>>718593925
If they make a map as nice looking and detailed as RDR2's then it will automatically top it because it will have cars and helicopters. If GTA 6 has actually fun missions that allow for a bit of experimentation then it will mog RDR2 into the ground.
>>718594137
This. And it also has invisible walls. I prefer islands because they're self-contained. Especially with something based on Florida I really don't give a shit. Florida being a peninsula/collection of islands is already surrounded by a shitload of water, unlike LA.
>>718592968 >there's cities inbetween nature sprawl
there's gonna be a fuck ton to due as the map is exactly like SA unlike five which was fucking terrible and had nothing to do in the baren northern part of the map
>>718594619
V making the northern part of the map empty is by design, but I agree that there isn't much to do there. But I mean, some of the most fun I had in GTA V was ATVing around the countryside and throwing shit down the mountains with those goofy Rockstar physics.
>>718595078 >>718595190
but then it no longer looks like homer
which means 6's doesnt look like bart
which means i cant joke about 7's looking like other simpsons characters
so no
>>718595184
i need bar interiors, smoking, and gambling so i can continue being a degenerate in-game after i get home from drinking, smoking, and gambling.
>>718595345
bubbly beer confirmed
gambling was shafted for gta online but rdr2 had normal gambling so maybe single player has hope
theres also a gay strip club to mod hatecrimes into
>>718592715 (OP)
I unironically think it's gonna flop.
San Andreas, 4 and 5 (and Red Dead Redemption 2) were the at the time "biggest entertainment launch of all time". GTA VI is literally nothing new and 4 and 5 and RDR2 barely moved consoles at launch. It's also missing PC so they'll just pirate it instead.