>>719228605 (OP)
this is literally one of the best videogames ever created, why does /v/ not talk about it?
I even had to evade some faggoty nonsense ban to ask this question, what the hell is wrong with this board?
>>719230462
The image in the OP is an operational tactics simulation game. It's complex and not a game that many people would enjoy. It consists of scenarios where you typically command a fleet. Unless you're into advanced strategy and tactics games you won't enjoy it. I wouldn't even really call it a game. It's just a simulation.
>>719230981
interesting. I played the demo of task force admiral. it was ok. having actual graphics to look at occasionally did help a lot though.
does this one realistically simulate how chinese equipment is garbage and they're all incompetent?
>>719229847
Dude this "game" is so niche even /wgg/ (when it used to exist) didn't talk much about it. It was the only place you could discuss the game though, but that was about a decade back.
If you expect finding anybody here on /v/ of all places then you're delusional.
What got me into these kind of games was playing Close Combat II as an 8 year old and it was one of the first strategy games I ever played. Graviteam Tactics is the spiritual successor to Close Combat.
>>719232747
Command and CMANO (don't know what's the difference) aren't only naval combat. But yeah it's also a similar spreadsheet simulator. >/vst/
Oh wtf forgot it existed.
What was the point of splitting /v/ if they get forgetten and are unused. Fucking hell.
>>719229847
Modern strategic command sim is more of a /k/ topic. Be like asking about Harpoon.
You'd have a better chance of engagement talking about the old Novalogic games.
