← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 718782893

34 posts 24 images /v/
Anonymous No.718782893 [Report] >>718783320 >>718783509 >>718783540 >>718784952 >>718785287 >>718785863 >>718786403
4:3 is for predator gamers
16:9 is for prey gamers
Anonymous No.718782976 [Report] >>718783046 >>718785040
>16:9
lol, lmao even
Anonymous No.718783046 [Report] >>718783113
>>718782976
dude are you a goldfish?
Anonymous No.718783067 [Report]
take the superior 16:10 pill
Anonymous No.718783113 [Report] >>718783354 >>718783540 >>718785040 >>718785212
>>718783046
>16:9let detected
Anonymous No.718783153 [Report] >>718783268
It's 5:4 for me.
Anonymous No.718783208 [Report] >>718783283 >>718784513 >>718785307 >>718785338
more screen is le bad?
Anonymous No.718783268 [Report]
>>718783153
Based and SNES-pilled
Anonymous No.718783283 [Report]
>>718783208
i think it has more to do with composition frog nigger
Anonymous No.718783285 [Report]
>dude wide lmao
in reality they are just cutting the vertical fov. Widescreen gamers cant look up.
Anonymous No.718783320 [Report]
>>718782893 (OP)
And how about an aberration like this?
Anonymous No.718783354 [Report]
>>718783113
>blub blub im a goldfish blub blub
Anonymous No.718783368 [Report]
16:10 is perfect
16:9 is a meme that only exists because of TV standards
Anonymous No.718783509 [Report]
>>718782893 (OP)
You can see both in your field of vision though.
Anonymous No.718783540 [Report]
>>718782893 (OP)
>16:10
I'm an evolutionary dead end i guess, but at least it's comfy.
>>718783113
>Re-Volt
Based.
Anonymous No.718783605 [Report]
>not having 1:1
lmao
Anonymous No.718784085 [Report]
We should go back to square monitors. As long as UIs are horizontally aligned, it's a more efficient use of space.
Anonymous No.718784513 [Report]
>>718783208
It's not more screen though?
It is a different aspect ratio. You can have a 4:3 display that is larger than a 16:9 one.
Anonymous No.718784952 [Report]
>>718782893 (OP)
This is wrong though. Predators would have 16:9 screens while prey would have something like picrelated
Anonymous No.718785040 [Report]
>>718782976
>>718783113
Based peak predator.
Anonymous No.718785212 [Report]
>>718783113
>forced resolution make the car look tiny
embarrassing for grafixfags
Anonymous No.718785223 [Report] >>718785979
>4:3 is balanced all around
>16:9 has limited vertical space all while corners of the screen are hardly in your actual field of vision
Fuck widescreen, it's useless for entertainment.
Anonymous No.718785287 [Report]
>>718782893 (OP)
The names say it all: portrait vs. landscape.
4:3 is more suitable for portraying people (think visual novels). 16:9 is more suitable for landscapes.
Some filmmakers use 4:3 for their films when they are low-budget and focused on just showing the actors.
There's a reason why visual novels try so many strange angles these days...
Anonymous No.718785304 [Report] >>718785675
>ywn bully your anthro gf over her 16:9 monitor
Anonymous No.718785307 [Report]
>>718783208
Lower aspect ratio gives you more screen for the same diagonal dimension, retard.
Anonymous No.718785338 [Report]
>>718783208
>more screen
a 20" 4:3 monitor is bigger than 20" 16:9 monitor
Anonymous No.718785675 [Report]
>>718785304
The whole anthro thing reduces the field of view.
Anonymous No.718785863 [Report]
>>718782893 (OP)
what's stopping you from doing this?
Anonymous No.718785886 [Report]
>1440x1080
problem solved
Anonymous No.718785979 [Report]
>>718785223
Yeah anon it's not like all movies are widescreen for a reason
Anonymous No.718786403 [Report] >>718786485
>>718782893 (OP)
Anonymous No.718786485 [Report] >>718786905
>>718786403
why is there two long dicks next to the bottom guy's eyes?
Anonymous No.718786905 [Report]
>>718786485
because it's a picture of you
Anonymous No.718787106 [Report]
I get two unique images beamed straight to my eyeballs in glorious 1:1 ratio