quests that are entirely optional and not prompted to do aside from a couple, to create a fake image that the game has lots of interesting side content. Sure, it does. Because it's main fucking story content. Even Skyrim did it better with it's shit equally abrupt story because atleast side quests there are their own stories and the main story content is self contained. Phantom Liberty should've been Act 3.

Also, the fashion in this game is retarded and looks like it was made by libtard californian people, same issue as Starfield. This looks like a moronic retard's idea of what future fashion and people would look like. Everyone is vaguely brown and overly colorful clothing and hair.

The only truly good part of this game is the city, it's pretty expertly made with personality.

This CANNOT be the same people that made Witcher 3, but is sure as shit gonna be the people making Witcher 4, so fuck that.

>>718563381
Probably plays around with the photo mode and plays dress up.

>>718563497
Nah, the fashion and the brown people make perfect sense. America is now a collection of third world countries, so naturally the citizens are gonna dress degenerate and look like mystery meat.

Completely agree with pacing problems, though. You get to act 3 way too fucking fast, not to mention you hit the level cap just as fast.

>>718563381
I know people who have played Deus Ex for over 6k hours, it's not hard to believe if he actually likes the game. Hell, if you can believe it there are people who even play those shitty zelda games for thousands of hours.

>>718560789 (OP)
Lmao kys

>>718560789 (OP)
this game blows ass, go play a real rpg you homos.

>>718560789 (OP)
emm that's not GTA 6 in the picture anon

>>718560789 (OP)
Mid of the decade.

Game made for animefaggots. No thanks.

>>718564594
This is actually why it makes it great.

>>718564432
GTA 6 is made for COD nigger culture loving 12 year olds.
Cyberpunk is made for the depressed weeaboo incel who likes a good story.

>>718564636
>animefaggot thinks anime is cool
kys

>>718564690
>good story
kek

>>718564698
>anime website
You have to go back.

>>718564740
You need an attention span to play the game.

>>718564432
GTA's soul died with GTAIV.

Other anon is right, They made so much gangbuster money with GTAV Online that they have no incentive to make it anything more than a high-octane R rated Fortnite. Dan and many key GTA figures left

>>718564741
>Only argument animefaggots use to defend their pedoism
nice try

>>718560789 (OP)
If you think this game is good you have shit taste and all your opinions are wrong automatically

>>718564886
But it is good.

>>718564814
>bro forgot the existence of RD2
R* is still more than capable to shit out a masterpiece.

>>718564636
>>718564594
so is pokemon and animelosers settle for that too.

>>718560789 (OP)
wasted potential: the game

0 soul: the game

>>718560789 (OP)
It's a game for adults, no wonder why /v/ doesn't like it.

>>718564940
RDR2 convinced me they have the technical capacity to deliver on GTA6. Not thewriting, that's not the same people anymore. Many key members left.

RDR was released in 2019 man. It's been 6 years.
Cyberpunk was released 5 years after Witcher 3. Does that look to you like it was made by the same people?

>>718566017
Those "key members" you're talking about worked on VI writing as well...
Also, I could care less how the writing will be, It's bonnie and clyde type shit, I only care about gameplay.

>>718566079
You mean the story will be a tranny infested DEI woman empowerment anti-Trump pro immigration/refugee Palestinian love story with a hint of white boy needs saving latina/feminist supremacy black empowerment.

>>718560789 (OP)
I thought the main story had some really great moments but was held back by a lot of things. It's actually right up my alley but there's a lot that detracts from my enjoyment of it, namely
>story stresses urgency but also encourages you to waste time
You could easily fix this by just having people honestly say it looks fine for now and they don't know how it works or what to do with it, deteriorates over time. Less dramatic sure but it works with the gameplay.
>sandbox sim design but not actually that much to interact with or do
>irl e-streamers like that one faggot that you have to sit and listen to his dialogue on multiple separate occasions because the quest icon won't disappear otherwise and you can't kill him like almost everyone else, all of them are unfunny and ruin the immersion
>let me date blue moon ffs
>really re-evaluate what you want to do with the gameplay. As an RPG it doesn't work. Lean into the action, just make it a shooter/first person melee game like dishonored or something.

>>718563497
>Everyone is vaguely brown and overly colorful clothing and hair.
It's supposed to be an urban american dystopia so that fits pretty well honestly

I wish shitskin edgerunnerfags burn in eternal hellfire

>>718566263
back to pol chud

>>718560789 (OP)
Getting to play it on launch on a base PS4 was a trip. I even got a refund and picked up Ghost of Tsushima instead.

>>718564594
Anime website

>>718566452
/pol/ website

>>718566726
Doesn't change the fact that the game is made for animefaggots

Why does talking about this game make all the trannies seethe?

>>718565242
>It's a game for adults
no such thing

>>718566079
Well that's dumb, writing, characters and cool missions are the entire point of GTA. Literally what would it do better than other games at this point? It's not like it has great gunplay or driving either. Those are all done better by other games. Emergent storytelling and immersion is how it got popular. The Online part is the cancer that's killing GTA.

>>718567171
anon it's a sandbox where u can do shit. It has better driving than any other open world game.
It will have better shooting than any other open world action game as well. The entire point of GTA is not "cool missions" or writing. It still will be goofy and funny, even if you believe poltards saying eveything is woke now. Immersion is the most important aspect, physics, variety, customization, etc.

Online is the best thing that happened to GTA games. I'm sorry but I prefer to play content which is constantly being updated, cars being added, new missions, race tracks, etc than play a game for 100 hours and never touch. Singleplayer is vastly superior than online experience. Try getting friends and play it online, see how much better it is.

>>718566352
> It's supposed to be an urban american dystopia so that fits pretty well honestly
Yes but the fashion is atrocious i'm sorry. It's just so ugly to look at people. Fashion doesn't work the way this game tries to make it work.

And while it's obviously a dystopia, all cyberpunk settings are dystopian by conception. it's a late stage capitalism corpocracy.

Human Revolution is set in Detroit which is arguably even worse for being a brown and broken American city but the people look sensible.
The real answer is just that both Cyberpunk and Starfield were made during the woke gaming era. Now we are in the stage of phasing out woke gaming again after many of these projects spectacularly failed and drowned billions in revenue.

>>718560789 (OP)
From what I recall the gun combat was pretty stale, a good stealth game if you primarily used stealth takedowns and hid bodies in fridges or car trunks
Melee was so-so, when all the fights turn into you mid-air dashing with a katana that eventually gets old
I wouldn't say Game of the Decade, since it took 3+ years for them to patch everything to make it playable

>>718567365
*inferior.

>>718563496
>atmospheric
Bullshit. I am playing rn and it fucking sucks in that regards too.

>>718567562
It has no soul whatsoever...

>>718567365
It definitely, MOST definitely does not have better driving than Forza Horizon. What? GTAIV had notoriously obnoxious driving mechanics (I liked them thou). Gunplay is basic and auto aims.

RDR2 also has slow annoying gunplay, Deadeye breaks the game. The presentation is elite, as is the attention to detail and physics, but those are technical aspects. I'm sure those will be present still.

I just don't agree on the other points. The best regarded game is San Andreas still because it has so many cool mechanics that made it a forever-game in some aspects and a good mission structure. Online is good but its immersion breaking when everyone acts life retard grifter tryhards, like what practically do you do except buy clothes and cars and shoot people?
OK sure you can go to a strip club, maybe play a card minigame or stocks. You do those maybe a couple times and forget about it.
There's fundamentally not much to do there except for the missions, like Heists. those are were GTA shines.

>>718563640
>>718566352
The fashion sucks because it's all the same style and a handful of clothes retextured 10 billion times.
And none of them really look cool or unique, most of them are a mess.

>>718567628
Just to reiterate, even if you are right the Online is better than single player (And that's an opinion alright), I don't care. I never played GTA for online, and almost no one I know did.
Some may play it for the life sim but god help me if I ever wanna life sim living in an American urban city lol.

>>718560789 (OP)
Only zoomers like it and think it's "peak" because they have low standards, are hiveminded, and only play slop.
That and the retarded psyop of the anime and content creators saying they "fixed" the game.

>>718567628
...Forza Horizon is not an open world sandbox, it's a racing game. You can't get out of car and shoot up people. Whole appeal of GTA is its jack of all trades, and does everything pretty well.
Gunplay won't be as detailed as Counter Strike, it works for what it is. RD2 gunplay was satisfying because of physics. Dead eye doesn't "break" the game whatsoever, it is fun to use.
Max Payne 3 had very good gunplay, and Rockstar is capable of upgrading VI's gunplay.
>what practically do you do except buy clothes and cars and shoot people?
Let me think, doing hundreds of different missions. Doing heists, customizing almost anything, owning businesses, playing HUNDREDS of gamemodes with other players, like racing, boating, flying, deathmatch, parkour, stunt games, various other events... Online fucks over singleplayer any day.

Forgot about RP possibility, if you're into that. No other game does it better.

>>718567365
>Online is the best thing that happened to GTA games. I'm sorry but I prefer to play content which is constantly being updated, cars being added, new missions, race tracks, etc than play a game for 100 hours and never touch. Singleplayer is vastly superior than online experience. Try getting friends and play it online, see how much better it is.
You are a soulless low IQ cattle.
You don't even understand the appeal of the GTA, or why the focus on online is awful.
>le infinite slop
You are the reason why marketing shit products to success works.

>>718567996
I, and millions of other people are the reason, yeah. Get fucked. Gaming belongs to me, not you. I'm playing online for years now, while you're gonna play your singleplayer dogshit games and never touch it again ever. That would be 60$ for 50 hours of gameplay. I'm paying 60$ for 3K hours of gameplay.