Thread 718833161

This will be video game’s graphics in 1976

There was already CGI in the 70s.

Ps: we are currently matching late 90s CGI so pic rel is misleading on the current real time graphics.The ps6 will give us 2000s level CGI in real time graphics.

>>718833396
video games still take tons of shortcuts, like replacing far away 3d models with 2d jpgs. itll be a while until we have games with "full" cgi quality graphics

>>718833493
Cgi also takes a lot of short cuts. 2d animation as well.

In terms of actual gameplay we are at late 90s CGI.

>>718833161 (OP)
>"I predict that within 10 years, computers will be twice as powerful, ten thousand times larger, and so expensive that only the 5 richest kings of Europe will own them"

>>718833621
No game comes close to that pristine lighting, assuming it's possible to reach that level with dynamic lighting.

>>718833705
What games do the 5 richest European kings play?

>>718833493
>it'll be a while until anon finally decides to upgrade his potato to give developers a reason to bother making games with good graphics
ftfy

>>718833161 (OP)
Is this the artist who paints paintings to look like game screenshots?

>>718833852
The reality is you need more expensive hardware for games that doesn't look noticeable better but have worse perfomance anyway.

>>718833161 (OP)
I saw a cool short film recently that reminds me of this pic:
https://vk.com/video-4698917_456239018?to=L3ZpZGVvLTQ2OTg5MTdfNDU2MjM5MDE4Pw--
It's one of those "random shit happens for 15 minutes" types but it's actually visually engaging

>>718833852
Developers don't make AAA PC exclusives, dumbass. If they're limited by PS5 hardware, why should I have better hardware than PS5 on my PC? To play what

>>718833858
Yeah

>>718835185
Sick, I like them a lot