>>718830174 (OP)
Development of games will bleed over to the gamer, who will be able to customize the game to such a degree that he will be able to swap out all the nigger NPCs at a simple voice command prompt. A single game will change completely from player to player
>>718830174 (OP)
Better tech = lazier devs.
Ai will be the crutch they use to make low effort games and have the AI do the lifting on level design, textures, and music.
Get ready for everything to look and sound like the same slop.
Only good thing to come might be procedural dialogue in certain genres, and possible roguelike applications. Pac-Man with never ending mazes? I'm for it!
>>718830174 (OP)
Less outsourcing to third world asset farms which results in less miscommunications, more direct creative control and quicker iteration process because you don't have to schedule meetings with a dozen producers around 5 time zones.
>>718831176
Better at churning out generic slop, sure. AI doesn't have taste, it mimics. You can tell immediately when a level or quest was AI-generated vs hand-crafted. It's all soulless filler. Yeah, itโs efficient, but that doesnโt mean itโs better. Might speed up some workflows, but it wonโt save bad design or lack of vision.