← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 718771532

92 posts 24 images /v/
Anonymous No.718771532 >>718771839 >>718771959 >>718772562 >>718772648 >>718773228 >>718775426 >>718775594 >>718775705 >>718776060 >>718776171 >>718776682 >>718776924 >>718777067 >>718777582 >>718777664 >>718781816 >>718781985 >>718783070
>Hard locked at 60FPS
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Anonymous No.718771839 >>718783141 >>718783429
>>718771532 (OP)
Its a PC game. It's hard locked at 60 for less than a week.
Anonymous No.718771959 >>718772034
>>718771532 (OP)
MGSV is, or atleast was, hard locked to 60fps on PC as well. They might have updated it since, but I don't think so
Anonymous No.718772034 >>718772408
>>718771959
>Comparing a 2025 game to a decade old game on an entirely different engine made by an entirely different staff
No excuses now.
Anonymous No.718772408 >>718772756
>>718772034
Even back then there was no reason for it not the be able to run over 60fps. But even Totalbiscuit at the time said that as long as it never moves from that target, then it's acceptable
Anonymous No.718772562 >>718772638
>>718771532 (OP)
>implying your PC can even run it at 30fps.
Anonymous No.718772638 >>718775974 >>718777214
>>718772562
Don't worry, I can play it on PS5
Anonymous No.718772648
>>718771532 (OP)
Isn't this the kind of things that are easily patched?
Anonymous No.718772756
>>718772408
>guy that ate so much trash it gave himself ass cancer
>better listen to his opinion
your retarded
Anonymous No.718773228
>>718771532 (OP)
that's fine, i prefer playing at 60 fps anyway.
Anonymous No.718775283 >>718775535
Unreal 5 is the antichrist of gaming
Anonymous No.718775426 >>718775521
>>718771532 (OP)
Do they run the original code on a virtual machine or so?
Anonymous No.718775521
>>718775426
We're waiting to see. They claim it's a full scale remake, but everyone with a brain knows they're probably doing the same thing as the Ninja Gaiden 2 Black release. So yeah, probably the IG code with a UE5 layer on top.
Anonymous No.718775535 >>718782676
>>718775283
Nah, it's great
Anonymous No.718775594 >>718775779
>>718771532 (OP)
probably due to legacy code. It's the same game engine as the original, in an Unreal wrapper
Anonymous No.718775656 >>718775901
Its UE5, 60FPS will be the highest it can go.
Anonymous No.718775705 >>718775889
>>718771532 (OP)
It's a japaneese game developer, you really expect a proper port?
Anonymous No.718775779
>>718775594
Oblivion Remastered fixed its issues above 60hz I think, but yeah its definitely some "stuff tied to FPS" fuckery
Anonymous No.718775797
why do you don't need more?
Anonymous No.718775889 >>718782196
>>718775705
Tlou2, Concord, Intergalactic, etc were all made or will be made by american studios and they are absolutely horrific. Nice try
Anonymous No.718775901
>>718775656
That's funny considering I recently started playing The Alters which also runs on UE5 and I have had 144fps on max at 1440p with ZERO problems. How come this runs like melted butter and every other game released on this Godforsaken engine run like absolute dogshit?
Anonymous No.718775959
No bs question: why does this game need more than 60 fps?
Anonymous No.718775974 >>718776118 >>718782848 >>718783396
>>718772638
PS5 runs it at 720-1080 resolving to a 4k image with upscaling. It stays in the high 40s and early to mid 50s most of the time. Try again, PC idiot.
Anonymous No.718776060 >>718780062
>>718771532 (OP)
Why would anyone spend thousands on a gpu just to play these games at the same fps that a base PS5 can reasonably match?
Anonymous No.718776118 >>718776224
>>718775974
>It stays in the high 40s and early to mid 50s most of the time
This is a very bad thing lmao
Anonymous No.718776171
>>718771532 (OP)
Good thing nvidia just released Smooth Motion (frame gen for games that don't support it) for 40 series
Anonymous No.718776224 >>718776275 >>718778110 >>718778280
>>718776118
PC can only do it at 60fps so not much higher at all. And PS5 even maintains 60 in quite a lot of scenarios. A 5090 would even be locked at 60. Whats the point
Anonymous No.718776275 >>718776356 >>718776672
>>718776224
>It's actually good that the PS5 can't even maintain the baseline minimum for performance
Anonymous No.718776283
Is this really a negative? I see plenty of games promise 60 fps but have to downgrade and settle for 30 fps.
Anonymous No.718776356 >>718776446
>>718776275
The problem is that it is only a handful of frames away from what a 5090 can do.
Anonymous No.718776446 >>718776509
>>718776356
In no world is 10 the threshold for "a handful"
Anonymous No.718776509 >>718776575
>>718776446
>implying that 10 fps is worth spending thousands more for
Anonymous No.718776575 >>718776696
>>718776509
You seem to think you need a 5090 to REACH 60fps at 720p (Something the PS5 fails to do)
Anonymous No.718776672
>>718776275
>But a $2000 graphics card can

It's always gamers.
Anonymous No.718776682
>>718771532 (OP)
Your eyes cant even see beyond 60fps
Anonymous No.718776696
>>718776575
Actually its 720-1080 internally but resolves to a 4k image. But youd be surprised at how dogshit a 5090 would actually run a game in the real world.
Anonymous No.718776924 >>718777041 >>718777564
>>718771532 (OP)
Don't you love modern PC gaming?
Anonymous No.718777041 >>718777153
>>718776924
>all slop games
If you played any of these, you deserve the shit performance.
Anonymous No.718777067 >>718778646 >>718783120
>>718771532 (OP)
Name one reason why you need more than 60.
>much input delay
>muh smoothness
>muh monitor can do it
Not reasons.
Anonymous No.718777125 >>718777227 >>718777661
Give me the answer to 2+2
>muh 4
Not an answer.
Anonymous No.718777153 >>718777219 >>718777513
>>718777041
Name one big PC game released in the last 2 years that's not slop
Anonymous No.718777214 >>718777290 >>718777329
>>718772638
>8k support
>games still run at 720p and can't even reach 60 fps
When will the video game crash 2 happen
Anonymous No.718777219
>>718777153
PC only gets console games that are sometimes locked to 60fps anyways and GTA 6s sloppy seconds.
Anonymous No.718777227
>>718777125
3.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
Anonymous No.718777290
>>718777214
Death Stranding 2 was 1440p at 60fps. The first one was native 4k at 60fps as well.
Anonymous No.718777329
>>718777214
it's currently in the process and will likely hit a peak by 2030 along with the larger tech industry
Anonymous No.718777513
>>718777153
FS 2024
Anonymous No.718777564 >>718777940
>>718776924
>cropping out the resolution and settings
Anonymous No.718777582
>>718771532 (OP)
Why would you need more than that?
Genuinely, why would you ever need more than that for a single player game? Even for multiplayer ones you play casually, I don't see why else you would require more than 60FPS. Only comp fags use shit like 120FPS or whatever above it.
Anonymous No.718777661 >>718777686
>>718777125
3 and we add a hypthetical 1 to the result
Anonymous No.718777664
>>718771532 (OP)
The game is so poorly optimized you can't even hit 60FPS so it doesn't matter.
Anonymous No.718777686
>>718777661
i HATE physicists
Anonymous No.718777940
>>718777564
Doom runs too good at 4K ultra no upscaling so he had to crop it out to maintain a coherent narrative.
Anonymous No.718778110
>>718776224
The difference is the 5090 does it locked at 60fps NATIVE 4K and settings far higher than the PS5 is capable of even in Quality Mode.
Anonymous No.718778280 >>718781095
>>718776224
>720p 30 fps is basically the same thing as 4k 60 fps
Do consolefags REALLY?
Anonymous No.718778646 >>718778831
>>718777067
It might give you a small advantage in competitive shooting games but it's not essential at all for single player games
Anonymous No.718778831
>>718778646
This exact same argument applies for any graphical settings above the absolute lowest btw
Anonymous No.718780062 >>718781095
>>718776060
>can reasonably match?
It can't. There is more to graphics than just the framerate. There is a decent chance that somebody will break through the FPS limit, because on PC you don't have to just lie down and take whatever some retarded developer wants to do.
Anonymous No.718781095 >>718781253
>>718778280
Its 720-1080 internally but is reconstructed to produce a 4k image. Its not just 720p. And its in the 50s fps most of the time but high 40s arent uncommon.
>>718780062
Yeah and PC has to deal with hackers in multiplayer and no GTA 6. Horrible.
Anonymous No.718781253 >>718781727
>>718781095
>y-you can't tell the difference
cope hardder poorfag
Anonymous No.718781727 >>718781887
>>718781253
I didnt even say that. You cant play GTA 6 on pc on release. Cope harder, pc idiot
Anonymous No.718781816 >>718783010
>>718771532 (OP)
>slowly becomes mandatory PC gaming software
Anonymous No.718781887 >>718782046
>>718781727
Why would I want to beta test a game instead of waiting for the better, finished version?
Anonymous No.718781918
>the best we have to offer is a timed exclusivity
Anonymous No.718781985 >>718782097
>>718771532 (OP)
>Open UUUU
>Click button
>r.MaxFPS 120
Wow, hard
Anonymous No.718782003
There are zero valid technical reasons why you would ever lock the framerate to a specific value. VRR is a thing now. 60FPS is the minimum and really we should be targeting 90FPS or better these days. FIX YOUR FUCKING SHIT KONAMI

t. graphics developer
Anonymous No.718782046 >>718782113 >>718782218
>>718781887
>implying that PC gaming as a whole isnt beta testing
Anonymous No.718782097 >>718782358
>>718781985
>UUUU
Anonymous No.718782105
Developers get angry when pc players turn off the DoF and anti-soul gas.in a perfect world they want to only let you pick from their 30FPS/60FPS presets
Anonymous No.718782113 >>718782247
>>718782046
I'm beta testing your mom as we speak.
Anonymous No.718782186 >>718782245
Please explain to me why you need anything higher than 60fps
Anonymous No.718782196 >>718782332
>>718775889
Not saying american ones are necessarily any better but ok
Anonymous No.718782218 >>718782332
>>718782046
cool enjoy playing the 30 fps low settings version of the game
Anonymous No.718782245
>>718782186
only after you explain why you need any graphics settings about the absolute lowest
Anonymous No.718782247 >>718782360
>>718782113
>pc idiots hardware is worse than a ps5 and he lost so he has to divert
Never fails.
Anonymous No.718782332 >>718782516
>>718782196
Then who are you saying is better?
>>718782218
Better than nothing.
Anonymous No.718782358 >>718782683
>>718782097
Anonymous No.718782360 >>718782519
>>718782247
I'm beta testing her so hard, she will be a 2.0 tomorrow.
Anonymous No.718782516
>>718782332
>i'd rather have the worse version earlier than the better version later
are you one of those dark-skinned fellows who can't pass the marshmallow test?
Anonymous No.718782519
>>718782360
I thought beta testing was a bad thing?
Anonymous No.718782676
>>718775535
>worse than modded Xray
Anonymous No.718782683
>>718782358
>shadman
Anonymous No.718782848
>>718775974
>PS5 runs it at 720-1080 resolving to a 4k image with upscaling. It stays in the high 40s and early to mid 50s most of the time.
>Try again, PC idiot.
Anonymous No.718783010
>>718781816
>blurshit
not on my watch
Anonymous No.718783070
>>718771532 (OP)
Well that sucks but luckily we live in 2025 and I'll just add some extra fake frames on top using lossless scaling.
Anonymous No.718783120
>>718777067
Motion clarity and input delay.
>60fps on a modern display
>99.9% of people don't have access to bfi
60fps was fine on CRTs, not today.
Anonymous No.718783141 >>718783294 >>718783305 >>718783429
>>718771839
unless physics are based on the framerate
Anonymous No.718783294
>>718783141
what physics?
Anonymous No.718783305
>>718783141
but you should never do that because it's an idiotic way to develop software that has to run on a variety of platforms

right
Anonymous No.718783359
You don't need more than 60fps for non-competitive games
Anonymous No.718783396
>>718775974
That's worse than the HD version from 2011.
Anonymous No.718783429
>>718783141
>>718771839
It's 120fps at launch because you can just use framegen that you probably need for 120 anyway given how trash UE5 is