← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 719211707

39 posts 10 images /v/
Anonymous No.719211707 >>719211765 >>719212167 >>719212176 >>719212206 >>719212231 >>719212437 >>719213228 >>719213396 >>719213418 >>719213654
How do you refute this?
Anonymous No.719211765 >>719211883
>>719211707 (OP)
I don't, he's right.
It would be only wrong if it was a child polymorphing into something adult.
Anonymous No.719211835 >>719211935 >>719212267
the problem is that barely anyone argues it isn't bestiality, merely it's that they find it funny. sex with a bear is funny. sex with a child is not funny (or cute).
Anonymous No.719211840
Leftists have no answer.
Anonymous No.719211848
True, however, the person having sex with the polymorphed druid IS a pedophile despite that specific interaction not being child abuse.
Anonymous No.719211883
>>719211765
of course that would be wrong, it'd be a waste of a perfectly good loli.
Anonymous No.719211921 >>719211979
>support bestiality
>condemn pedophilia
don't know what's worse
Anonymous No.719211935
>>719211835
>yeah, you like that bitch
>*smacks giant furry ass*
>RAAAAWRAWWWWRGH
>Yeah, you fucking bear slut
>RAAAAAWRGH
you're right, extremely funny
Anonymous No.719211979 >>719212032
>>719211921
>eat animal
>eat person
wow, which one is worse?
Anonymous No.719212032 >>719212851
>>719211979
>have sex with animal
>have sex with person
wow, which one is worse?
Anonymous No.719212101 >>719212176
Female age of consent: Menstruation
Male age of consent: Sperm production

God doesn't make mistakes.
Anonymous No.719212167 >>719212196
>>719211707 (OP)
If having sex with a different race isn't interracial sex, then having sex with a child isn't child abuse.
Anonymous No.719212176
>>719211707 (OP)
You don't, because he's right.
Moralfags operate purely based on consensus, and feelings motivated by said consensus.
>>719212101
This.
Anonymous No.719212196 >>719212218
>>719212167
Who's making that argument about interracial?
Anonymous No.719212206
>>719211707 (OP)
SHE even destroys any arguments given.
Anonymous No.719212218 >>719212515
>>719212196
Who's making that argument about bestiality?
Anonymous No.719212227 >>719212691
Druids don't have polymorph though.
Anonymous No.719212231
>>719211707 (OP)
why should i?
Anonymous No.719212267
>>719211835
A concept alien to nonces.
Anonymous No.719212369
Correct. You're still a pedophile for being attracted to them though.
Anonymous No.719212385
Based, hit them where it hurts.
Anonymous No.719212437
>>719211707 (OP)
Both are not morally wrong because it's an adult dude.
But both are gay because it's an adult dude, even if he turns into a woman.
The dick is touching a reshaped dude.
Anonymous No.719212515 >>719213184
>>719212218
Lots of people made that argument when BG3 came out you fucking moron.
Anonymous No.719212691
>>719212227
They don't get true polymorph, but they do get regular polymorph. Although yes, people are usually really talking about wild shape.
Anonymous No.719212851
>>719212032
in this case it is a child or attempting to mimic a child, and abusing a human is worse than abusing an animal, although both are inherently immoral.
Anonymous No.719213184
>>719212515
Never heard of it.
Anonymous No.719213228
>>719211707 (OP)
Why would I attempt at refuting something that I not only agree with but cannot?
Anonymous No.719213236 >>719213289 >>719213427 >>719213545 >>719213617
Say your GF was able to polymorph, how long would you wait till you ask her to polymorph into a child? It's OK to say never but what if she wants to?
Anonymous No.719213289
>>719213236
I wouldn't ask but I'd try to bring it up as a joke or something but initially not in a sexual way, maybe in a "If you were smaller you can do X better" way
Anonymous No.719213396
>>719211707 (OP)
wait a minute, this is dragonirian? so the faggot having a melty on every fromsoft thread talking about dragonirian was a tranny?
Anonymous No.719213418
>>719211707 (OP)
I am coining this as The Dragonirian Dictum as a fantasy trope in regards to sexual relations with shapeshifters.
Anonymous No.719213427
>>719213236
Day 1
Anonymous No.719213483
Wait, did he post this because he got mad yet again about nobody taking his "The Chinese Government has a secret deal with 4chan /v/ moderators to post BG3 threads" seriously?
Doesn't the russki know that his country loves China and they're in China's pockets?
Anonymous No.719213535
you can't polymorph into a child
Anonymous No.719213545
>>719213236
Under the premise she wanted to I would be fine with it to a point.
Past a certain point no.
Anonymous No.719213617
>>719213236
a child? never. Filly rainbow dash? immediately.
Anonymous No.719213654
>>719211707 (OP)
Well I know how you PRETEND it's not refuted.
Ignore when it was refuted near the game's release, then autistically repost it for several years after its release nonstop, then complain that the jannies have secret deals with the Chinese government when it inevitably gets deleted again for spamming
Anonymous No.719213686 >>719213793
If the moral arguments against sex with children is that they can't consent and they're not mature enough... doesn't an adult polymorphing into a child solve all these issues?
Anonymous No.719213793
>>719213686
it doesn't since you're attracted to the body type, not the person, so you are still a potentially dangerous person