>>720436029
No one wants freedom of speech, everyone is getting their panties in a twist when their feelings are hurt. Right's rhetoric of "No life ruination!" was purely because they were in a much weaker position and they wanted to cover their own asses.
>but this time it is different
No it is not. Every single person in a political team saying "I am for freedom of speech" always omits the quite part of "but there won't be freedom of consequences". Right now the red team is in an upswing, so they are going to use this weapon now.
tl;dr both teams are fucking garbage and Wuk Lamat should have been a fun character but the new writer can't write for shit.