>>720278358
>I'll never understand pedos
I do understand normies, at least to a degree. If you limit pedophilia to girls like Diana or younger I can see why you, or anyone else, would say that they have "no shape" even though I'd disagree. I know that it is not the case but I believe you're entitled to consider it as such and wouldn't try to convince you otherwise I'd say girls of those ages are an "acquired taste" amongst most pedos but it must be clear that the limit for such an argument is there, at those ages, anything higher than that, like for example, Sarah Miller, is a completely different beast. Saying girls like her or around her age don't have traditionally women-like body shapes it is a position that's so out of line and mistaken that it cannot be accepted by anyone pretending intellectual honesty under any circumstance, ever.
Those girls DO have feminine proportions.
