Thread 720434592

>a gpu from 10 years ago that wasn't even high end back then can run the latest AAA game at playable framerate
>optimization BAD
how can people be so stupid?

>>720434592 (OP)
>30 fps
>playable

Bait used to be believable

>>720434592 (OP)
stfu console nigger 30 fps is NOT playable

>>720434656
thats actually 15 kek, with fake frames on 2x

>>720434592 (OP)
It stutters like shit even on 3060. An average framerate means nothing when you have stutters mid-combat, it's just not in a playable state then

>>720434592 (OP)
Because people saying that are trying to play at a consistent 420 fps at 4k without a single dip, moron.

>>720434592 (OP)
it could run way better than this

>>720434592 (OP)
>looks like shit
>runs like shit
>>>despite using stylized art

what's the point of using stylized art if you aren't going to take advantage of the performance benefits from it? you're not aiming for photo realism, use less fucking polygons or effects or what the fuck

>>720434592 (OP)
>720p 30fps low
I fucking hope so too.

kek 30fps on Lowest setting using scaler. This is some ps3 bullshit

>>720434656
legally playable

>>720435280
Yea its retarded, they literally have the most expensive lightning and rendering for no gain. Borderlands 2 looks better than 4 in many scenarios

>>720434592 (OP)
borderlands 3 runs at 100 fps on my gpu and looks sharper and better than this does running 60 fps

>another borderlands shilling thread
cmon randy...

>>720434592 (OP)
you are stupid not understanding all the sacrifice in graphic settings were made for that

>>720435416
you sick fuck

>>720434592 (OP)
>1060
>but 32 GB RAM
lmao why?

I will not touch this slop with no latinx men representation..

that cel-shading shit makes me remember Champions Online.

>>720435627
Maybe he does a lot of virtualization

>>720434592 (OP)
Now try it in 4K with supersampling + max setting.
See how your fps tanked? Unoptimized.
You're supposed to be able to run max setting with your old ass gpu or it's fucking unoptimized.

>>720435627
think, nigger. he put an old card into his new system.

>>720434592 (OP)
30 Fps for first person shooter is acceptable if you are either brown, consolepoor or both

>>720434592 (OP)
>2 year old i7
>32GB DDR5
Fair and balanced.

>>720434592 (OP)
>30 fps
>18 fps lows
>low quality
>1080p upscaled with FSR3
lmao

>>720434592 (OP)
>720p 30fps without moving
now try walking without crashing.

>>720437330
And why would he do that?

>>720434592 (OP)
now show it on a cpu from 10 years ago

>>720434592 (OP)
>fsr3
unplayable
that shit looks bad using quality at 4k (1440 to 4k) it's so crap

People here are too young to remember the mid 2000s when a midrange card couldn't run everything AT LAUNCH. Although in fairness visual performance was moving at an exceptional pace back then. Borderlands 4 looks barely distinguishable from a 2015 game in terms of tech, so it's understandable that people are upset that it can't be run on the same specs

>>720434592 (OP)
game looks like borderlands 2, which a 10 year old GPU could run just fine. so why would a game that looks like a 13 year old game require such high hardware requirements? surely not because those with long noses, such as you, had a hand in it

>>720437985
>People here are too young to remember the mid 2000s when a midrange card couldn't run everything AT LAUNCH
Not true, a midrange card easily run stuff at at least 30 fps stable with low/medium setting
minus crysis.
Back than we actually had texture setting compared to today.

i am so tired of unreal engine. i almost hate it more than i hate women

>>720439374
What a surprise, poorfags hate unreal.

>>720437865
The game probably won't run on less RAM. So he can't run it on his old rig.

>>720434592 (OP)
>how can people be so stupid?
They bought BL4.

>>720439512
Alright, I thought the implication would be that he deliberately put an old GPU inside his system so that he could bait here and say how bad the game runs kek

>>720434679
Can the 1060 even do fake frames

>>720442141
no

>>720442141
I suppose with a software like lossless or something

>>720438780
>minus crysis
Crysis wasn't even the most demanding PC game around the time of its release strictly speaking, STALKER was harder to run and GTA IV didn't even get a locked 30fps with two GT8800s running in SLI

>>720434592 (OP)
>1080p
>low
>FSR
>30fps

>>720434592 (OP)
>30 FPS with DLSS enabled
>at playable framerate

>>720442340
stalker still gets frame drops on modern machines

>>720442468
dipping from 500 to 480 isn't that much of a problem

>>720442468
So does the original Crysis, if you can get it to run

>can run the game at 1440p at mostly high settings with little to no impact
>but if i set my texture quality to anything but low the whole game tanks from around 80fps to 20 during combat
Imm being bottlenecked by something here...

>>720434592 (OP)
Why would someone with a 1060 have 32 gigs of ram and a newish high end processor?