>>718960757
Real answer is like late teens. Only time it's acceptable when you're older is if you played as a kid and just revisit occasionally for nostalgia or you're a dev who makes an income off of it.
>>718962846
most of the "players" are cheater who's afk with multi tabs and mostly bots steal a faggot is literally botted and promote by david xerself the chief safety is literally a condo (sex game) player and most of roblox staff includes devs is troons and furries faggot
>one is specifically made for literal kids >the other (on paper) requires users to be 13 and older
Two different demographics, so what's the point comparing them?
Does Roblox break it's data down further to show how many people have actually interacted in any way in the last hour?
It seems like the kind of thing where a lot of people are just idling and that's inflating the numbers. I suppose certain steam games do the same thing.
Roblox has as many players as it does because of it's broad reach.
- It appeals to young people, the ones with the most time and enthusiasm for even shit games.
- It's playable on even cheap phones and almost all of its games are playable on mobile.
- Almost all of its games are free.
but as a reminder, a game like call of duty, which is normally #1, #2, or #3 most played on a console, is normally ranking outside of the top 20 on steam
this is while the pc is known through court documents to exceed both consoles' combined numbers in active users for call of duty
isn't that interesting how much consoles users are the minorities?