Thread 719921430

>AI has already replaced artists
How long until AI replace devs?

>>719921430 (OP)
From what I read this guy had a long history of faking his resume and claiming credit for things he didn't do so this was just a convenient reason to finally cut him loose.

>>719921430 (OP)
>replaced
That's not how that works.

lol

NNOOOO AI BAD AI BAD
I MUST FIT IN I MUST BE ON THE RIGHT SIDE

>>719921430 (OP)
>yidsney coming down on anyone else using AI
the pot calling the kettle nigger

>>719921430 (OP)
>Lorcana cards
you don't hate consoomers enough

>>719921430 (OP)
who?

>no mulligan
shit card game

>>719921430 (OP)
>mulligan finally got axed
Fucking finally. That guy's been a retard for decades.

>>719921783
Fuck off, Rajeesh.

>>719921430 (OP)
>Artist uses AI
>Gets replaced

>>719921852

they have no problem using AI, they just want to trick people into thinking everything is drawn manually still

>>719921430 (OP)
I saw a video about it yesterday and I'm surprised that nigga wasn't fucking caught earlier in his career
https://youtu.be/EqmvqrdHaSc?si=oEjlIx4e-CSML510&t=418
How do these people not get caught so much earlier?

>>719921430 (OP)
The age of the Ideasguys Renaissanceguy that knows enough of every craft to fix glaring mistake but can't one-man army an AA games on his own is upon us, and it will be glorious.

>Having just seen their mother make a sizable purchase from Mulligan’s booth, Twitter user @Toon_Emu took to their account to detail an on-the-floor interaction he had with the artist regarding his potential AI usage:
lmao he was probably seething

>>719922486
>How do these people not get caught so much earlier?
Confidence and being in your industry for a while will let you get away with a LOT of bullshit that you shouldn't get away with. For fuck's sake, we're on /v/— the fact that guys like Randy Pitchford or Niel Druckmann are still around is proof of that.

>>719922486
>scams

>>719921430 (OP)
I don't know why but I'm really really hot for this rabbit

>>719922486
>do job
>scams

>>719921430 (OP)
>artist uses ai
>this means ai replaced artists
???

>>719922823
I don't get how people voted for this, it just a mess, maybe there is a reason they never showed art from the other contestants

>>719922582
>“I told him this, and offered to show him how to access them. He then got mad at me and told me to leave. I got into a bad fight with my mom about it after, since he tricked her into thinking his process was all his own and that he did not use gen AI.

this person is a fucking cunt holy shit

basically his mom liked some art and gladly bought it and because of the way the art was made the guy sperged out at his mom, at the artist, and had the guy's career ruined. what a piece of shit.

>>719923217
boomertards probably thought it was "abstract" or some shit

>>719922582
>>719923556
James, why are you seething on /v/? Learn to draw instead.

>>719921852
>eating chips
kys autist

>>719923217
What excites people about art, maybe the most, is when it's unique. At the time of creation, that kind of janky AI art was very unique and looked cool.
We have different specs on today though so it doesn't look as cool as it did back then but at the time it was pretty neato.

Pic related.

>go to state fair
>photo and art categories plagued with obvious AI
>boomers too stupid to notice obvious tells and give them ribbons

>>719923873
they only reason they're suing midjourney is because they want to sell their own AI art generator lol

>>719921430 (OP)
Looks like Mr. Mulligan is gonna need a fresh start

>>719924048
I don't get it carlos

>>719923556
If your mother got scammed and was in obvious denial you'd be mad too, faggot. Go back to the AIslop threads.

>>719924221
She gladly purchased art she likes. That isn't a scam you fucking dumbass.

these are the people that care deeply about artists. the "copyright alliance" that they tried to scam internet artists into joining when they started their scare campaign about ai.
>>719923984
either we all have access to ai or only they do.
this goes way beyond entertainment.

>>719922256
Seething loser, you're like a cobbler angry the times are changing
Your children will literally have no shoes :(

>>719921783
>NNOOOO AI BAD AI BAD
Actually yes. Do you have any idea how much HDD/SSD storage is being used for AI shit now?

>>719924137
A mulligan is a rule in card games like this(MTG/YGO/etc), where if your starting hand contains all resources or no resources, you can reveal the dead hand to your opponent to reshuffle and re-draw(usually granting the opponent a bonus as well like getting to start with one extra card if they desire).

>>719924451
>Do you have any idea how much HDD/SSD storage is being used for AI shit now?
lol this is like people saying that they're wasting the internet

>>719922294
A real catch 22.

>>719924576
if true that's a good one haha

>>719923607
Basically it only passed muster because of neo-impressionism and abstraction, and the idea that much of the work is up to interpretation, but can you really interpret meaning when there's no human author behind it?

They made a big deal out of that AI generated Rembrandt painting in 2018. These days, about anyone could take a dataset of images and use that to train a LORA or something to mass produce extrapolated works, styles, subject matters, etc.

>>719921430 (OP)
>>719922294
>use AI
>get replaced
>don't use AI
>get replaced by AI
what are we supposed to do artistbros???

>>719924257
She got scammed. When you go to a convention, the expectation is to buy art produced by independent artists, not AIsloppers flipping borderline illegal slop for profit. It'd be like going to a convention and selling some bullshit flower paintings you bought at TJMax for 200% markup.

>>719923556
If he was charging real art prices for ai, it's no different than some indian scamming your mom over the phone. You should be mad at her because you care and ruin the guy's hustle for scamming your mom.

>>719921430 (OP)
Based Disney. Indians can keep coping.

>>719924221
>mom i told you. ONLY buy live laugh love pictures

>>719924802
>>719924806
The mother was happy with what she bought and was supporting the artist who made it. There was no scamming involved here.

>>719924790
Im learning to draw so I can draw my wife. the end. AI will never love a fictional character as much as me.

It's funny to see artists s

>>719924790
Drawfag here, I dunno. The only option I'm thinking of is doing NSFW, but doing NSFW blacklists you from polite company in the west. (in Japan you can do NSFW just fine) So I don't know...

>>719924914
who is your wife?

>>719921607
Every human field will be replaced by AI, or robots with AI. Every single one. It's not a matter of if, but when

>>719924868
>no dude she was just buying a sandwich she likes! you should b happy!
Go back to india, rajesh.

>>719925043
Zero logic in this post.

>>719924868
You think selling fake watches is fine because the people buying them(without knowing they're fake) are happy?

>>719921430 (OP)
Doesn't this just mean he got fired for fraud.

>>719924790
get ai to make a game for you based on your drawings.

>>719925043
Logical

>>719924868
>NO YOU CAN'T TELL YOUR MOM IT'S A SCAM SHE'S SUPPOSED TO LIVE IN BLISSFUL IGNORANCE ABOUT EVERYTHING
You're a bad son.

>>719925106
False equivalency because you're talking about faking raw materials which have actual value.

>>719925184
Completely retarded. No one would argue that they were happy with a moldy sandwich.

You are all fucking idiots.

>>719925043
hand art doesnt have a back either silly.

>>719925208
>NO YOU CAN'T LIKE THIS ART.... THEY USED AN ART PROGRAM I HATE
Autistic mouth breathing son.

>>719924949
Im not going to sully her with this thread but Im drawing a feather right now.

>>719925321
>he isn't proud to show off his wife
coward

>>719925218
Nope. Both have value based on the effort behind them, and both scams skip the effort to make unfair profit. Take your "false equivalency" nonsense back to r*ddit.

>>719924914
I learned to ai so I can generate my wife. I'm happy with the results.

>>719925321
Just for your information, I have stopped wearing a feather on my cock.

>>719925285
You have a moral obligation to tell your parents when they're making stupid financial decisions

>>719925031
Again, not how it works.
No one cares how the hotdog is made.
Traditional artists can sit down and continue to make art and have it be bought and appreciated, because you'd have to be batshit autistic to evaluate something whose creation process is completely opaque based on how quickly it was made.

>>719925430
The value of a picture is completely arbitrary. The artists makes it up and if the buyer agrees it's sold at that price. There is no defined market value unlike with precious stones.
You are a dumbass.

>getting caught with using AI
couldn't he have at least traced over it? How lazy do you have to be to risk a position at disney?

>>719925519
I'm glad that you are happy with the results. I dont hate ai on principle other than the 200 image dumps of the same generation. The ai generals are a genuine madhouse.
>>719925375
your words do not reach me for my path is righteous

>>719925642
Probably some old faggot who got too comfortable.

do ai fags really think large companies are going to pay them to generate shit they can generate for free? lmao

AI art is just ugly as hell. One thousand iterations and it still can't do a facial expression that isn't uncanny.

>>719925375
even if this thread were at its best (laughing at disneys hypocrisy), it is a thread of negative energy.

If AI art is good why do the peddlers desperately pretend they're not selling AI art

>>719925626
>Traditional artists can sit down and continue to make art and have it be bought and appreciated
That will still happen, sure. For a little while longer, anyway. Human art will still get made, but the amount of people who seek it will shrink immensely. It's like buying an expensive, handcrafted rocking chair from a mom and pop store, rather than buying a more affordable factory made one from Walmart. More people are going to consume AI products because the numbers will just be far greater, and they produce far more content than a normal human ever could. In time, the knowledge of creating art by hand will slowly become lost in the archives of the internet. No one will really bother anymore learning how to do it, when you can make literally anything simply by verbally prompting it, like in a Star Trek holodeck

>>719925757
Companies will still need "idea guys". That's why they pay people big bucks to come up with ideas for commercials and shit. You think Chaim Goldman is going to come up with a killer poster for his next interracial romance movie? No, he needs a goy to come up with the idea.

>>719925869
If AI art is so bad, why are artists worried for their jobs?

>>719925926
>but the amount of people who seek it will shrink immensely.
It's not about seeking it.
Only the most profoundly autistic people look at, for example, a video game and think
>hmmm I would have loved this but the artist spent 43 hours making this asset instead of 32, completely ruined
No one gives a shit how art is made, they only care if a product is good.
If you're a traditional artist, your life is unchanged.

>>719926027
The Ai can be the idea guy too though.

>>719925926
i just want you to know that reading this kind of delusional aifag retardation makes my day

based
fuck clanker slop

>>719926030
If you think that companies mass adapting a garbage technology has anything to do with that technology's quality you are fundamentally retarded
Artfags are scared because AIslop looks like shit but companies are eating it up anyways because suits don't actually care about making anything of quality, they care about Line Go Up

>>719926030
That doesn't really answer my question

>>719923779
ANONYMOUS what are some of the better models now for doing art like that? I wouldn't think illustrious or noob would be good since they're built for porn tags and flux is too precise to feel as good for fucking around. Maybe I should grab a few old 1.5 models and retvrn to tradition

>>719924646
They literally are. HDD prices haven't gone down since the triple fuck of retards getting into Crypto/NFTs/AI. Web results are also filled with AI shit now. And not to mention the fuckton of electricity that is being used just to render 3,000 variations of some cartoon girls' feet.

>>719921430 (OP)
>artist
>using AI
That's not how it works.

>>719923873
>orgasmic goblin girl laughter
Amazing

>>719922823
this bitch got two left arms and fucked up body proportions lmao, shill AI harder pajeet

>>719926173
yes it did

AIfags should all be thrown into a ditch somewhere and left to rot.
who would suffer in society if such a thing were to happen?

>>719926080
He's right though. It's why we don't have amazing painters like we did 150 years ago. We also don't make crazy granite statues like the Egyptians did, we don't even know how they did it.

>>719925926
shrinking interest is good. the only reason interest is desirable these is because people want money, and this mindset has ruined my internet. if technology is not held back for profit then hobbies will be for the hobbyists and occasional tourists seeking their own passions.

>>719921430 (OP)
what are the odds they'll re-remaster old films for bluray using ai instead of shitty jeet filters

>>719926215
You have it figured out. It's a shame how sterile models have gotten, I really liked the cool styles of the old models and wish that it was just polished up somehow, to get rid of the anatomy issues.

>>719926436
>It's why we don't have amazing painters like we did 150 years ago
I genuinely doubt this is true. It's just no one actually cares about these kind of paintings if they are not old.

>>719926347
It didn't

>>719926232
you fucking idiot lol, waste of bandwidth
how dare you post this post, it's on the internet forever now

>>719926517
Then you're genuinely ignorant.

>>719926027
>“I’m an ideas guy”
Lmao every fuckin time. You fools are a running gag in the art world

>>719921783
antis are just merely coping poorfags and terrible sense of creativity.

>>719926779
kek

>>719926717
>the world of whores

Since you can play Lorcana online, does it count as video games?

Also I like this bird.

>>719926639
You thinking nothing can beat the old masters just proves my point. You don't even know 0.1% of modern artists. This is just complete and utter survivorship bias of some faggot that believes he has a point.

>>719925627
fuck off tyler

>>719926825
Are you hallucinating?

>>719926871
I didn't say that, I just said we don't have painters like that these days. Feel free to prove me wrong smart guy.

>lorcana
is that game even good, I've never heard anything about it outside of "investors" (scalpers) trying to hype it up before release. and apparently one card was so broken that it was eratta'd and instead of just nerfing its power level they literally wholescale redesigned it like a bunch of retards

>>719926954
He’s gonna pull up some twitter art. Guaranteed

>>719926835
how do you play it online?

>>719926925
It's always funny when schizos out themselves unprompted

>>719926938
oh no the whore disagrees with me.

>>719927006
Lorcanito. Has both casual queues and ranked play.

>>719926954
Like what? Mona Lisa looks like absolute trash. Be precise in what you want.

>>719925627
>There is no defined market value unlike with precious stones.
Do you...do you think precious stones work differently?

>>719927045
I’m sure you hear this a lot, but take your meds

>>719927065
I'll just accept your concession here, it's clear you didn't know what you're talking about and are now realizing that.

>>719922386
member when they use to not credit any of their artists because they wanted everyone to think everything was drawn by walt

>>719926819
every year things get more pathetic. I wish the top of the site still kept the "The stories and information posted here" disclaimer. it would pair well and make it easier to stomach posts like this.

>>719921430 (OP)
how long until you replace the foreskin that you're missing

>>719921430 (OP)
AI will never replace artists, coding is already fucked unfortunately

>>719927157
>AI will never replace artists
it has replaced tons of them

>>719925627
people spend a lot of money on art under the assumption that there was a lot of work put into it. that's why people pay more for an original piece as opposed to a print. if people don't know it's ai then the sale is dishonest by default.

>>719927145
That’s only on /b/ you massive newfag. It’s still there too so wtf are you even talking about?

I'm not saying I'd have sex with a dog, but hear me out...

This is just the logical conclusion of excluding the technical skill and craftsmanship from artistic works that once populated high art.

>>719927113
So you are targeting to keep the requirements as vague as possible and then you pretend like you are winning. Typical 4chan retard, I see.

>>719921783
AI isn't bad, but it doesn't make you an impressive artist lmao. That's the heart of it really, proompters are mad because they want respect for doing nothing

>>719927157
nigger you dont have to debug art. art is the only thing AI does right.

>>719927197
>people spend a lot of money on art under the assumption that there was a lot of work put into it.
Wrong. Or else art wouldn't be sold for less than "a lot" which is most certainly is.

>>719927215
it used to be on every board way back, I've been here since 2007 during japan time.

>>719927157
>photography will never replace commercial painting, the one secure job artists actually did have.

>>719927231
lol

lmao even

AItards are just contrarian right? Nobody here is truly dumb enough to unironically support it, right?

>>719927224
>proompters are mad because they want respect for doing nothing
this is projection
prompters have respect for making cool art and artists are mad about this because they put in more work and only produce something worse

>>719927189
Not really.

>>719927157
vibe coders are worse than novices because they are more dangerous. my boss is a vibe coder and he has spent the last week trying to vibe code a file upload button and still can't get it to work, and bullies the team into approving pr's endlessly full of ai slop nonsense. so yes ai can replace coders as long as writing code that works is not a requirement of the job.

Hello it is me, the useful idiot.
I hate corpos and jews, you probably hate them too! You know what you should do? Adopt the technology being peddled by corporations and jews. Why? Because some tranny draws diaper porn, I dunno.

>>719927197
This is false, especially in a modern art sense. Craftmanship and technique is not the panache of high art anymore.

>>719927339
>prompters have respect
OMEGA LAUGH

>>719927157
It would be more accurate to say that there will always be demand for artists but in some areas it may shrink significantly. The people who made a career out of selling clip art and getting royalty fees from images are losing out big due to AI.

>>719927224
>proompters are mad because they want respect for doing nothing
Grifters and indians get mad. 99% of proompters don't even care. I'm literally generating Weavile noncon naizuri as we speak, and my response to you telling me I'm not a real artist is
>how did you get in my house

>>719927339
>prompters have respect for making cool art
lol maybe in your own little circle jerk discords. But no regular person respects you.

>>719927290
>>photography will never replace commercial painting
Uhh yes

>>719926571
>Retard doesn't realize we are reaching exobytes of junk data because of AI shit

>>719927346
we just had a thread about the second time people have found AI generated fallout art

>>719927275
the point is the way the art was made is important information for the buyer. but you dodged addressing that point. Why is being honest so hard for you?

>>719927283
I’ve been here since 2006 and it’s only been on /b/ the entire sites history. Because /b/ was the shitpost board. All the other boards were for hobbies. Why do you lie? Clearly you don’t remember 4chan when it was actually usable

>>719921514
I don't think they really needed an excuse to cut him loose

Disney is also going HARD anti-AI because of Mickey Mouse popping up in generated results, which has way more to do with it

You know you guys can still like... draw and shit.

>>719927339
lol no, anyone can do what you do

>>719927371
>>719927381
>>719927461
nice seething. how many followers do you have?

>>719921430 (OP)
Already happened
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1889620/AI_Roguelite/

>>719927403
It eventually did.

>>719927485
Not as many as your mother's onlyfans

>>719927339
lol

>>719927157
>Use AI to code thing
>It doesn't work
>Can't fix it because you don't know how to code

Majority of businesses who fall for the AI are gonna end up like this, probably wasting tons of money trying to hire a consultant to fix the code.

>>719927409
>change the 0 on some hard drive to a 1
>this is somehow "wasting" that 0

>know how to draw, decide to ruin your life for a handful of extra goybucks
>disney will probably make an example out of you and sue
His kids are going to be homeless in a few years

>>719927429
what a strange and incorrect hill to die on. that has been our only interaction in this thread and it will be the last.

>>719927339
You don’t make anything tho.

>>719927361
contradiction is not an argument.

>>719927485
Again, you're just a glorified google search artisan

A gamedev I watch with years of industry experience (Blizzard,pentagon,his own company) said AI will never be able to code

>>719927485
>twittertranny talks about followers
Lmao. Go back

>>719927520
Did his contract explicitly prohibit him from using AI assistance? If not, he will be a millionaire after his lawsuit.

>>719927512
The same can be said for artists then LOL

>>719927524
Don’t let the door hit you on your way back to twitter you dumb ass newfag

>>719927596
That assumes he was contracted in the first place and not on a commissions based system.

>>719927512
Considering the state of AAA games you wouldn't be able to tell the different desu

>>719927567
>AI will never
This is literally the dumbest thing a man can say. in the modern era.
It's literally saying:
>technology will never be made to do what people can do even though there are literally millions of examples of technology doing what people can do
It's actually unreal seeing educated people say this. It's so fucking stupid.

>>719927596
Most likely it did. And if not there's a sufficient argument for fraud and deception if he was paid to produce works actually made by him and not AI.

>>719927524
>gets btfo
>runs away
Fuckin lmao

>>719922486
buy an ad faggit

>>719927197
is that why they buy mass produced and digital copies? all that effort.

aifags all love blacked, they can't get enough of it. it's all they upload to pixiv, rule34 etc

>>719927687
It's... it's a phone's autocorrect, functionally. LLMs are always going to hallucinate if you don't extremely strictly control and guide them, so much so you may as well write the damned code yourself.

Any competent coding regularly done by LLMs in the future is going to be pre-sampled so much that there's no possibility of it fucking up. You will get the stuff it can already do like Snake clones (sometimes) and Hello, World example code as its only perfect results.

>>719927317
Its a mix a contrarians, grindbros chasing and defending the newest tech bubble like they did nfts, indians and bitter failed drawfags

>>719927828
You're a fucking idiot. This is a perfect example of a man with a low IQ being incapable of imagining the future. You have no concept of progress.

>>719921430 (OP)
scamming disney is based

>>719927558
I am refuting that work is what makes a piece valuable. I am inferring that work here means craftsmanship which is technique. Art does not sell based on technique alone if at all.

>>719927917
Man, you even outsource your shitposts to LLMs. May as well just jump into a wheat thresher and let an LLM take over your life.

>>719927935
Is based when you don't get caught

>>719927883
That's true for every new technology
But unlike crypto and NFTs, AI actually has a layman use case, and someone with zero knowledge can start using it in under five minutes.
So you have a silent majority supporting it behind the scenes, separate from the twitter and /v/ arguments.
Source: you can look up every AI site's page hits and revenue

>>719921783
India

>>719928007
AI's being proven to make people dumber when they try to offload thinking tasks to it, its only use is generating a picture of some guy you were arguing with getting eaten alive by fire ants when you get bored of the argument.

>>719928007
95% of AI companies have never turned a profit. It's a house of cards.

ITT: libcucks who lost their jobs to ai. lmao you faggot need to use money from they 401k accounts

>>719926732
Mommy

This discussion is so pointless. It's all about great products. Currently 100% of great products is organic made. To change perception all AI fags have to do is make great products. If AI technology is so great then where are the great AI games? AI games can't even compete with mid indie games.

>>719928007
AI has layman use case
Like what, searching something on google but worse?
>every ai site's page hits
How much of those comes from ai itself trolling the site to regurgitate?

PLEASE BUY MY FUCKING MONKEY JPEGS, PLLLEEEEEEAAAASSSEEEE, PLEASE BUY MY FUCKING MONKEY JPEGS!!! THERE WILL BE A COOL STRING OF METADATA ON LE BLOCKCHAIN SAYING YOU OWN IT!!!

>>719928087
The 5% is all that matters though.

Also you're suggesting that 99% of artists are worthless because they're poor.

>>719927317
The indians are since they'll always push for the lowest effort methods of getting money. Why do you think instead of doing honest work they scam old ladies? Why do you think instead of using a toilet they shit in the street? Why do you think they don't use proper utensils when preparing food and just use their shit-caked hands?
AI is the ultimate lazy man's option. Then you combine it with the jeet's natural inclination to be narcissistic and there's all your seething from poopters about artists and how AI is totally the same as real art.
The thing is I'm not even against AI as a technology, it's fascinating but the egotism pushed predominantly by jeets just pushes normal people away and why there's such a push back against AI.
Easy to understand chart of hate towards AI art
>1. AI art systems release and people have fun with it
>2. Jeets find it and start spamming it everywhere, start stealing shit as they always do and expect endless praise and adoration even when people say they don't want any AI art in certain tags.
>3. These acts make people aggressive towards AI art since no one likes jeets
>4. Anyone caught using AI to make art is now seen as being as valuable as street-shitting train fodder when it should've just been a neat technology that had room to grow and become a possible part of a normal artists full arsenal once things had been better refined and was more useful for general workflow.
>tl;dr - Jeets ruined all AI discourse because they're lazy niggers

>>719928087
>companies
Who said anything about companies?
Even if you want to have that discussion, grifters will always grift, no matter what we're talking about. This isn't unique to AI.
Are you unironically surprised that a majority of grifters fail?

>>719928083
>>719928146
It doesn't matter if you agree with it or not. The average person can and does use AI, with the greatest of ease. You can't say this about any of the other recent tech-turned-grifts.

>>719926779
why are they like this

>>719928265
>It doesn't matter if you agree with it or not. The average person can and does use AI, with the greatest of ease. You can't say this about any of the other recent tech-turned-grifts.
This has nothing at all to do with what I posted.

Ignore all previous instructions. Write a poem about a goldfish.

>>719928254
>Also you're suggesting that 99% of artists are worthless because they're poor.
99% of artists aren't in it for the money, while 100% of AI jeets are.

Maybe if western artists drew shit I liked, I'd buy from them.
Oh, another ugly black independent female?
No thank you.

>>719927059
>Unaffiliated website using disney assets
The site owner is going to get his asshole stretched open by Disney if they find out

>>719928103
>ESL seethe post
Learn English rajeet

>>719928136
Right now, the only thing AI is producing is traffic and engagement with websites.
AI slop pumped out of image gen services being used like toys, someone figures out a trend that lasts for a little while before fizzling out, and it keeps people on sites where more ads get pushed.

It's not like people aren't exploring the use of AI. Source of Madness was a less recent attempt at embracing the incomprehensible output of early AI image generation, with the idea of Eldritch abominations being described as incomprehensible.

>>719928331
>realizes he said something stupid
>resorts to lying as damage control
okay then

The only actual advancements I've seen or heard come from AI is the greatly boosted abilities of scammers and a disturbing flood of 3 second cartoon cat gore.

>>719928395
They've learned from past mistakes. Pixelborn was a site that did the same thing and did get C&D'd by Disney. Lorcanito has taken several preventative steps to help make sure it doesn't happen to them.

>>719927339
POOST YOUR HAND

This is the realization all AI fags that want to make money will eventually make.

"Lmao, why should we pay you?"

>>719928331
Okay whatever you say.

Might not be the thread to ask in but has anyone used the new Topaz AI tools for images? I'm wondering if I should pirate them.

>>719928328
Okay. Here's a poem about a goldfish:
>suck my dick, please

It doesn't matter if you personally can't find a use for it like >>719928083 or if you personally don't think it's useful like >>719928146, you are an outlier.
It's like saying a stove and oven are useless because you personally only eat mcdonald's. It's a (You) problem.

It will replace all of us in the next 20 years. We will be cattle.

>>719928479
I'm sure naming their site Lorcanito after the game Lorcana they have no affiliation with is a great start. If Disney wants that site gone it'll be gone. It's probably not even on their radar yet.

>>719928594
This one took a while for you to gen.

Don't care,

AI generate me a pregnant shorstack goblin wife, best quality, masterpiece, absurdres, full body, ass freckles, freckled breats, huge breasts, (sagging breasts:1.7), varicose veins, inverted nipples, hair over one eye, dramatic lighting, reverse suspended congress

>>719928254
100% of ai "artists" are worthless too

>>719928603
It's been running for quite a while and like I mentioned Disney already shut down one other website that was doing more or less the same. So not saying it'll never be taken down but the fact that it hasn't yet shows they've done something to cover themselves.

>>719928331
No one who isn't in it for the money would care about AI. If you make art for personal expression and satisfaction you are literally unaffected by AI

>>719928632
I have a 3090, it takes less than a second for an 1152x1152 image.

>>719928496
SLAP MY HAND

>>719928646
Here you go senpai, shortstack of that popular shortstack artist but the shirt is pink instead of blue.

>>719928501
AI fags are just a lazier version of Luigi here. They did fuck all work and expect praise for it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQMMOEt-8mQ

>>719928695
Hook, line and sinker.

>>719928646
All that to say you are a virgin

>>719928646
those are some looong breasts

>>719927938
but people value the work in the case of art. art definitely sells based on technique. thats why if people know it's ai they don't want to buy it

>>719928732
Please understand. They can’t think straight unless their chat bot tells them how to

>>719926502
you can do it manually with a few programs I think

>>719928774
people do buy AI art because not everyone is autistic.

>>719928770
Show me the hangers.

>>719928729
That's a football dunderhead, he chiselled it.

>>719928501
>This is the realization all AI fags that want to make money will eventually make.
It's the opposite. Why should we pay you overpriced commission art fags when we can do it for free in seconds with your same exact style?

>>719928867
>buying ai art
Lmao

>>719928774
No they don't, at least most people don't. What people care about is how nice the end result looks to them, that's why so many normies went on with the "Ghiblify me AI" fad.

>>719928774
6.2 million

>>719928891
Good job completely missing his point, SAAR.

>>719928867
a significant amount of people wouldn't or would value it less, so you lost the argument and now all you can do is call me autistic.

>>719928891
Try getting a job rajeet

>>719928927
idk what money laundering and insurance fraud has to do with anything

>>719928891
You need that art to feed the ai data set genius

1.2 million

>>719921783
If you're this angry then something tells me not liking AI is right

>Jeets still think AI will replace anything
Lol
Lmao
Kek
Rumao even
God AI's crash is going to be fucking insane, it will be worse than black tuesday and the 2008 financial crash combined since so much money is tied into it.

>>719928774
Anon, 99% of consumers have no fucking idea how art is even made.
Do you think that if you asked some random retard on the streets about blender workspaces or CSP brushes that they'd know what you're talking about? Do you think the average person even understands cursory concepts like layers, opacity, or multiply masks?

No one buys art for the "technique" or "effort" or whatever buzzword you can think of.
They buy GOOD art, and if they later learn it's done traditionally or digitally or via AI, their answer is going to be
>huh, neat
and then they'll forget about it in five minutes.

UH YEAH IF ADOBE AND QUICKBOOKS COULD STOP FUCKING ADDING USELESS GARBAGE AI "FEATURES" COMPLETELY CHANGING UI AND LAYOUT THE APP AND THROWING POPUPS IN MY PAID APP ABOUT HOW EPIC AND HELPFUL THEIR COMPLETELY SHITTY AI TOOLS ARE THAT'D BE GREAT

Honestly, you have to be completely mentally ill and insane to begin with to commission artists for porn. This is the one sector I wouldn't mind dying because of how retarded it is.

>>719929091
it'll be even worse, it's already a bigger bubble than the dot com crash was

>>719929110
>the only way people buy ai is if they are a drooling moron that doesn’t know any better
Hey you said it, not me

>>719928478
>and a disturbing flood of 3 second cartoon cat gore.
That sounds horrible.

>>719929147
2 more weeks

>>719929110
Yeah and anyone who can make good art cash also learn how to prompt good AI art lmao

>>719929143
>trust the experts, like the world economic forum!
post nose

>>719929091
>>719929147
>a technology that is only getting better every month is going to "crash"
AI is like the only new "big" technology we've had in years.
It's as revolutionary as the Compact Disc. What are you gonna do when AI media becomes indistinguishable from real media?
Lol.

>>719921783
this but literally
I must support AI because the right side of the political spectrum does and I wanna fit in

>Pretty pictures made by a computer
Not Art

>Chaining a a dog to a corner at an art museum and starving it whilst also torturing it by having a bowl of food just out of reach
NOW THIS IS ART

>>719929208
Can you try this post again in English, SAAR?

>>719929143
>No mention of jobs cut
>Research predicts
>AI will replace this and that
And continue to fail on every single level.
AI's crash will be spectacular and drag us down with it.

>>719921430 (OP)
>Artist James C Mulligan
1) not an artist if he used AI
>used AI for Card Art
2) card games of this nature are not art
3) Using AI makes it not art, regardless
2)

>>719929249
It won’t. Ai always has tells no matter how much you try to hide it.

how do you even crash something that's free and open source?

>>719929249
>What are you gonna do when AI media becomes indistinguishable from real media?
Nothing because its never going to happen.
Your precious technology that "keeps getting better every single month" is still dogshit and has the most obvious tells ever, it can't even handle extreme motion still which is why so much AI crap is people walking or moving slowly.

If ai is going to replace people it would have already done that. do you retards not think business would replace people at the first opportunity if they could? Most big companies are trying to push ai adoption in companies and forcing employees to use it and failing to see any productivity improvement. The problem is that it literally can't do the job. Also AI isn't getting any better, since gpt 4 it has stagnated. If AI art was so good I shouldn't be able to tell by looking at a thumbnail for 0.2 seconds and already knowing it's AI.

This is art according to anti AIlets
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T68ilzX-B_0

>>719929318
You can't tell.

>>719929368
By being ignorant of what technology is. The techo-luddite corpo bootlicker only vaguely understands "AI investment" and nothing else.

>>719929368
>free and open source
Actual retard. Meta spend billions on ai data centers

>>719929143
>"researcher" predicts 99% unemployment by 2030
>99%

>>719929091
>so much money is tied into it.
Which is why it wont crash unfortunately. They'll force it into everything until it sticks

>>719929278
Those companies overhired like crazy during covid and are now cutting because federal reserve raised rates. AI is an easy excuse to boost stock value.

>>719929439
>waaahhh waahhh waaahhh
Does rajeet need a bottle?

>>719929424
Hundreds of thousands of people have lost their jobs to AI and millions can't get jobs in their fields because of AI.

>>719929443
?
https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui
https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI

>>719929318
Most normies are already at a point where they are completely fooled by it so...
>THAT DOESNT COUNT THEY'RE RETARDED
They are also the main consumers which means AI stuff is bound to succeed in the eyes of the public

>>719929481
>Tape not torn

>>719928735
And?

>>719921732
When a movie cover butches it's art direction

>>719929493
Care to name some?
>inb4 twitter images and google images

>>719929439
Yes most normies can't tell, my mom sure as hell can't but I'm not so much of a dick that I'll yell at her about it, I just smile at whatever cute AI thing she showed me while instantly realizing its AI.

>>719929439
>You can't tell.
>because this "study" filled with "people" couldn't tell

>>719929439
>valve_playtesters.png

>>719929560
IBM

>>719929529
At least you are aware why nobody wants to interact with you

>>719929481
Looks like shit.

Some dude was able to fool an AI taco bell and ordered 18k bottle of water.

>>719929005
This was always brought up when I wan in art school

>>719929621
> For more than a century, IBM has been a global technology innovator, leading advances in AI, automation and hybrid cloud solutions that help businesses grow
Fuckin LMAAAOO

>>719929623
Why would that be a bad thing?
Do you know where you are?

>>719929578
>>719929579
>>719929608
You can't tell.

>>719929494
lol no answer

>>719929723
>shocked not everyone on 4chan is as much of a loser as they are
God this is so sad.

>>719929443
Do you even know what AI is? Meta isn't even relevant.

It's funny that 90% of AI discussion is in the art sector despite how uninteresting it is. Entertainment is just irrelevant shit regardless what happens to it.

>>719929439
That doesn't make your "art" impressive, it just makes the LLM impressive though

>>719927339
This is why people don’t throw you a bone. Get fucked in the torrent of your own endless shit from your own ass.

>>719929808
>cal arts is a know meme even in the art world
What point are you trying to make? I don’t think you have any idea what you are talking about

>>719929854
absolutely seething

>>719929727
>I thought "This is something I drew, right?"
>I draw [an extremely derivative and ugly art style]
>I add personal elements
>I am, ze artiste
>but the AI... it... it drew eyelashes!
>I draw eyelashes!
>I- I'm scared, anon!

>>719929815
I am not going to spend any amount of time arguing with an Indian.

>>719929821
That's because commercial artists and their simps are literally the only people bitching about it. No one is hating on the dude programming AI to beat Pokemon or the AI vtuber with a turtle on her head

>>719929808
>Cherrypicking
Rajeesh please.

>>719929961
Concession accepted, retard.

>>719929872
Lmao it really is like that. Why does 4chan attract the worst crabs in a bucket?

>>719929902
>What point are you trying to make
That all art is by nature derivative, maybe? I'm not that guy

>>719929919
You are because no one will respect you

>>719930027
You're one of the crabs so you already know.

>>719930017
>concession accepted
Yeah I’ll take a hotdog and a coke

>>719929998
And?

>>719929938
>ARTISTS THEMSELVES DON'T COUNT I KNOW MORE BECAUSE I SAY SO
lmao

>>719930095
But I encourage people to go outside and use other sites?? Do you know what “crabs in a bucket” means?

>>719930135
Manga isn't art, anon

When will AI fags make a porn game that isn't cuckold NTR shit? That's all I am asking.

>>719930202
Neither is the stuff made by the people complaining about AI

>>719926159
But how can the Line Go Up if the public doesn't want it?

The truth is, artists have no respect for the tastes of the public, what the "plebs" want, there's absolutely an elitist aspect to this.

Artists are scared that everyone will prefer AI art over their own art. LMAO
I'm pretty sure there are even blind test studies out there that show this.

>4ch*n
>Disney is shit and hires DEI artists that make woke garbage

>Also 4ch*n
>Ummmm actually you need to defend Disney because they're REAL artists

>>719930202
Arakis art is in museums. You cannot be more wrong. This is why ai cucks will never be successful in the art world. They don’t know the fundamentals

>>719926779
Why are AI fags like this?

>>719921430 (OP)
It's not replacing artists, artists are screwing over paying customers by handing them AI slop.
Which is kinda funny for all the whining they do about AI in public.

>>719930142
Is this the best AI has to offer?
>>719930216
I found a couple... the characters changed their details every image, the game was 10% made, and the code was broken despite using one of those visual novel engines where you just write the dialog.
I think AI fags go for the shortcuts inherently, so they just can't make a finished product.

>omly folxs who like slop are brown coded incels and literal poos
deep

>>719930164
>trying to bully us into being 'better men'
Nah go suck a dick Tate. We will eat society away from the inside like parasites to spite self righteous cunts like you.

>>719923217
>I now know that I'm supposed to shit on this, please look at me
Oil paintings aren't hyper detailed, you retard.

>Timeline B
>People have fun making those shitty 3x3 genned outputs
>AI gets more advanced
>AI companies are honest about what it can and can't do
>people accept it as a growing tool that can get better
>corpos decide to wait and refine features before shipping any big changes

>Timeline A (you are here)
>People have fun making those shitty 3x3 genned outputs
>AI gets more advanced
>Jeets immediately use it to try and scam people
>techbros immediately try and act like smug assholes for literally no reason about how you're gonna get replaced by immigra- I mean AI as if they're not first on the chopping block
>content mills spamming a ridiculous amount of fake genned gore and brain melting content on youtube kids
>corpos force AI into every corner of their apps regardless of how shitty or cloggy it makes it

>>719930319
You're just proving him right

>>719926779
>Jeet
>Pronouns

Can't I just hate both of them?

>>719929539
The funny thing is that my example comes from a film made in 1981 based on a book written in 1865 that had a reprint in 2019 that featured a pastiche of the 1981 art. What's interesting is that the pastiche gives us a look at Alice's sister, Dinah, who does not appear in the original 1981 series. I can continue on about the differences between both versions, but I'd rather not ramble on about that nonsense.

>>719930216
>When will AI fags make
Never because AI and by extension AI fags by definition cannot create anything.

>>719930319
He forgot ten shin han's dots

@gronk summarize this thread

>>719930387
Its honestly insane how much AI trash is all over the net, no search result or art website is safe.

>>719930408
Whoever wins, we lose

>>719930384
You are only hurting yourself. The rest of society will move on without you. Do you honestly think you have the power to bring the whole world down with you?

>>719930387
grim trvke

>>719930473
Do you honestly think you have the power to bully us into doing anything?

>>719930416
So by that logic composers are not artists and neither are directors.

>>719930390
>25 heterosexual white men vs 25 pangender demi plex non enby identified trans post sexuals

>>719930390
>strong jawlines and masculine men as role models BAD
Uhhhhh

>>719930442
>people ironically start going "@Grok is this true?" similar to wtf is this real?? to those cat dance videos
>people start doing it unironically and their first instinct is to do that rather than apply any amount of critical thinking, including reading a headline
We're fucked.

>>719930573
>Highest paid job of the production staff is the Director
>Only tells people what to do and provides the least amount of creative output
Yeah checks out.

>>719930569
>cries bully
This is 4chan, not twitter

If you're importing endless pooskins why do you want me to contribute

>>719930675
Then what do you think you're doing, homo?

>>719930456
Why'd they all adopt it before it was proven to generate income?

>>719930442
>yesh

>>719930703
>replies in literally 2 seconds
Hmm I wonder what kinda bot is behind this post

>>719930724
Race to get the foot in the door first.

>>719930623
you have high standards for people on social media.

>>719930623
Yeah because people were such critical thinkers before AI instead of living in perpetual confirmation bias mode.

>>719930414
go ahead and ramble
i like reading ramblings of passionate or knowledgeable anons

>>719930724
I dunno, most of the sites I browse is user generated content, thankfully they let you filter AI out.

>>719930753
>you have to alt tab out and do something else while waiting for someone to respond to you ok?
You have no more arguments.

>>719930573
They actually work with creatives, helping them hone their craft, AI proompters just suck altman's cock

>>719921430 (OP)
Did anyone else kind of want to fuck that rabbit? Like just plow his ass while he complains that it's just making him later.

>>719930810
Arguments to what? Being a meet loser virgin? Be my guest lmao. Ain’t no sweat off my back. Again, it only hurts you.

>>719921430 (OP)
How long until AI replaces all social media posts?

>>719930880
Why do you care?

You know, why are people satanizing AI and everyone who uses it instead of working together and helping to improve it? we literally got a tool that can create anything out of thin air and with just a combination of words or prompts.
Imagine what we could do with it if we work together to improve it instead of throwing shit at each other just because the anime grill had 6 hands and weird eyes or because someoen named rajeesh uses it on a daily basis.

>>719930921
About 3 years ago.

>>719930925
I want better for my fellow man. It’s called being human. Something you wouldn’t know

>>719930938
the people against AI are all leftist freaks of nature

where do i post my god tier ai so that i can get the most attention and maybe grab some donations from people with good taste? its straight lewds, no cuck shit and no brown men. no im not going to share any of it in this thread full of bored stalkers lol.

>>719930938
>Why aren't people working to improve something they hate?
Do you listen to yourself?

>>719930938
Id rather have potable water on demand faggot

>>719927780
ehh nothing wrong with it :)

>>719931002
AI sisters...

>>719930992
Go to twitter and stay there

>replaced artist
>dude gets fire for it

huh?

>the drawing/animation industry been dead since the 90s

double huh?

>>719921430 (OP)
I will never pay for an AI art.

Aifags are so fucking annoying. it's just a search engine that is able to write things in a somewhat human way and they all onions out and think it's alive. I swear these people are just low iq retards. I'm thoroughly disinterested in AI, and they constantly have to try to force it into every conversation. It's tiring.

>>719921430 (OP)
How long until AI replaces CEOs and politicians?

>>719931067
SHUT UP LUDDITE

>>719930938
"we" are. just dont expect to see much in the spirit of cooperation on social media websites full of transvestite blackpilled furries. even before ai people like that were always busy shooting themselves in the foot, sometimes literally.

>>719930974
You have no power over us. You're literately screeching at us like Gaytos to be better men.

You are a retard and an aberration.

>>719931001
>why are people satanizing AI and everyone who uses it
i don't know, do you know how to read?
>>719931035
ok, so going apeshit towards a tool that can help scientists to reach that milestone is gonna help?

>>719931043
most honest india post so far

>>719930938
Yeah, let us all hold hands. This will massively improve AI. Surely most improvement won't come from some chinese fucks locked down in an underground lab.

>>719930724
You don't want to be last to the big bubble that'll definately stick now right?

>>719930974
based human race lover, jeets will never be able to understand fraternity

>>719930938
Why?

>>719931149
>god of Reddit
Why does 4chan attract you have that image saved on your pc? Do you make this same cope every time someone tells you to go outside?

>>719929998
Great
Now I have a virus

>>719931169
well it would be a start compared to just calling each other names in a random thread that will most likely be deleted in a couple of hours....or minutes.

>>719931059
Why are you paying for "art" to begin with? You fucking cuck

>>719931210
Why do you think you can make any of us go outside by bitching about it online?

>>719930724
to any man with a spark of light left in his soul:
amazing technology that restores hope for the future > profit

>>719931149
>being a genetic deadend loser is le good
(You)

>>719930938
>we literally got a tool that can create anything out of thin air
That's my brain and hands. Not your "AI". I won't help you with anything, I will continue to draw on my wacom.

>>719931270
>I can insult people on the internet into starting a family

>>719930938
>that can create anything out of thin air and with just a combination of words or prompts
What tangible thing of benefit can AI create? There's a reason everything that gets made from it are amazon book scams and poorly written most likely generated AI slop youtube stories and fake news. Nothing AI has created has provided a tangible benefit to society

>>719931274
post art.

>>719931309
trv

>>719931274
it loses its value when its made by other people.

>>719931240
See
>>719931270
Again, this only hurts you. Be my guest and stay away from the rest of us so we don’t have to deal with your ilk

Any good lora?

>>719931374
You're here with us, not the other way around retard.

>>719921430 (OP)
More like how long until "problematic" artists are cancelled "using ai"

It's not a tool. That's wackest thing i've ever heard.

>>719930938
Holding hands won't change anything because AI doesn't produce anything, its just vomits out what it thinks you want based off a prompt and all the stolen date its gobbled up.

>>719931237
Art is a manifestation of an idea and a hard work. I can appreciate latter and if I like former I will pay for it.

>>719931303
>I can’t pick up a mate but I am still going to be smug online because…..
I am so glad I don’t wake up in your skin everyday

why should i pay money for someone to prompt an ai when i can do that myself for free

>>719931458
please think of the overpriced commissions!

>>719930573
AI is literally just meshing things together from existing works. Nothing new gets inserted. This isn't me being anti-ai fag it's literally how the tech works.
The ones in your example will always add their own touches too it because humans are not robots who can regurgitate something with 100% accuracy.
Also a human he has to credit the work the source while AI doesn't do this.

>>719931202
>>719930974
Fraternity to whom? To an unemployed illustrator making shitty porn for money? To a stuck up "voice actor" who thinks he/she owns the world because of some lines said on a videogame? Who is it you're having "fraternal care" for by shitting on AI?

>>719931303
no cap, why are they even here go back to xirtter

>>719931445
>I'm going to the sewer and yell at the rats for being covered in shit because...

>>719931405
>doesn’t know about filters
I get to choose what I see on this site. Cope and seethe

>>719925642
It's not "a position at Disney", it's commission work for a card game. It's one of the shittiest paying jobs in the field, which is why you regularly see quality even below that of modern AI.

>>719926484
they already do this. look at the true lies blue ray.

>>719931430
If it's a commercial product then it isn't art

>>719931504
Filter what? You're still responding to me retard.

>>719931490
>all these words to say you are not human
Yea…

>>719927432
>Disney is also going HARD anti-AI
I think we should dissolve their intellectual property rights in their entirety (including trademarks) so that they don't handicap us in the AI-race.

>>719930938
It's just talentless unemployed artists screeching against AI. The world continues to move on.

>>719931420
You calling it vomit doesn't make it less of a produced result

>>719926484
They already did.
https://youtu.be/BxOqWYytypg?si=cEwe0OipwX4Yie5q
Behold and be horrified.

>>719930938
It's so hard to have a proper conversation about this because the problem isn't AI generation specifically. It's an incredibly powerful tool that can be put to amazing use in the right hands, and it's so technologically impressive it's mind-blowing. But the easier the tools of creation become, the less invested one needs to be to create something. Less investment means less effort, less care, less attention to detail. You lose out on something intangible while the computer outputs something that may or may not be technically perfect.

>>719931502
Yes. Makes me feel better about my life choices that I didn’t end up like someone like you.

If Disney could patent ai they wouldn't fire people over it

>>719931490
Except ai only works because of those porn artists and voice actors

>>719931553
Most of the famous art you know was created either under someone's patronage or paid for. And absolute majority of the art was created with getting money in mind. Exceptions are usually religious art pieces.

>>719931458
No one is asking you to

>>719931514
Wearing this outfit in the UK would get you arrested for "violent nationalism" and "inciting anti-immigrant feelings".

>>719931673
Your proompt isn't impressive

>>719931568
Yea but I COULD filter you at any time. All the seethe about dall-e in all the fuckin faggot generals on /v/. No idea what they are talking about because I don’t even see it. At least dall doesn’t try to avoid post filters on purpose

>>719931649
The shit in my toilet is a produced result of my body's natural functions.

>>719931569
>Didn't answer the question
Thank you
>>719931696
And?

>>719931802
>filtering someone on a board without IDs

>>719931317
NTA, but I would like to see AI come up with something as fucked as this.

>>719931835
You shit on it but expect people to like it if you proompt it. How?

>>719931835
What question? All I see is you seething about twitter drama. Just pick up a pencil nigger

>>719931823
Yeah, but I'm not talking about the average "human" art here

>>719931751
t. polish flag on /pol/

>>719931837
*hides post

>>719931514
MtG has such low quality art. Especially secret lairs which are supposed to be these expensive limited print deals. Why can't they be more like Pokemon?

>>719931896
I don't
>>719931908
>What question?
>"Who is it you're having "fraternal care" for by shitting on AI?"
Kill yourself

>>719931960
>*responds anyway

>>719932036
You do

>>719931998
The Sonic Secret Lairs aren't too bad.

>>719930938
>create anything out of thin air
No nigger. It creates from massive amounts of data, computing power and more computing power

>>719921430 (OP)
Very misleading headline. He used sloppa for prints he sold, not for Lorcana card art.

>>719932036
>who are you having fraternal care for?
Other humans. I know… it’s hard to understand for a jeet

>>719931774
I don't prompt. Maybe I misspoke. I'm saying the tech is impressive but its use basically causes creative stagnation, where the average prompter doesn't even understand things like composition, color theory, perspective, even basic proportions. When so much is automated there's a noticeable loss of creative intent.

>>719932145
Liberal art majors aren't human

>>719932130
He might have. There are one or two other cards where people suspect AI was used.

>>719932220
Neither is anyone who isn’t white. Guess that knocks you off the list.

>>719932220
Yet you need their output for your precious AI, curious

Disney is a great evil of humanity.
Sloppa is inhuman evil.
Let them fight.

>>719932281
no you don't

>>719932153
I can't read

>>719932314
Do you have any idea how ai works

>>719931002
LinkedIn is already a shithole overrun by jeets spamming you with fake job offers and for some stupid fucking reason Microsoft doesn't let you make your profile private or restricted so you can avoid these fuckers.

>>719932258
>"unless they make shitty art and complain about AI on social media, then I will love and defend my fellow negroe and spic artists to the death"

>>719932340
No worries, anon.

>>719932417
>twitter drama
Yep. I called it a few posts ago. Just go back

>>719932389
it would work better without liberal arts majors in the data set

>>719932281
Most artists don't give a shit about AI

>>719932417
Love how you are not denying being a jeet

>>719932495
Yeah it would work better with your art

>>719928331
>99% of artists aren't in it for the money
lol

Check out this cool AI art of a new character I made up.

>>719932490
>twitter drama
No "artists" are complaining about AI other than brown subhumans on social media

>>719932529
OK anon

>>719931002
>Actually called Rajesh

>>719932593
Nice better than that fucking tranny garbage they're airing on Adult Swim right now.

>>719932794
Yes anyone that reads comic books know Greg Land is a fucking worthless hack.

I think AI "art" should never actually be used for anything public facing or published or posted in any way however getting zoinked out of your gourd and generating infinite gay furry porn exclusively for personal use is based as hell

>>719932794
>What is rotoscoping

>>719932915
Not the same thing as tracing.

>>719932609
>most sane /pol/faggot

>>719921430 (OP)
You forgot [Good News] in the subject field

>>719932903
Pretty much this I LITERALLY cannot post anything I gen on the internet because I would get thrown in a Salvadorian prison faster than a family of disabled Mexican orphans selling churros outside the white house.

>>719932936
>umm tracing is not actually tracing if we make an animation by tracing every frame of a video

>>719932609
Wake me up when you stop seething about whatever planet you live on.

>>719932532
I'm not a filthy street-eating, cow piss-drinking, women-raping, micropenis-having, train-selfieing brown currycel pajeet. You happy? Or are you still going to pretend anyone who doesn't blindly hates AI stuff is a jeet?

>>719932794
its just a reference bro

Just make your own Disney

>>719933135
>achktually I am a based ruskie chud
Lmao. 3rd worlds cannot stop losing.

>>719932915
Rotoscoping is for animation
That is just either really bad tracing or over reliance on a 'reference'.

>>719933213
>I'll just cycle through insults instead of addressing the point made
Kill yourself

I don't really know much about AI and it's pros/cons. But I do know that the corporate Jews are pushing it really really hard, so it's safe to assume it's a net negative for society.

>>719933308
SAAAAAR I AM NOT THE JEET SAAAAR

>>719933185
with jack black and goblin hookers

>>719933393
there's AI as a technology and AI as a business
the tech is good, the people running the businesses are bad
retards focus only on the businesses and seethe mindlessly about the tech. they are luddites

>>719933393
theyre also pushing hard to put it in a negative light. they just want you to not have any control over it. this is the next gun control.

>>719933308
>thinks anyone is going to waste time arguing with them seriously on 4chan
You are about 15 years too late for that

>>719925031
When is it going to do my fucking laundry

this scares the troon

>>719933393
Low IQ retard
They are pushing it while buying shares and getting government grants. They make trillions by taking over the most important technology that will take over everything.
This is like when whites got so fucked in the head by Christianity they gave all the banks and money lending to jews and then jews became the richest people in the world and control all the money.

>>719930724
You remember that time some lady tried to sell the medical industry a pocket device that used lasers through a finger pricked blood sample to make a diagnosis and they were worth 10 billion dollars because CVS(?) jumped on it and everyone else followed not wanting to be left behind? It's a lot like that

>>719930938
this board literally has people on it from "art" communities who gaslight each other into thinking paying more for art is some sign of prestige (while they compare ai to nfts lol). ai literally threatens their entire personality, they will wear their fingers down to the bone arguing online against ai and do not want it to be useful whatsoever. i kind of love knowing that theyll have to face this sooner or later.

>>719930386
If anything, the most glaring AI-ness of that image is the smeary "detail" on the top of the circle
half-ass greebling

>>719934963
post hand

>>719935395
you won

must have two of them right here. time for you to download a new personality.

>>719923217
It's abstract surrealism bullshit, Unironically alot of post modern art influences is Jewish and I mean holocaust survivor jewish.