Thread 719941017

OLED may not be as good as a very high end new old stock CRT. But its very close.

No thanks, I'll keep buying my cheap aoc minileds!

>>719941017 (OP)
Does text still look shit on them?

>>719941298
If you get a 4k 27 inch. The high PPI mostly fixes it.

My phone is only five years old, but there are a bunch of burn ins on the top and bottom from the battery indicator and other things.

Any benefits you get from OLED are overshadowed by the planned obsolescence of the tech.

>>719941298
text looks fine on that Asus one

>>719941017 (OP)
>*burns*

>>719941017 (OP)
Motion blur out the wazoo, plus a list a mile long of other problems. They're terrible for gaming.

Plasmas are still the best TV's for (HD) gaming.
CRT for everything else (6th gen and below).

>>719941621
>Any benefits you get from OLED are overshadowed by the planned obsolescence of the tech.
Their lifespan is a fraction of LCDs. It's absurd. Especially considering they cost so much.

>>719941778
>>719941621
CRT had burn in also. Especially on monocrome monitors.

>>719941621
You probably dropped it daily and shoved it in your dirty ass pockets and scratched the fuck out of it.

>>719941942
that's not how it works

>>719942056
It is if I say it is, twerp. *cracks knuckles, looking smug*

AAAAAAAA!

Techspot used extreme settings like full brightness on all the time and even after 15 months its very faint. My OLED tv got around 6 - 8 hours usage a day for almost 6 years and got no burn in. It was a bit dimmer. I am happy with 6 years. I sold it for a newer OLED tv

>>719941017 (OP)
>organic
What the fuck? So it's alive?

Poorfags cope thread. Probably all have oled phones too.

>>719941062
>pay 800$ for something that burns in within 6 months
>pay 200$ thats better in every way but you dont get to be a faggot

>>719941017 (OP)
Not as good in motion clarity. Whenever someone figures out how to make Blur Busters CRT beam simulation/CRT 60hz simulation shader work flawlessly on OLED monitors with shaderglass app then we'll be finally in a more ideal place for high refresh rate OLED monitors. This is a major secondary reason i bought a 240hz 4k OLED monitor, despite knowing my framerates wouldn't be hitting that. To be able to run that specific shader that requires high refresh for optimal results. Or G-sync Pulsar OLEDs might be capable of something similar in the future so that has the potential to be exciting, i haven't seen how that works yet with my own eyes so it's hard to say.
Last time i checked it had syncing issues, and i don't know if it ever got addressed. Link to it below:
https://github.com/mausimus/ShaderGlass/releases/tag/v1.2.0-bfi-alpha1

^ if this gets figured out then we're closed to not needing to discuss CRTs anymore in regards to gaming. If you got it working then maybe i did something wrong. 240hz is minimum.

>>719941895
The only way to get burn in with CRT was to let it running at max brightness for over a year or so.
OLED burns in after normal use in like 2 months.

>>719942709
>OLED burns in after normal use in like 2 months.
That's just a blatant lie

I finally bought into the OLED meme and I have to say I didnt notice a difference until I put the OLED right next to my old tv and played the same content at the same time. LCD is like everyone turned off the lights. I'll never go back

>>719942873
Silly anon

>>719942975
I'm just not really blown away by HDR. It wasn't some life changing thing. I don't really care about whether my content is in HDR or SDR in all honesty.

>>719943013
There's countless of these lol
Failed technology

>>719943343
Another faulty monitor.
Actual burn in does not go away.

>>719941017 (OP)
>planned obsolescence
I shan't pay. Simple as.

>>719943497
lots of "faulty" monitors.
These retards are literally paying premium to get fucked in the ass lol

>>719943610
Most electronics have a one percent failure rate. Only people with problems will actually post threads about it. You won't here the other 99 percent with no issues.

>>719943756
I'm sure 99.9999999999999% of OLEDs are perfect and never fail, that's why they're everywhere and replaced LCD back in 2006 when they first came out :)

>>719943849
are you the same anon that's been plaguing these threads for ~2 years now?

>>719943141
I'd be more interested in hdr if it was standardized properly instead of everything being a complicated mess like it is now

>>719945613
are you the same shill that's been making these threads for ~3 years now?

>>719941298
I've never looked into oled because I don't ever want to think about burn in, do they have clarity issues that results in blurry text or something?

Quality of your monitor dosent really matter. Games run like shit and video bitrate is horible.
Only thing you need good monitor is if your work includes any kinda editing.

I'm thinking of getting a new TV soon, what display tech and brand do I get?

>>719945992
QD-OLED and WOLED have a non-standard pixel layout that causes this fringing problem, most clearly visible with text.

>>719946595
oh dear. is it just a current limitation of the technology, like they can't make the oleds as small as normal leds for the multiple subpixel lights per pixel or something?

>>719946101
it's funny how poors always try and validate themselves not having anything good while imposing nobody else should have it either.

>>719946768
I believe the problem is that software expects a LCD like pixel layout. Apparently developers can compensate for the different pixel layouts, which Adobe has done for example.

>>719947017
wow I never would have thought about displays arranging all the subpixels completely different from each other. man, display tech is complicated

>>719941017 (OP)
Even if OLED didn't burn it, it still has
>shitty pixel layout
>VRR flicker
>low luminance issues (dirty screen/black crush)
>aggressive ABL
and if you throw in inevitable burn-in on top of all that...are your "perfect blacks" really worth it?

>>719947229
nigger we solved this years ago with simple RGB layouts in CRTs and LCDs
OLED is just a piece of shit technology

>>719947590
It mostly the response time that makes it worth it. Contrast is fantastic but like 90% of all content doesnt have pure blacks to begin with.
Vrr flicker is a huge fucking problem tho.
As a tv, I love it, its also great for more vintage gaming, but I still use a high end IPS for pc gaming

>>719947741
response time is kind of moot when it still suffers from the inherent flaws of sample-and-hold motion display

>>719941621
I have had this phone for seven and never had issues and I've never heard anyone with an oled phone having issues. You just had bad luck just like the people who get dead pixels after couple of years in their monitors do. This hardly means that the tech is somehow bad

>>719946768
they have to make them flawed so they can sell the next generation

>>719947017
>software expects a LCD like pixel layout
If that is the case, shouldn't the display's firmware handle this by translating or emulating such a layout?

luv me oled
luv me crt
muh ips is okay

>>719942135
>roommate had to look at a still image of gay porn for 2 weeks every time he passed by
Ah yeah, massive pwn

>>719941017 (OP)
>new old

>>719948548
Don't you have some radium jelly to rub on your wounds?

>>719947590
I have two monitors. a 43" VA and 48" OLED.
The OLED wins on everything other than a handful of games in HDR.
I won't be buying and LCD display again

>>719941062
HOLY BASED

>>719948668
good goy

>>719941017 (OP)
CRT is fucking dogshit

>>719942135
It was probably a Plasma TV. It had the same problem OLED has.

>>719948731
>seething poor

>>719948863
I bet you don't even have $5k speakers lol poorfag

Isnt it fascinating that we achieved the best motion clarity and color with crt and plasma TVs and ever since then we've been trying to replicate it. It's like a lost technology

>>719948932
Based coconut audio customer.

>>719948951
crts struggle to even cover srgb, have major issues with brightness levels, are massive power hogs and have major issues in size scaling. Unless you want your 42" TV to weigh 200kg (KX-45ED1).

>>719948951
There is no good reason we can't have 1000hz refresh rate LCD/OLEDs with our modern technology (at that refresh rate, sample and hold displays finally match CRT motion)

>>719948932
like these?

when are we getting QDEL

>>719949189
2 more weeks alongside microLED.

>>719949209
microLED isn't coming to the consumer market anytime soon
miniLED is too easy to scale up and it's dirt cheap, so prepare to see a lot more miniLED monitors, each new model with more LED zones than the previous one

>>719949189
>QUANDEL
SHIEEET WE WUZ PIXELS N SHIET

>>719949181
bass'd

>>719949298
>zones
Doesn't matter - until you can do per pixel then it is just a stop gap.

>>719949368
I don't think you comprehend the size of a pixel on a 4k display
past a certain amount of diming zones, it would be indistinguishable from per pixel illumination in nearly 100% of all media content

>>719949496
I hate that my cursor becomes dark in a black scene on my 4K QDEL TV with over 1600 zones

>>719949496
>you imbeciles just can't comprehend what I can easily comprehend...
white text on black will have blooming unless it's per pixel.

>>719949551
That's a combination of dimming zones + algorithm
they could absolutely make it to where your cursor doesn't dim, but depending on the zone size there would be significant bloom
even your cursor is made up of several hundred pixels
I would say dimming zones the size of an average cursor would be the limit of what is needed

>>719949608
white text on black will even appear to bloom on OLED due to the way your eyes work

>>719949651
so adding even more blooming helps it does it?

>>719949675
No, I'm saying it would be indistinguishable from OLED after a certain point of zone size.
Per pixel isn't needed in a vast majority of use cases.

>>719949718
>in a vast majority of use cases
unless it's detailed white on black, like I said.
You can double down all you like. You're still wrong

who here /preorder/
it comes out at the end of this month
https://rog.asus.com/us/monitors/27-to-31-5-inches/rog-strix-oled-xg32ucwmg/

>>719949761
Currently, the juice ain't worth the squeeze.

>>719943849
These are very complex electronics retard, failures are expected and that's why warranties exist
Are you comparing failure rates to chairs or something?
You're not going to find the people who have no problems with their hardware praising it, learn what a negativity bias is

>>719949990
IF GRAPH IS ONLY 2D LINES WHY IS TRIANGLE?!?

>>719949907
>it's down to price
yet again another poor trying to dictate what others should see/use/buy

>>719950059
Doesn't need to be.

>>719948749
You are fucking dogshit.

>>719949990
>you only need grey blacks and 50nits

>>719950157
Oh its much more than price

>>719950015
Learn how OLED works and why it's a shit failed technology.
Stupid fucking shill retard.

>>719950209
>you only need grey blacks
That isn't that is being shown
>50nits
Worked fine for 50 years.

>>719950243
should I just get the aoc minileds then or wair for qdel

>>719943013
Yeah a lot of those og g9 panels were trash. I have one and had to have the panel replaced because it shipped with a dead line of pixels down the screen. No QC on the originals. New panel is great, though.

>>719950243
>It's failed because... I found some posts on Reddit
>No it's not sour grapes
>Posted from a 60hz 1080p tn panel

>>719950438
Sour what? any retard who bought these shitty screens report problems with them, whether it's burn in, visual glitches, low brightness.
There's a reason most people still use LCD for their screen monitors you retard shill and it's not the price.

>>719950531
You have people in this thread praising them and there are tons of redditors saying that too
You're cherry picking you moron
>There's a reason most people still use LCD for their screen monitors you retard shill and it's not the price.
Because they don't know about them and don't think about it?
Are you projecting your retarded mentality?

>>719950531
Its the price. Gaming on an s95f is insane.

>>719950676
>You have people in this thread praising them
Where? you're literally the only shill desperate defending them lol
>You're cherry picking
I'm just proving you wrong.

>Because they don't know about them
OH YEAH IM SURE NOBODY KNOWS ABOUT OLED THAT CAME OUT 15 YEARS AGO LOL

You're so pathetic, are you indian? they shouldn't pay you for this shitty job at shilling saar

>>719950256
>worked for 50 years
yes. so did monophonic audio from a wax cylinder and AM radio

>>719948951
>It's like a lost technology
it's shit technology, plasma had phosphor trails for fast moving images, and a slew of things that made it shit.

>>719950826
...and the greatest movies and songs were made during that time and were expected to be played on such devices.

>>719950531
>any retard who bought these shitty screens report problems with them
I have had no problems in 3 years, screen looks as good as the day I bought it, 0 burn in 0 issues.
what now?

Are there actually like, organisms in the OLED and shit? Whoa...

>>719950980
post screenshot with it at max brightness on a solid color with timestamp or you're full of shit shill

>>719951090
Consider that oled users have more culture growing in their screen than /v/ does on any given day.

>>719950745
you're just proving that you're basing your understanding of technologies based on the experiences of redditors instead of people who actually test the burn in professionally
all you need to do to prevent it is run at a lower brightness, get some curtains to darken your room and set a screensaver
but you'd rather have your poverty phd because you badly need that affirmation that you're not missing anything

>>719951192
>Still refuses to post proof
>Still pretend he's not a shill
>Still gets butt devasted after getting called out for being a shitskin indian

KEK, they didn't send their smartest pajeet

>>719951239
>completely pivots into his retarded vibes based jeetjacketing because he failed on the logical front
you love to see it

>>719951321
>Jeet shinsking absolutely MALDING after getting called out

You love to see it.
Now that you finally admit you're just a shill we can finally move on and let your pathetic marketing thread die.

You're not getting paid btw :)

>>719950879
you still listen to monophonic records and watch B&W movies do you?
don't talk fucking shit

>>719951357
i miss when we used to have threads where people would actually talk things instead of retards like you trying to project being a tough guy

>>719951426
>I miss it when I was on Reddit shilling my shit product :<

>>719941621
Insane that products like OLED are even allowed on the market.

nearly 6000 hours on my oled monitor and still no burn in

>>719951461
>it's shit because i don't have it and i want to hold onto the belief i still have bleeding edge hardware

>>719951583
>le you cannot afford OLED in 2025 even though it's cheap and literally every handheld console and phone have them :<

>>719941017 (OP)
>But its very close.
is what someone who doesnt know what sample and hold blur is would say

>>719951583
my guy, the ps vita had an oled screen and that was ages ago

>>719951619
>what is size and economy of scale
and yes, i doubt you can get a 4k240/1080p480 monitor so you are in fact coping
as evidenced by how your accounts come from redditors lmao
you're not talking anything technical, you're just on the ass end of the game of telephone

>>719951828
>Muh 4K
KEK, you're such a fucking retarded shill holy shit

>>719951867
thank you for acquiescing that everything you don't like is a meme
develop some theory of mind for once
see how you've gone from even talking about the subject matter to just 4k?

>>719952017
Why would it matter if the OLED is 4K or not?
Fucking retard.

>>719951867
Kek what a poorfag. Sucks to suck, loser. 4K's been mainstream for like 9 years now I'm sure you can pick up some scraps secondhand like the thirdie you are.

>>719952067
So true sis!

I 'member when people said 1080p was only for retarded consoomers and nobody EVER will need more than 1280x1024. Oddly when 1080p became dirt cheap this opinion vanished.

>>719952105
>real men still use dual core phenoms, agp cards and CRTs!
OK gramps time to go to bed

>>719952060
because higher is just better
there's no nuance
again, why did you abandon talking about oleds entirely?

>people still use 1080p and 1440p
ha ha

>>719952290
>because higher is just better

>>719941834
This is objectively wrong. OLEDS retain their brightness for years after LCD brightness plummets due to age. Having a bit of burn-in doesn't render the screen useless, you know that right?
Just like when you buy a brand new LCD and the blacks are a bright navy blue, and the colours shift when you rotate the screen -- these are not ideal and look shit, but the screen still works. You can continue to use it.

>>719952432
>tech of all things never progresses I AM NEVER OBSOLETE
cope

>>719952175
Its poorfag cope all the way down.
At the end of the day, people like new things, they just cant always afford them.

>>719952471
>watches 360p youtube video on his 4K TV

>>719942802
A cheap OLED will burn in in like a week, speaking from personal experience

>>719952479
Which baffles me, you can get yesterday's entry level HDR TVs for like $350 on sale. Which you can use to play vidya AND watch kino.

>>719952590
4k HDR TVs that are like 65 inch* I mean

>>719952524
but this is /v/? what is this retarded interjection? were you deployed here by your discord?

so why did we go through all this trouble to make new screen technology that's just worse than CRTs?

>>719952590
Not everyone has space for more than a 24" monitor retard.

>>719952662
Let's see your 65" CRT bro

>>719952708
Yeah and not everyone is poor, what's your point

>>719952708
Do you live in a closet? You can get wall mounts, you know?

>>719952662
the only way in which a crt is better, motion clarity, is humanly imperceptible and it's down entirely to the way monitors even render shit

>>719952534
>>719942802
Samefag

>>719951102
>jump through these hoops so I can still not believe you anyway.
nah im good, I really hope you figure out whatever problems you have with this specific display technology anon.

>>719954169
>I can't prove it because I'm a full of shit indian shill
Thanks for letting us know

I want an old console but I don't have a screen that can take analog inputs :(

>>719955480
use a converter

>>719955637
Are converters any good now? I remember buying one about 15 years ago for a Wii and it was horrible, the image was completely broken.

>>719955841
Retrotink. They have models for all needs.

>>719955905
Negro I am not paying those prices lmao.

>>719954223
I will. 6k hours as a monitor on mostly desktop.

>>719956636
>no timestamp
Nice google seach image faggot

>>719956712
>hurrr durr hurr durrr durrr
retarded poor

>>719956756
>Gets called out for making shit up
>p-p-poorf-f-fag!

KEK, indians are so retarded and low IQ.

>>719957350
>y-y-you're indian
you must be a complete loser if an indian has better stuff than you

>>719958590
OLED are cheap as fuck, if anything, you're the indian pajeet who can't afford it lol

>>719959571
>posts 4 image of screen
>y-y-you can't afford it
I can see you're another brainless retard. no wonder you're poor as fuck

>>719959739
>posts some shitty google search image
>those are totally mine btw haha :)
Poor AND retarded

What an awful combination

>>719959876
>I just can't believe anyone can own an OLED monitor
This is your brain on poverty meals I guess

>>719960074
Stop projecting your poverty Ranjesh

>>719960135
>look ma, I called him an indian again
funny how the worst insult you can call someone is an indian, you're clearly a paki

>>719956636
which model

>>719960186
>muh paki
KEK so you ARE a shitskin india after all.

>>719960230
LG GQ900

>>719960281
>LG

>>719960318
?