Thread 718994194

>see youtube video
>can you beat *game* without using *fundamental game mechanic*
>click video
>you can't

>>718994194 (OP)
The answer to every youtube video with a in the title or in the thumbnail is always "no".

>>718994324
but what if the answer is yes...

I don't understand why so many of these "challenge" videos are about Bethesda slop. Those games were literally designed in such a way that you can play the entire game at level 1 with no skills. How is "can you beat it without X?" and interesting premise when that's the case?

>>718994194 (OP)
>can you beat *game* without using *fundamental game mechanic*
>you can't
>plays through the game anyway frequently breaking the one rule
>dramatic music starts playing
>"BUT THEN MY FRIEND ON DISCORD DISCOVERED THIS"
>plays through the game again
>still can't beat it

>>718994194 (OP)
cant beat mario without bing wahoo it's over

>>718995010
the original mario doesn't have bing bing wahoos

>>718994324
>should the anonymous poster on 4chan with the post number 718994324 not kill himself?
No, you're correct. Please kill yourself right now.

>>718994194 (OP)
retard

>>718994920
>Can you beat Skyrim without moving?
>In order to move, I'll have to spam Power Attack to inch myself forward. But it's not technically "moving" okay?
>Oops, there's a knee high wall that I can't get over forty minutes into the video, I guess not.

decino proved you can beat Quake without carrying your weapons over between levels and 100% kill everything along the way.

>>718994920
Because they're popular?

>>718996752
>>Oops, there's a knee high wall that I can't get over forty minutes into the video, I guess not.
Good video would show you some fucked up glitch that lets you walk through walls by unrendering the area with a broken parry animation