>>719681794
GTA6 will be another awful game hyped by the most normalfag of normalfag retards. Shouldn't the nerds on this board who play more than one game a decade (we assume, perhaps that's not the case) have better taste? Seriously.
>>719681794
GTA 6 will fail because GTA 5 has sold over 215 million copies and unless GTA 6 sells at least that many copies again, it'll be considered a flop. Just like how the Switch sold 150M units, the Switch 2 will be a flop because it'll only sell 75M units.
>>719681947
We're in 2025 and Silksong is the most wishlisted game on Steam, by far.
Its release date reveal caused September to reach record low number of game releases on Steam for that month.
>>719680739 >>719681735
Who cares? >omg think about the indie shovelware slop
You're just watching someone complain that they're unable to up their standards. Silksong being priced at $20 is an objective win for consumers and you shouldn't feel bad because other indie devs are being forced to actually produce content instead of using "im a solo dev :(" as an excuse. Cave Story and Undertale were made by practically one person.
>>719681947 >there's 500x more indie games being released every day now.
implying this means anything about sales is an agdg shitpost, and even if it mattered nearly as much as people pretend it does silksong has basically infinite visibility and that's the only thing affected by shovelware saturation like this
>>719682386
I don't get why devs go all "I need to make my shitty indie game cost 40 dollars even though individual sales cost me nothing and I'd make way more halving the price" anyways, just make a decently polished product and sell it at a reasonable price
>>719683460 >installing microsoft's shitty bloatware game client onto your pc and setting up a recurring fee you'll have to cancel
just pirate at that point retard holy shit, it's not like any money's going to the devs anyway
>>719680739 >All the biggest indie successes are cheap. Hollow Knight, Stardew Valley, Undertale, Terraria etc. >But I deserve to charge more than them for my inferior product because uhhh... I just do ok?
>>719679693 (OP)
Hollow knight was $15, those kangaroo fuckers got greedy. They know that shillsong will be a disappointment and a critical failure among both players and critics so they want to make as much money as possible asap. Those hacks.
>>719680739
Bro, just make a good game and price it fairly. Stop being a drama queen. If your game does poorly, it could be for a multitude of factors and I'm positive Silksong being $20 is highly unlikely to be one of them.
if people think your game is worth 20 they'll pay 20, people pay full price plus for absolute slop like call of duty, other game prices dont make a difference
