>>718639670
Nah, it sounds fake because someone would've said the name of the new way of embedding by now, and plus, this guy who is posting screencaps would've posted the name of the extension instead of just posting screencaps saying, "It's embedded." It's like saying, "This guy killed someone," but you don't say who he killed or how he killed this other person. You don't get to play the self-righteous looking-out-for-everyone card when you are not giving out any info on the thing that is supposedly illegal. That's why I think this new thing is fake.