Thread 719136123

>they removed Eva's jiggle physics
And $80 saved.

>>719136123 (OP)
It's all so tiresome

Anyone who even considered buying this trash for a second is beyond saving.

You are trapped in a cycle of outrage.

>>719136123 (OP)
There's always something with these "remakes".

>>719136123 (OP)
That first titty jiggle is unrealistic though, but I guess virgins like OP can't tell because they never see boobs irl

>>719136123 (OP)
Nice remake goyim.

>>719136672
Yeah, it lacks weight. It'd be ideal to have a middle ground, sudden movement would make them sway, but not bounce like they're on springs.

>>719136557
you don't understand
complaining about jiggly physics online is what a mature smart person would do, it doesn't make me look retarded at all...

>>719136123 (OP)
Implants feel way firmer than regular tits, so I doubt they would do much jiggling.

>>719136123 (OP)
Yes, this is indeed a demerit, however minor.

>>719136123 (OP)
the new models / art style is a big downgrade, so is removing the color grading.

>>719137104
Nothing stopping you from buying 2 copies to make up for the one I don't

>>719136557
You're trapped in a cycle of joblessness.

>>719136123 (OP)
is Snake blind in Delta? he's not even looking at her

>>719136123 (OP)
the bottom looks so uncanny it reminds me of poorly done SFM porn

>kojimaschlop
yikes
page 10

>>719136557
You cared enough to reply so your post asking for OP to disengage from the argument has ulterior motives that you omitted from your post

>>719137236
Strange cope.

>>719136557
If it doesn't matter, why did they change it

>>719136123 (OP)
>they made MGS woke
no...

>>719136672
And females like you cannot comprehend fiction and always want "realistic " . Pathetic flat neocortex worm

>>719136672
OP = BTFO

>>719136123 (OP)
Strange how it's a trivial issue and we should feel ashamed for caring, but at the same time game devs are willing to stake their jobs, profits, and the future of their companies on it.

>>719136123 (OP)
But why.

>>719136672
Metal Gear Solid 3 is well known for its realism.

>>719136672
Is no jiggle at all more realistic somehow? I get you're baiting, but put some effort in.

>>719136123 (OP)
bigger problem is that the game runs like dogshit on basically every platform.

>>719136123 (OP)
>buying a game that’s a “Re-anything”
Lol
Lmao even

>>719136123 (OP)
Just another reason to never touch this garbage.

>>719136557
its like your cycle of dilation but less painful

>>719136123 (OP)
Other than 1 second, its all the same

>>719138568
It's Hillishills and Discordites trying to normalize this shit. Never let them make this the standard. Foul little cretens.

>>719138568
you are making a mountain out of a molehill, it is much more likely that the lazy remake that runs like shit coasting entirely on the legacy of the original is missing something minor like jiggle physics because they couldn't be arsed to actually implement something that appears in a total of like 2-3 scenes, and less a concerted effort to remove "naughty" elements from a videogame for culture war reasons.

The game doesn't even have denuvo, just pirate it if you want to play it

>>719137589
Strange cope.

>>719136123 (OP)
Can't have it offend the "women"

>>719136557
>Walk into a shop
>Every item on sale is covered in shit
>"Man everything in here is covered in shit"
>"Anon why are you always complaining about shit, that's not healthy"

>>719136123 (OP)
In all honesty the game is so lazily ported to the NINTENDO HIRE THIS MAN engine that I doubt the jeets who did it even know how to do that in Unreal. So I wouldn't get your panties in a twist over it. You shouldn't buy it because it's lazy, not because of no jiggle physics.

>>719141287
>Unreal
Or whatever engine they dropped it into, I don't care to look it up.

I've seen nobody really talk about this but the facial animations and expressions are really bad. Especially on Snake.

>>719136123 (OP)
Crazy that in 20 years we lost the technology for mirrors and soft body physics. What will we lose in the next 20 years?

>>719141629
This site.

>>719136123 (OP)
Wouldn't want to offend trannies.

>>719141629
the tech was not lost, it's just not cost efficient to bother with minor stuff like this and mirrors reflecting properly for example when game development has blown up in scope, even though they leave stronger impressions than the fact that every individual pore on someone's face is visible.

>>719137979
Lol

>>719142204
>It's not cost efficient
Not cost efficient to what, apply two fuckin jiggle bones to the rig of this character's 3D model?

>>719141629
AAA sloppa will probably literally play itself if trends don't reverse

>>719136123 (OP)
Damn how thight are those bras.
I'm pretty sure tits sag if you crawl like that.
Not that I would know.

>>719142271
It's called logic. You are lack of it as well . Stop wasting your time here

>>719138791
She is using a bra

So yes, not jiggling would be more realistic, that's the entire point of the bra

>>719143414
ask me how I know you've never seen a woman without her shirt on in real life

>>719143414
That's not true. My breasts jiggle even when I use a bra (I'm not wearing one now though hehe)

>Bras turn boobs into unshakeable boulders unperturbed by the influence of physics
What incredible technology

>>719137247
Fuck, you're right. Pathetic

>>719136123 (OP)
thanks for saving me money I was looking into getting this guess I won't be now

>>719136123 (OP)
Top looks better. Bottom looks cringey.
-The difference in face animations is most obvious reason.
-The lighting in the top vid highlights her face and thighs. The bottom highlights her shoulder for some fucking reason.
-The hair looks better in top as well.
Original developers were inspired by action movies and could develop a scene. Modern developers are uninspired hacks.

>>719142976
Why are you saving webbems of dudes' bulges in track shorts

>>719136557
While this is probably true for most /v/irgins, for me it usually goes like this
>see new thing
>"I'll wait and see if it's good"
>wait and see if it's good
>it isn't
>i save $70-80 plus tax plus tip plus trump tariff
And I move on. It's that simple.

>>719144052
>Doesn't have a folder of pictures dedicated to attractive men
You are a gay.

>>719144564
>Gaben
>attractive
Sorry man you're gayer than I could ever be, and I look at gay furry porn