Thread 718866247

We could have graphics stuck in 2005, and the games deeper than ever. Instead, we're remaking games from 2005 without adding anything meaningful, making them run worse than ever.

>>718866247 (OP)
this game doesnt even have rtx raytracing tho

>>718866472
And as a consequence, it runs even on potato laptops with shoddy emulation. Do you need more?

>>718866247 (OP)
I don't need better graphics too. I need better AI, more challenge and less hand holding.
Every modern AAA game made in the past 10 years feels like it was made for retards. It tells you where to go, what you need to do, it gives you no challenge whatsoever, the enemies are just there waiting for you to kill them, not even trying to pose any real threat, boss fights are just QTEs in most of the games and there is absolutely no reward nor feel of accomplishment after you finish just another 20ish hour interactive movie (with a shitty plot).

>>718866247 (OP)
how can you not appreciate the beautiful visuals of GT7

>>718867865
You mean a game that's barebones compared to GT4 in content, and filled with grinding out of the ass to make you pay for micro-transactions? Yeah, perfect example.

>>718866247 (OP)
The shading/complexity/etc is fine, but playing GT4 at native resolution is frustrating - just a small increase to e.g. 720p makes objects in the distance so much clearer.

>>718866247 (OP)
IMHO we've reached an ideal level of graphics with Days Gone, in terms of Photorealistic graphics, and no more evolution is needed for the next 10-15 years. We need to focus now on NPC AI and coming up with new and innovative gameplay ideas.

>>718866247 (OP)
what features would you even add to a realistic racing game other than graphics?

>>718870540
Cars, modes, better AI, CONTENT.

>>718868023
yes but this too hard plz understand ue5 more easy saar.

>>718870540
AI opponents still have a long way to go.

>>718866247 (OP)
Lol. Me? I'll stick with the classics.

>>718870602
what fucking content? FH5 has almost 1000 cars and gazillion different activities and it's still a boring collectathon after a few hours
>>718870743
AI has to be dumb otherwise people would think it's cheating or it's too hard and would drop the game

I am fine with High Stakes graphics if it means community can make tons of tracks and cars for it.

>>718866247 (OP)
Looks like ass. GT5/6 looked way better

>>718866247 (OP)
Anyone who says this didn't grow up playing on PS2s and 3s. Fuck off, zoomer filth.

>>718866472
and that's a good thing nobody needs gaytracing

>>718871981
nah. we here to stay old man

>>718867626
It’s insane how many current day games require you to download mods to up the difficulty or balance enemy hp or damage or something along those veins. Either they’re unfun bullet sponge “”””””rpg””””” enemies, or it’s just brain dead easy. I spent 3 hours looking for mods for red dead redemption 2 just so I didn’t feel like I was playing a shooting gallery with the gunfights.

>>718866247 (OP)
Visuals peaked with the 6th console generation and PC of this time.
PS2/GC visual were perfect. I take the visuals of FFXII, Silent Hill 3, WoW or RE4 over everything that came after

>>718872096
what's your hardware?

>>718872056
>red dead redemption 2
someone loves attenting feminist rallies and listening to anti white rants/pro nigger-indian commie propaganda

>>718867626
We only getting interactive, photorealistic movie games because creating games with real gameplay is incredibly difficult. Developers don't care. They target the Twitch viewer audience, who only care about "story" and cinematic presentation. Balancing a roundhouse kick in the original RE4, where you need to adjust the range, damage, and stun, is a mathematical achievement. Modern developers can't and don't want to spend all their time on something that most gamers don't appreciate or care about

>>718867626
>Every modern AAA game made in the past 10 years feels like it was made for retards
add 10 more years to it. AAA blockbusters are literally tailored for retards so I don't know what are you complaining about

>>718872250
Not high end. but still strong enough for 1440p. But most of the time I emulate old console games or play games like Baldurs Gate 2 or Age of Empires 2.

>>718866247 (OP)
You may not need them. But I want them.

>>718872567
>We only getting interactive, photorealistic movie games
I'm glad we're getting all kinds of games here, your country must be a real shithole

>>718871981
Correct, I grew up on the Mega Drive

>>718873137
Enjoy your woke slop, tranny

>>718866247 (OP)
I miss when games had a video gamy feel

>>718866247 (OP)
and the reason? because you (the market) wanted larger screen resolutions. so they had to fill those extra pixels with crap 'detailing' which sucks away all the budget and effort. you dumb ass fucking cunts.

>>718875074
>be braindead normie
>buy 4K TV
>video game's internal resolution is 480p, upscaled to 4K
>normie happy and can justify his 3k dollarino purchase

>>718871218
Because its a gay open world racing game where you spend 90% of your time racing on the same spots and the roads are too wide, the AI too braindead and the terrain so boring you dont feel like you are being challenged or like wanting to do any of the side content.
GT4 had a fuck huge car list for its time and its still really good in 2025 but what made it special wasnt just the cars but also the upgrade system and the track and event variety, the game MADE you get other cars instead of upgrading 1 car to infinity and beyond until you got bored of it. On top of rewarding you with weird cars, or cool cars, to mix up your garage.

>>718875074
i was thinking about this. i began playing some games on 720p integer for sovl reasons. and the low graphic settings actually match there. on 1440p you need to crank to high or it looks like plastic shit. decisions decisions