Thread 718772283

Are youtube reviewers legit as actual media?

>>718772283 (OP)
>Are shills as legit as other shills?
They're all vermin.

delete YouTube

Not Shillman for sure
>that one starfield review

>>718772283 (OP)
They are until they start getting paid off and only feel comfortable shitting on small studios or universally-panned games

gman shills is a massive turbo faggot.

>>718772621
Gman sissies our response?

>>718772692
That's literally everything that video game magazines and g4 did

>>718772283 (OP)
they're entertainers at most, if they don't have a journo license they have no ground for integrity
not that a license matters much when it comes to vidya but at least there are consequences if you're retarded

>>718772283 (OP)
Once YouTube people start getting free games they stop being objective and honest with reviews

Owned by a literal who twitter
Lol

>>718772283 (OP)
About as legit as any other video game journalist. Maybe a bit more legit even.

>>718772283 (OP)
He's a bitch for being in his feelings about it no matter the answer to your question.

>>718772283 (OP)
They're more legitimate than games media like Gamespot/IGN, I'd say. That's not a very high bar tho

>>718772283 (OP)
Are any reviewers legit?

>>718773089
Chadmatosis

youtube hasnt been a "career" choice since the adpocalypse

>>718772283 (OP)
i always hated video reviews, video recipes and so on
i don't want to sit through a 15-20 minute video to get the same information i'd get by speed reading a written web page in 3 minutes

Shillfaggot fuck you for reminding me he exists

>>718772283 (OP)
lmao this guy's content is awful. Fuck him. "I wish I got a game for free to make money from saying it looks modern and plays the exact same as it did 15 years ago". What a bum.

>>718772487
No reason for that.
Just demonetize it and watch them all crumble into dust.

>>718772283 (OP)
>are faggots legit as actual Otorhinolaryngologists?

>>718772283 (OP)
The big ones probably aren't. Remember this guy Yong Yea? His entire persona was honesty and shitting on bad practices. Then he went on to praise Cyberpunk 2077 in his review and when the game came out he kept quiet about it and released an apology 6 months later when it didn't matter anymore. The incentive is to get review copies before launch and you're not going to get them if you're not a useful whore.

>>718772283 (OP)
People who do anything for views and chase clout on the internet can't be trusted to be honest with anything

>>718772283 (OP)
Sure, why not. The "actual media" are all trash anyway, their special label doesn't mean anything. Gaming media has always been a meme even relative to other "journalists." I'm sure there are many youtubers who get more clicks on their one channel than entire media websites.

>>718772283 (OP)
Video games, faggot, VIDEO GAMES!

>>718772621
>check it out to see the memes
>comments turned off

Not watching half an hour of pure sloppa, tl:dw?

>>718772283 (OP)
Youtube reviewers are as legitimate as places like IGN.
You are free to interpret this however you want.