← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 718998113

26 posts 6 images /v/
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 1:27:50 PM No.718998113 >>718998363 >>719000015 >>719002904 >>719003092
MGS_Delta_Key_visual.png md5: 10441954... 🔍
>100GB for the remake of a PS2 game
Is this some kind of joke?
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 1:29:45 PM No.718998195 >>719002986
1756100434691280.png md5: e88ff725... 🔍
No. It's also 80 dollars + tip, and runs like ass on both PS5 Pro and PC.

This is the sort of shit the AAA jeets try to shill at you, trying to undermine any and all criticism you might provide.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 1:33:40 PM No.718998363 >>718999000
>>718998113 (OP)
I don’t see how it being originally a PS2 game has any relevance to its size.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 1:47:05 PM No.718999000 >>718999041 >>719001530
>>718998363
The original game is 4 Gigabytes.
There is absolutely no valid excuse why a remaster should be 25 times larger. The UE5 and its Pajeet users just are incompetent morons.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 1:48:06 PM No.718999041
>>718999000
Delta is also 4 gb
but the crouching mechanic is just that complex that it needs 96gb, why do you think the original didn't have it
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 1:54:27 PM No.718999332 >>719002931
>single layer DVD is 4.7 GB
>PS2 games are 4.7 GB
>Subsistence re-release required 2 disc (3 if we count the movie)

>PS5 discs are 100GB
>PS5 games are 100GB

What's the problem?
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:09:46 PM No.719000015 >>719000203
>>718998113 (OP)
Hi rez textures and fast loading times come at a tradeoff.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:12:06 PM No.719000124
>old good, new bad
Yep, seems it's that time again.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:13:55 PM No.719000203 >>719000338
>>719000015
is terrible optimization the tradeoff?
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:16:47 PM No.719000337
E33 was 50gb
There's no excuse except laziness.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:16:48 PM No.719000338
>>719000203
devs be like
>you wouldn't get it okay?!
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:27:15 PM No.719000817 >>719001023
Not sure why everyone loses their shit over storage when everything is bigger, faster, cheaper by several magnitudes of it was back then.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:31:41 PM No.719001023 >>719001275
>>719000817
>faster
dont make me post the benchmarks for this game
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:36:47 PM No.719001275 >>719001453
>>719001023
Do you have reading comprehension disability?
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:40:25 PM No.719001453
>>719001275
my point is the storage size isn't justified - and retards like you are trying to justify it
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:41:42 PM No.719001530
>>718999000
>There is absolutely no valid excuse why a remaster should be 25 times larger
You're confusing remake with remaster.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:44:54 PM No.719001704 >>719002794
64824357.jpg md5: 31caf4c0... 🔍
>150GB for a 1/3 remake of a PS1 game
Is this some kind of joke?
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 2:53:44 PM No.719002220
is actually 81 gb according to people already playing the game
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 3:03:53 PM No.719002794
>>719001704
It clearly is.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 3:05:56 PM No.719002904 >>719003040 >>719003081
>>718998113 (OP)
Third world problems
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 3:06:23 PM No.719002931
>>718999332
>>PS5 discs are 100GB
>>PS5 games are 100GB
>put disc into ps5
>download 100gb anyway
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 3:07:20 PM No.719002986
>>718998195
RIP Robbie
OP 8/25/2025, 3:08:23 PM No.719003040
>>719002904
I have 2 teras and another one I could install.
It's not about the price of storage.
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 3:09:02 PM No.719003081
>>719002904
corpo bootlicker take
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 3:09:18 PM No.719003092
>>718998113 (OP)
i'll be sticking with the PS3 port, thx
Anonymous 8/25/2025, 3:18:36 PM No.719003612
>more detailed textures = bigger file size
wtf da joos did this