Thread 719774861

Silksong's low pricing is going to hurt other indie developers who can't afford devaluing their hard work like this.

>>719774861 (OP)
5 - small indie game
10 - indie game with interesting concepts and mechanics. AAA of indies if you will
20 - indie game that has brand recognition and could rival real AAAs

What is the ideal price for indies? 30? Lmao. Or even more??

>>719774861 (OP)
You're not selling your work you're selling your product
your labor is valueless on a passion project, the end product you put out follows market forces

>>719775158
>a passion project
If it was passion project they wouldn’t be so preoccupied thinking how much money it would make them

>>719775158
go back to your country rajeesh

>>719775006
the ideal price is the price most people are willing to pay. if i, as the customer, don't want your product at the price you're asking, then it's not worth that price, period. if you can't handle that, then close your business and apply at mcdonalds. calling yourself "indie" doesn't entitle you to charity.

Its just some side scroller that looks like it was made with flash. Whats so special about it being $20? If anything it should cost less?

And isnt it just going to be free on gamepass anyway?

>>719775341
>no argument
Found the indie dev tranny. That you put a thousand hours into your shitty NES game ripoff doesn't mean people will pay $50 for it. Your game is worth what market demand says its worth, not how many hours of your labor you put into it.

>>719774861 (OP)
There's already a thread up with a screencap of this same journoshit. At least try not to make the advertising so obvious.
I don't care what random indie bullshit devs think or say. The indie inflation is too much. Nobody is going to play these 1000+ games a month ffs. I don't give a fuck if they delayed their game so they could play silksong.

>>719775463
seethe more pajeet