← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 719267140

24 posts 12 images /v/
Anonymous No.719267140 >>719267252 >>719267383 >>719267730 >>719267781 >>719267839 >>719267946 >>719268160 >>719268458 >>719268707 >>719268753 >>719268754
Streamers are stealing money from devs
Anonymous No.719267226
>indie devs
noone cares, opinion discareded
Anonymous No.719267252 >>719267316
>>719267140 (OP)
I would 100% support game devs taking a percentage from streamers
Anonymous No.719267262 >>719267538
PAY INDIE DEVS
PAY INDIE DEVS
PAY INDIE DEVS
PAY INDIE DEVS
PAY INDIE DEVS
Anonymous No.719267316 >>719268160
>>719267252
this but only for indies
Anonymous No.719267383
>>719267140 (OP)
>visual novel
Make something with actual gameplay then
Anonymous No.719267538 >>719267650 >>719268240 >>719268532
>>719267262
the way the average modern day /v/ user will suddenly act vocal in support or against positions they would normally not care about purely because they saw "le ebin gigachad" or some cringe conventionally unattractive individual say it proves to me this place is overrun with normalfags

>skeb or no skeb? idk, what does le sexy hunk think of it? what does le cringey soiye-boye think of it? i need to know before i have my opinion
is absolute oversocialized normie behavior

you bitches belong on tiktok
Anonymous No.719267650 >>719268274
>>719267538
>GzXmhEjWkAAJeM9.jpg
nigger the OP is literally copy pasted from twitter, both the image and the subject
why are you expecting quality from a twitter thread
Anonymous No.719267730
>>719267140 (OP)
based, fuck game devs
Anonymous No.719267781
>>719267140 (OP)
nah, most indie games that get popular only do so because of streamers giving them free advertisment like lethal company and whatnot.
Those games are almost made exclusively for streamers
Anonymous No.719267839
>>719267140 (OP)
I highly doubt it honestly.
If someone has streamed 60 hours in a week and spent 9 hours of that week playing your game; while earning 30k in the month.
That is 30k / 4 = 7.5k/w
7500 / 60 = 125p/h
125 * 9 = $1125 for a 9 hour session playing a game?
30k is more than most of them earn.

Sounds like screeching over the 1% of streamers that get 30k+ sponsor deals.
But even so, that's nowhere near what a dev would be making from the release of the game unless it's a seething literal who indie that released a game and sold 10 copies.
Anonymous No.719267946
>>719267140 (OP)
this won't backfire
Anonymous No.719268160
>>719267140 (OP)
>>719267316
being streamed is free marketing. indie gamedevs in particular are OBSESSED with getting streamers to play their games.
it really seems like the problem with those japs is that their game isn't worth playing. it's not really a game, so being streamed fails to convert into sales in that specific case - why watch/read it for money if you can watch/read it for free? not a problem for actual video games.
Anonymous No.719268240 >>719268274
>>719267538
you only posted that because you are a contrarian
contrarianism isn't a replacement for a personality btw
Anonymous No.719268263 >>719268489
>revenue-sharing
when has communism improved anything
Anonymous No.719268274 >>719268363
>>719267650
oh i'm not, i'm not expecting anything from this shithole anymore, just whining loudly, you know... airing out my annoyance
that, and pointing out the clear evidence of this place being overrun with normalfag tourists, for the rare few who still resist that notion

>>719268240
you don't know what that means, do you?
Anonymous No.719268363
>>719268274
>for the rare few who still resist that notion
Those people ARE the tourists
The only people who refuse to see that /v/ is more newfags now than even people who knew about this website before 2016 are the newfags themselves
Anonymous No.719268458
>>719267140 (OP)
That's a good way to get people to stop streaming your games i guess.
Anonymous No.719268489
>>719268263
>ALLOW ME TO USE YOUR WORK FOR FREE OR ELSE I'LL GIVE IT A BAD REVIEW TO MY MASSIVE AUDIANCE
so paying someone for their work is communism and free gibs with a side of extortion is capitalism?
Anonymous No.719268532
>>719267538
It's hard to side with an opinion when most of the people who have it are the ugliest and most annoying people on the internet.
Anonymous No.719268707 >>719268763
>>719267140 (OP)
Unironically kinda based, only the greedy would disagree with this. You could say that simply giving them popularity is doing enough of a service, but this can be compared to people trying to commision artists they like with "exposure".
Anonymous No.719268753
>>719267140 (OP)
I'm surprised YouTube and Patreon hasn't banned the streamers who react to anime, movies, and tv shows. Those guys are literally just watching the entire movie while talking over it and they somehow get paid for it while millions of people watch them. The Patreon streamers are especially ballsy. They're literally charging people to watch them watch movies. Utterly insane. I don't know how that's legal
Anonymous No.719268754
>>719267140 (OP)
These devs also fail to understand that only the top streamers make my money doing it, most aren't even minimum wage. It's the same with onlyfans, for some reason people think that every girl can be a millionaire with no effort, meanwhile only the top % makes anything while 99% are just posting their nudes on the internet for nothing
Anonymous No.719268763
>>719268707
Tranny game and trash opinion