Thread 720062793

Reminder that /v/ is a NeutralCHAD board

>>720062793 (OP)
N

>>720062793 (OP)
Neutral is for faggots, no smt has a good ending on the neutral side. Is always "yeah danger avoided but you are still kinda fucked".

>>720062793 (OP)
wrong
we are whiteGODS in this household, nog

Neutral is just the worst of both worlds.
Humans left alone will always end up in some kind of capitalist dystopia

>>720063676
How is that different from any other ending. The entire point of the series is that everything is cyclical. Even if you get a Chaos win now eventually someone else will come and change things.

>>720064007
>The entire point of the series is that everything is cyclical.
No, the entire point of the series is the exact opposite, break the cycle and bring change. Bring humanity to the next step of evolution, redo the world with different rules.
Being neutral is being passive, ignoring the problems or basically waste all your potential. In the specific of SJ? The Schwarzwelt is the way to fix a humanity that is basically atrophying itself with violence and wars. Deciding not to use the immense Schwarzwelt's power is just to keep lviing like a vegetable, you NEED to bring change, whatever it is, but keep with the established it's always the wrong choice.

>>720064560
Nah, it's spelled out in nearly every game that all the apocalyptic events you're going through have been done countless of times.

>>720064643
Yes and? Another Bible shows you an intergenerational series of games where you can see how the mc of the last game brought change and you are there again to change it again. The Cycle is a constant but it doesn't mean that change is useless. There will be always forces in opposition, there will be always conflict, the neutral option doesn't invalidate nor the cycle nor the conflict, it just "jump" it to the next iteration.

>I's Neutral ending leads directly into a Lawful cyber-theocracy
>III's most traditional Neutral ending is just a status quo reset with Lucifer going "lol just be ready to go at it again soon"
>SJ's Neutral ending(s) is just even more can kicking down the road
>IV's Neutral ending fixes literally nothing except Tokyo gets sunshine

Nice alignment. Not.

>>720062793 (OP)
Sorry, chud. This is a ChaosGOD board.

>killing everyone is chaos ending
huh, it should be neutral, how is it chaos.
if there are A group fighting B group and you get rid of both A and B group, then you are neutral.

>>720065538
There's three groups. Angels, Demons and the humans in the middle.

>>720065710
kill them all, let god sort them out.

>>720064560
neutral endings do bring change, in the sense that angel bitches and demon fags aren't behind the scenes trying to control humanity
>b-but they'll come back
because atlus wants to make more money, but outside of SMT 1 -> 2 which was over 30 years ago they haven't ever walked back an ending

>>720066617
The "change" you bring is eliminating two possibilities but the status quo keeps going.
>>720065186
This is a sum of some neutral ending. The point of the neutral ending is that there is no change. I played almost all the games, no neutral ending give any sense of satisfaction in game and often outside because all the effort you employed during the game is kinda for nothing.

>>720064560
>the entire point of the series is the exact opposite, break the cycle and bring change. Bring humanity to the next step of evolution, redo the world with different rules.
Being neutral is actually what you look for metaphysically speaking. Chaos and Law are dogmatic by definition, and when you align at some edge of the pendulum, you become subservient to some deity. Becoming a free will agent bring change under your terms, making the demons and angels alike to serve humanity, not otherwise. Of course, the problem is that japanese writing fucking sucks most of the time tbhq

>>720063840
My MAN

>>720062793 (OP)
/v/ is a nortubel chad board