red dead redemption 2 ludonarrative dissonance
438765.png
md5: 50b4e036... 🔍

>option to save a guy who loudly proclaims he's a witness to the heist that has run you and your friends into another state
this is counter-intuitive to his goals in any context, arthur isn't even sick and remorseful yet... why would he ever save jimmy brooks instead of killing him? it's like if GTA IV gave you an option to spare vlad and let him leave town, the choice itself is nonsensical
I get that it's the game's intro to determinant honor choices, but it would have made more sense if you could either beat the big bar goon's head in and kill him or allow downes to pull you back (with - or + honor for either)
this is counter-intuitive to his goals in any context, arthur isn't even sick and remorseful yet... why would he ever save jimmy brooks instead of killing him? it's like if GTA IV gave you an option to spare vlad and let him leave town, the choice itself is nonsensical
I get that it's the game's intro to determinant honor choices, but it would have made more sense if you could either beat the big bar goon's head in and kill him or allow downes to pull you back (with - or + honor for either)