>>718860037
>>718860117
It not being the price you want it to be is not "anti-consumer".
For some people an acceptable price would be $99. Should Nintendo drop it to that level to not appear "anti-consumer"?
>>718860762
And now you are crying about MUH SOUL. What does it have to do with the price of Switch 2?
Sounds like you've watched to many jewtube grifters and are hiding behind Chiaki to cry about Switch 2.