← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 719715706

34 posts 16 images /v/
Anonymous No.719715706 >>719716624 >>719717419 >>719717429 >>719717562 >>719717769 >>719719383
why do new gen gamers care more about new technology then the game itself?
Anonymous No.719715826 >>719727782
I dislike niggers.
Anonymous No.719715842
we need an ai board
i'd never go there but it'd clean up /v/ and /g/ nicely
Anonymous No.719716624 >>719716873
>>719715706 (OP)
>omori
like that’s any better
Anonymous No.719716873
There aren't any barriers to entry for churning out slop so mindless retards just keep making it and posting it into void.>>719716624
Anonymous No.719717419 >>719717481
>>719715706 (OP)
>thread on the left: 3 posters
>thread on the right: 3 posters
Anonymous No.719717429 >>719717525 >>719717992 >>719719249 >>719724983
>>719715706 (OP)
>art that takes multiple days to make, years of training to be able to do well
>art that takes, like a minute max to make without any training and it look better than what real artists can make
Anonymous No.719717456
.
Anonymous No.719717481
>>719717419
exactly
Anonymous No.719717525
>>719717429
>>art that takes, like a minute max to make without any training and it look better than what real artists can make
Anonymous No.719717562
>>719715706 (OP)
the ai board is full of timmies who have never gotten (you)s before AI and indians addicted to low level rule 34. They have a symbiotic relationship and feed off each other.

Actual draw threads (at least before) have artists with different interests drawing and expressing themselves, and people interested in seeing fresh art. These people eventually stop either from getting bored, moving on in their art careers, or being driven away by literal bot spam and the aformentioned indians.
Anonymous No.719717769 >>719717856
>>719715706 (OP)
is this how painters felt when cameras became a thing?
Anonymous No.719717856
>>719717769
no
Anonymous No.719717992 >>719719105 >>719719460
>>719717429
>and it look better than what real artists can make
People really believe this?
Anonymous No.719719105
>>719717992
yes
Anonymous No.719719249
>>719717429
I respect the drawfag for his craft and discipline, I treat aifag like the dirt on the sole of my shoe
Anonymous No.719719383
>>719715706 (OP)
the only people who post in that thread are retarded AIsloppers. If IP count was brought back it'll be at least 5-10 people
Anonymous No.719719460 >>719719658 >>719720063
>>719717992
Are you serious? Lets not go nuts here. Only the best artists can top this slop. The shading, lighting, and anatomy are all top notch.
Anonymous No.719719658
>>719719460
Anonymous No.719720063 >>719721071
>>719719460
no
Anonymous No.719721071 >>719721354
>>719720063
How about yes? The shading and background are particularly good. What makes this so good is that it comes with like 150 variations that you can use to pick the right angle and shit.
Anonymous No.719721354 >>719721707 >>719722279
>>719721071
i looked at this for 2 seconds and immediately noticed the fucked up highlights on the tits
and if the whole point is just "look, it's *character* with giant tits" popped into the aether by a machine that understands absolutely nothing about what makes either aspect appealing except through mathematical averages. i.e the same way a corporation understands preferences
fuck man you really should just keep your shit taste to yourself, isn't the whole point that you can just shut out the outside world? if you prefer AI to humans then stop trying to convert other humans
Anonymous No.719721613
omori a shit
Anonymous No.719721707 >>719721831 >>719723319
>>719721354
>shit nobody cares about
sorry bro, i just bysted a nut to 20 different images i just generated since you made that post but good luck on finishing your art in a week or something
Anonymous No.719721831
>>719721707
rule of thumb, the best way to show you actually don't care is to ignore the point of criticism. being passive aggressive accomplishes the opposite
Anonymous No.719722279 >>719722413
>>719721354
>noticed the fucked up highlights on the tits
You must be a real artist, because I can't see anything wrong there. I don't even know what you might mean when you say "highlights". I suppose one of AI's strengths is that casual viewers don't see the flaws.
Anonymous No.719722413
>>719722279
I think he was referring to how the lighting on the skin of the breasts does not match up with the lighting on the raincoat
not that that’s a sin, I’ve seen professional artists mess up with that too
Anonymous No.719723319
>>719721707
You could've just said you don't give a shit instead of pretending it's better.
Anonymous No.719724983
>>719717429
TRVTHNVKE
Anonymous No.719726184 >>719726896 >>719729547
You're allowed to like both. People who seethe uncontrollably at the mere thought of ai slop are just as bad as the retarded 12yo posting 30+ Dall-e produced images of Bart Simpson and Daisy Duck. The problem is that the gate of entry for ai is so low that anyone can do it, but again so it's actual pen-tp-paper art. However, the majority of them have no idea beyond asking chatgpt to produce "lady with boob, vagoo, princess peach, with a huge dong" and has no creative spark to know that out of 400 images, maybe 1 of them is even close to being 'decent'. The average ai slop poster(and to a lesser extent, the raging anti slop autist) doesn't know that they can use the image in Photoshop as a base, they don't know about inpainting, or controlnet nodes, LORAs, or anything beyond the scope of 'i type word, i get image'.
Anonymous No.719726896 >>719728850
>>719726184
generative AI is not meant to work in conjuction with traditional techniques. it's meant to make the content for you
Anonymous No.719727782
>>719715826
sonic would NEVER say that!
Anonymous No.719728850
>>719726896
I disagree.
Anonymous No.719729547
>>719726184
>The problem is that the gate of entry for ai is so low that anyone can do it

These are the true slop posters, and they get laughed out of anywhere they post, you are talking about the absolute nonsense, doesnt look good at all, only half resembles any character they tried to gen. But good AI images are fine in my book. Like using this thread as an example, on that saber picture you have that guy that had to really drill down into shit like "the shadowing didnt look right on the right breast" to even knock the picture on it being AI in the first place.