Thread 720619879

I thought you said anime games and VNs weren't going to be affected.

>>720619879 (OP)
>JAST
fuck off

>>720619990
seethe

>>720619879 (OP)
Now if only Rockstar and Activision were to be banned for promoting murder and mass shootings then America would become a land of the Godly peaceful.

Is there any place with a semi intelligent analysis of this issue?

We are dealing with what are quite possibly the two most stupid and emotional demographics of biased irredeemable retards, the tranime imperium and fucking government normgroids.
What is actually being done? What are the realities of enforcement etc.
I know how things really work so the idea that they are going to even be able to go hunt down all these legions of pathetic coomers is laughable, little man ,they(FBI) were having to prioritize baby rape and fresh child producers for over a half decade before the first AI wave hit, that was like 8 years ago when Bill Barr went up and basically said "child porn is everywhere and we cant do shit about it", and kind of deadpanned the camera.

>>720619879 (OP)
>this helps fighting wokeness... probably, right?
cope. You wanted this

>>720620516
What is there to analyze? The US has gone full retard, that's all there is to it

>>720620654
Thank you, tranime imperium, I was asking an adult.
It is not possible to enforce in any great measure little man. You have to grow out of the "government is all knowing, and cam actually do something with what it knows" phase quickly if you want to start enjoying life.

>>720619879 (OP)
who

>>720619879 (OP)
Dev? i thought it was a shop

>>720620516
>little man ,they(FBI) were having to prioritize baby rape and fresh child producers for over a half decade before the first AI wave hit, that was like 8 years ago when Bill Barr went up and basically said "child porn is everywhere and we cant do shit about it", and kind of deadpanned the camera.

AI generated cunny is unstoppable because AI progress is unstoppable now.

GG FBI, retarded conservatives and trannoid homonculi.

>>720619879 (OP)
Is OnlyFans banned in Texas?

>>720620516
>hurrrr why is there no middle ground in authoritarian level goverment censorship of fictional works. What are the nuances of censorship? Is it gentle censorship? Is it rough censorship? Is it easy to evade the enforcement of this law that I may actually be reasonable which is why I'd want to evade it?

Fence sitterism is a genuine mental illness.

Not a jewmerimutt so not my problem

Remember when mutts complained about games getting censored to cater to china?
LOL

>>720621196
>Another tranimal chimes in, this time thinking my question about how the state of texas is actually going to enforce this, and asking what "this" even is, equates to taking some sort of political position on the issue.
Youre being irrational. I dont need to hear from one side or the other what they feel about the issue, Ive heard everyones feelings for decades.
Im asking for someone intelligent and rational to parse out the gist of the law, and their assessment of how the state is actually going to enforce whatever that gist is.
If screeching "Anime ban" and spraying shit and piss on everyone who moves didnt educate me yet it probably never will, little guy.

>>720621534
Why do you care about how it's enforced? as long as it's reasonable you should just go along with what it dictates of your own volition, right? Surely if the law wasn't utterly retarded you wouldn't concern yourself with how safe you are from its enforcement.

>>720621534
>Texas Senate Bill 20 (S.B. 20), also known as the "Stopping AI-Generated Child Pornography Act",[1] is a 2025 law in the state of Texas that creates new criminal offenses for those who possess, promote, or view visual material deemed obscene, which is said to depict a child, whether it is an actual person, animated or cartoon depiction, or an image of someone created through computer software or artificial intelligence. It was passed by the Texas Legislature on May 28, 2025, unanimously in both chambers. It was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.[2] It went into effect on September 1, 2025.[3]
Basically they can just decide any anime looking thing is pornografphy and make the destribution of it iligal on the state.

>>720620516
>semi intelligent analysis
I can't promise that, but I can give my understanding of it:
Senate Bill 20 was passed for Texas law to add clarification on obscene, illegal material:
>regardless of whether the depiction is an image of an actual child, a cartoon or animation, or an image created using an artificial intelligence application or other computer software.
The problem stems from sickos using AI to create illegal material and being like 'ackually its AI that did it' or 'its not real so its okay :^)' and skirting the law that way. This really only SHOULD apply to situations where AI was used to make said stuff so they can slap them down with the law this time- no holding back.
HOWEVER, the wording and phrasing of this law was too vague and unintentionally (at least to its stated goal) could be used to pull in anime, manga, video games, etc. too because of the wording. The penalty for breaking said law is on equal ground to the actual sickos, so situations like this will likely keep happening.
Ultimately, its a good intention law that allows for serious unintentional consequences to occur. Most likely what happened was the people involved with writing and approving the law either knew of the unitentional conseuqnces and approved it anyways because the net good is much higher than the net bad, OR they didn't realize what they just allowed for. Most likely the former because they can't afford to lose against the sickos going 'ackually...' with AI and stuff, so they needed to cover as much ground as they could.
In an ideal world, this won't impact anything except stop more sickos. But this could also be used as a huge overreach and be misunderstood because video games, anime, manga, etc. are all still relatively new mediums to being accepted in society as a whole. It is a wait and see sort of situation.
Hopefully it is used as intended and really helps protect people, instead of being used to chase after situations where this isn't relevant at all.

>>720622002
>using AI to create illegal material
LOL

>>720622002
>This really only SHOULD apply to situations where AI was used to make said stuff so they can slap them down with the law this time- no holding back.
>HOWEVER, the wording and phrasing of this law was too vague and unintentionally (at least to its stated goal) could be used to pull in anime, manga, video games, etc. too because of the wording. The penalty for breaking said law is on equal ground to the actual sickos
You're not being very consistent.

Is the purpose of anti child porn laws protecting actual children, or moral policing?

If it's the former, banning AI generated depictions make absolutely no sense, as no children are abused. If it is the latter, I see absolutely no reason why pedophilic depictions in anime, manga, video games, etc. shouldn't be held to the same standard and punished to an equal degree.

>>720621196
These are the same retards as those in the UK that sat on their asses at every government overreach until they went full Giganigga Orwell.

>>720621801
Most laws about anime are made by bolmer retards who don't even know what it is.
So im not surprised.

>>720622002
>In an ideal world, this won't impact anything except stop more sickos
It won't stop Trannies and fags from grooming kids

>>720622002
>video games, anime, manga, etc. are all still relatively new mediums
video games are more than two generations old already
cartoons and comics are ancient shit
none of the new at all

>>720622289
>You're not being very consistent.
I didn't write the law, I'm just writing out what I understand is the intention and consequences behind it. The intention is to protect kids by cutting off this new avenue for the illegal material be sent and/or created through.
The problem is this will probably also be used for moral policing as well by going after cases where it isn't relevant.
>>720622558
Correct, but you grab a person off the street in their 70s and show them a game like the Final Fantasy 7 remake, Expedition 33, or Silksong. It's highly likely they won't be familiar with it. They may know about The Last Of Us or The Witcher because of the tv shows. They'll know Mario, Minecraft, Fortnite, probably Roboblox, and other popular games like that. Show them Elden Ring and they'll probably not have heard of it.

>>720622334
This is why its hars to give a shit about you specifically, youre just like trannies.
I was asking 2 questions to understand whats even going on, the brainrotter immediately attacks me for doing something besides rabidly advocating whatever he expects me to, I point out Im just asking whats going on, you ignore both of my posts and just sling your spitwad of retards wisdom thinking youre in the right somehow. You are a fool, and Ive noticed you havent even addressed the root of these issues, christianity, feminism, and jews. YOU are the one who lets things slide into tyranny while you coom your brains out and attack everyone else who doesnt even when they are technically on your side. Rabid animal, and a child.

>>720621801
>see attractive woman in vidya
>is this porn?
this is what those retards actually believe

>>720619879 (OP)
Tranime btfo

>>720623025
They make themselves the most insufferable fucking single minded faggots on the internet for the last 30 years, long before the tranny streak emerged. NO ONE is so thoroughly obsessed and brainwashed by something so niche, no one is so stunted intellectually, emotionally, and spiritually.
I dont want to deny them any of their gay ass shit but holy fuck cant they not let it burn out whatever shred of a soul they were born with, not become a part of this uwu nazi hivemind of porn addled infantile degenerates?

JAST still exists?

>>720619879 (OP)
[jubilant hollywood noises]

>>720619879 (OP)
isnt this the faggot that got nhentai taken down?

>>720623161
What are you talking about?

>>720623161
>nazi
Tranny detected

>>720619879 (OP)
Texas fag here, no one who wants loli shit is so much of a normalfag that this will affect them. The state government isn't going to prevent anyone from accessing anything lol, this guy should just find other, smarter avenues of peddling his filth
All porn is gay and makes your soul gay

>>720622957
>I didn't write the law
No but you expressed the sentiment of "these sickos generating AI child porn should be persecuted but I'm worried they might misuse it to persecute anime pedo sickos which is unwarranted". Your standpoint makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, regardless of if you're one one side of the fence, the other, or have the fencepost lodged deep in your ass.

>BANNED FROM TEXAS
>Actually just refused a booth at a convention
Please don't tell lies

>>720623461
?
No one is telling lies this is a real bill.
You can literally find it it's callled SB-20.

>>720619879 (OP)
Holy shit when did Texas turn as cucked as the UK

>>720619879 (OP)
Based.
Don't mess with Texas.

Chudbros I thought Trump was supposed to save us. Why did I vote republican in the last election?

>>720623451
Because there is a clear difference between the two, and how that content is generated. And because of how that wording is stated in the law, it could be used to go 'well the manga says she is 30 years old but she looks younger to me SO LOCK THIS GUY UP'.

>>720623739
Tbh even with this it was still the better option.
With kamala you would have gotten more DEI media shit.

>>720619879 (OP)
>somewhere in never-la-la-la-land-of-bumfuck-nowhere
Why do we care?

>>720620516
Always root for the small man, even if you hate the small man. Small men should stay together, because together they are strong.

>>720622289
Purpose of any law is to punish people for breaking it postfactum, you can't preemptively protect anything with law.

>>720620516
The law was designed to stop AI generated CP.
But there are a few lines in there that confused everyone into thinking it bans loli content.
And since these things aren't actually cleared up until a judge rules on it, everyone has to assume the worst case scenario and protect themselves by being overzealous with banning things.

>>720623823
Eh it's your country you should care a little bit

USAnians aren't human, so what? That's not new.
Just look at the walls of text from the pedo spic ITT. He SHOULD be institutionalized.

>>720623742
Fictional depictions of fictional children being statutorybraped by fictional adults. There's hardly a difference if it's a prompt or by human hand. You need to make up your mind on what the purpose of such laws are and start being consistent.

>>720623739
>Bro, I voted for the face-eating leopards, why are they eating my face?

>>720622289
>If it's the former, banning AI generated depictions make absolutely no sense
Nta but it does.
AI generation can be used to create images that look close to real images and you can alter real images in minor ways to make it dubious as to whether or not they are AI.
This puts law enforcement into a bind because they have issues proving whether or not content was created through child abuse.
In turn legislation simply splits the difference and considers AI images just as illegal to avoid this issue.

Now normal governments, so not texans, exclude non-life like depictions because their goal isn't moral policing.

>>720623161
What in the absolute fuck are you talking about?

>>720622002
Just judging by Texas politics, it's an overreaching bill which the presenters are fully behind because they know if anyone votes against it, they can brand them as a pedophile. There was a similar bill passed regarding prayer in schools for Texas recently where the content of the bill wasn't really important, it was to bait democrats into voting against it so republican politicians could label them as anti-Christian and rile up the voting bloc of the state.

It's partly a clever ploy because there is a very logical reason to oppose it (It's vaguely worded and can be used for government overreach) but a practical one not to because it's political suicide in Texas. I'm sure there's a moralist chunk of politicians though that are rubbing their hands together because it's one more victory on the road to a total porn ban or similar.

Regarding dealings in any political arena that receives extensive media coverage, you can expect a lot of bills like this to surface. It's like "common sense" gun regulation being proposed in Washington and those who vote it down being portrayed as supporters of mass shootings--doesn't matter if that's hyperbole, it's what the political ads are going to push and what partisan news organizations will report on.

>>720623859
What is the issue with AI generated CP?
>inb4 deepfakes

>>720621170
No, OP is related to that Texas Anime Ban that just into affect this month.
But to be fair, JAST was banned the day before it the law went into effect, but the chilling effect is 100% intended.
OnlyFans isn't banned, but it's kneecapped due to the fact that Texas also has the porn ID law where to visit adult 18+ sites, you need to give your state ID to the government.
And what could possibly go wrong with giving your ID to look at porn to a group of people who would have no problem blackmailing you?

>>720624179
Did that actually go into effect? I haven't noticed anything's changed. At least not on sites like 4chan and such.

Damn anon
you are gonna get the shit beat out of you in prison

>>720619879 (OP)
Texas is a fucking joke. I'm waiting for the inevitable "That loli is actually 500 years old" defense to be finally used in an official court of law.

>>720623813
>I could go to jail for posession of anime but at least there might not be as many gays or blacks in media
Why is the right so full of scorched earth ideology? So many people are willing to sabotage/compromise their own lives if it means people that don't like also suffer. No, I don't care if this specific example doesn't apply to you, the reader, because you specifically don't like tranime or whatever. I mean in general.

JAST fuck my shit up

>>720623418
Souls don't exist, christcuck.

>>720619879 (OP)
Only two things come from Texas, OP- Steers and queers; and you don't look like a cow!

>>720623891
>it's your country
AHAHAHAHA

>>720624331
Well don't make dei shit and maybe the right would be more sympathetic to you.

>>720624112
If the AI generation is good enough (and the tools are getting there) it could become impossible to tell the difference between an AI-generated image of a child and an actual photograph of a real child who is actually being abused, or those real photographs could be edited slightly to disguise them as AI generated images. This would obviously play all sorts of havoc with law enforcement.

>>720624469
>just forget about your freedom of expression bro, it's that easy

>>720624560
And i have the freedom to call your shit, shit.

Amerimutts will eventually ban every media that doesn't suck off the big nose tribe and nogs lmao

>>720624484
The only real argument against CP is that it gives incentive to abusers to keep producing them. Not only should AI generated CP legal, government should distribute them to reduce real child abuse.

>>720624621
That's not what we're talking about, I've never disputed that, we're talking about you shooting yourself in the foot to own the libs, not critisizing them.

>>720624331
That's just modern political discourse in general, regardless of which side of the fence you're on. Tribalism has grown so strong that people would rather blow their own brains out than cede any ground to the other side. Rightoids are willing to entertain blurring constitutional rights if it means they get to dab on trannies while leftoids are currently sucking on so many sour grapes that they would rather side with the cartels that admit that Trump could have a point.

>>720624469
>>720624565
You know, in a way that does answer my question.

>>720624696
Better than let libs and the left run rampant with their faggotry and alphabet flags.

>>720624560
What do you expect to happen when the majority of the people living in the state think you shouldn't BE free to express something in particular

>>720620516
it is 100% going to end up like Australia

>>720624331
The modern sociopolitical climate is already miserable beyond belief for anyone with even a shred of socially conservative thought. To them, there's no earth of their own left to scorch.

>>720624484
How do you define child abuse photography?
By what is illegal?
Or by certain criteria ie states of undress, types of clothing, poses. Just a child no others or odd acts.
How do you reconcile the fact that there is legal photography of children in various states of undress and erotic posing that has been around for generations now with your position, if applicable? When does it become ok to photograph someone? An age, based on law or?
If its law, why should artsy connected pedophiles be allowed to do it with all manner of children, but other people go to prison for bikini photos of 15 year olds? Is the eva ionesco playboy stuff still technically legal because you know, they have money?
Im always curious to know how others parse all this out, especially when its extremely rare for anyone to go beyond the most surface level emotional signalling on all this nonsense.

>>720619879 (OP)
America hates japan and anime.
The only content fit for american consumption is calarts cartoon, comic books and gun violence

>>720624910
That's because yids are matriarchal and get triggered by products that promote beauty and cool shit aka asian products

>>720624047
I was anticipating this argument and was hoping it would be brought up much latter because I actually agree but I was 100% certain that's not the angle the guy was coming from, and was more interested in exploring his inconsistent framework of values, honestly.

>>720624484
AI tools have a hidden watermark, so its actually very easy to tell what an AI generated image is.

>>720625039
If a watermark is difficult to see, then its easy to erase with some basic filtering

>>720624998
also religious puritanism infecting more and more minds as the years go by

>>720625110
Its part of the image data, and there is zero reason for anyone to try to scrub it in the first place.

>>720625005
>not the angle the guy was coming from
That is probably a fair assessment and yes it is hard not to agree with this argument. The only true issue with it stems from unclear language in the legislation which gives no guidelines for what can be considered "life-like" and thus allows the law to be abused against people that aren't targeting children/benefiting from their exploitation.

>>720624047
I’m not even entirely sure how comfortable I am with the argument
>it would be kinda difficult for the justice system to determine if you were guilty of the crime at a glance, so we’re just making it all illegal

It’s difficult to tell baking soda from powder cocaine at a glance, they don’t make baking soda a Schedule II narcotic to make it easier to bust people in raids.

>>720625145
Buy you could understand why someone would want to fake it right

>>720625317
Those people would be such an incredible tiny number i dont really think its even worth taking seriously. If your trying to goon, as long as it looks good enough i doubt your gonna try to make sure its legit. Or they would even be remotely aware of the watermarks in the first place. Very people are even remotely aware of the imprinted watermark AI tools use.

>>720625391
Also wouldn’t the objective be to insert the watermark, not remove it? Since the objective would be to convince people it WAS AI to avoid prosecution?

>>720625239
I mean sure, but same can go for AI generated depictions of murder, or any other use of AI to depict illegal activity, which could even be used to falsely incriminate certain parties. This should be more of a discussion of AI regulation and transparency rather than just a topic of "ban AI depictions of child porn", which will later branch out into discussions of banning AI depictions of other things, and then you just end up trying to exterminate an ant colony with a drive punch.

>>720624229
Both laws are in affect, but given this is texas, they are selective in how they enforce the law either going after scalps they can claim to show the law is working and they're protecting kids, or using fear to have people impose the bans themselves like you saw with OP, pornhub or Denpasoft, which blocks access to the state since compliance is both costly and risky because if one kid can visit the site, they can be financially ruined by litigation, or criminally prosecuted depending on the state.

>>720625269
That comparison is kind of flawed with baking soda it is easy to analyze, hell you can even drop some water on it to see the difference to cocaine. Hell it's why cops rubbing it on their gums is such a common thing in shows.
The very issue with AI images is that even with an in depth look it can be hard to determine if they are modified real ones or just fakes. That completely de-fangs the government in trying to deal with the issue of child exploitation.

>>720625445
Yes, which is why i said there is zero reason to scrub it out. Thats just a pointless extra step, and does nothing remotely beneficial for you. The AI tools do it for a useful reason. 1 to make sure it obvious its AI, and 2 make sure if your training the ai, you dont feed it stuff it made.

>>720625467
>This should be more of a discussion of AI regulation and transparency
Yes technically it should but sadly that isn't their reasoning behind it. Lawmakers always have their issues.
Doesn't help that everything surrounding AI regulation has tons of issues.
Even more so if we include modified non-AI content. It's not like digital signatures, identifiers etc. can'T be faked.

>>720625508
Most of our government, including the president is actual pedophiles who have actually sexually assaulted minors on Jeffrey Epstein’s island, and nobody’s doing anything about that because of Israeli blackmail.

All I’m saying is sooner or later we’re going to have to figure out how to deal with
>that isn’t real! That’s AI in that photo!” As a way of contradicting evidence, and it’s gonna have to be dealt with in all categories of crime, not just child abuse. It doesn’t make any sense to solve that problem by saying “if we find this evidence, you’re guilty, because we’re criminalizing everything it COULD point to”. That doesn’t solve the problem.

>>720625720
Welp I fucked up that greentext royally. My point however stands

>>720625617
Wouldn't it be easier to just decriminalize it all? Deregulation tends to work with markets, it could work for society

>>720625859
lmao

>>720625720
>sooner or later we’re going to have to figure out how to deal with
I'm not disagreeing it's just that this is a legal can of worms which sucks balls because it can easily lead to government overreach and internet surveillance because tame measures to identify AI content are easily circumvented.

>>720625859
There is little incentive for societies to do so.
Abuse of children is, unsurprisingly, detrimental to them. Which is undesirable because they will be future citizens. And it's not like children can be expected to say or even understand what is going on considering that even adults aren't big on reporting when something is done to them.

>>720625859
obviously yes but boomers are fucking dumb

>>720625498
Any evidence that the government went after Denpasoft? Or did they just be retarded by their own volition? Because nothing in picrel states anybody came for them.

>>720623273
Yeah. So he can get fucked.

>>720619879 (OP)
Land of the free , the free cuck

Imagine living in a state as shitty as Texas

Also Trump is a shit president making everything more expensive

>>720619990
/thread
>>720620316
dilate

>>720619879 (OP)
Why are you posting a tweet from two weeks ago? Maybe conventions don't actually like these people because they abuse copyright, and that's why they were banned? Do you have any evidence of anyone else affected?

Who tf even is this jast

>>720626218
Wew. Fuck JAST.

>>720625005
>I actually agree but I was 100% certain that's not the angle the guy was coming from, and was more interested in exploring his inconsistent framework of values, honestly.
I'm the anon you were questioning my inconsitent framework with. What >>720624047 is the reason behind this law, and its a good reason imo. The problem is how the law was worded, which can be easily misinterpretated due to its intentional vagueness.
I probably did a poor job communicating my stance before, but your responses implied I need to be either for or against the law when I really already laid out my pros and cons with it already. I don't think I was being inconsistent with my values, I was being careful with my wording so you nor others strawman me to destroy my argument (like I saw happening in this thread already). I don't know a solution that fixes the problem.

>>720625498
>either going after scalps they can claim to show the law is working and they're protecting kids
This is you claiming the government proactively went after someone. Who?
>or using fear to have people impose the bans themselves
People being retarded and cutting their own dick off because they don't understand law is not fear. That's just people being retarded.

>>720619879 (OP)
THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF TEXAS

>>720626007
>>720626360
Given they said it was partially because of their lack of compliance with age verification laws that pushed them to block access to every state with the law, there must have been some government interaction, otherwise they wouldn't have mentioned it, nor only block it to states with the law.
Also you're intentionally omitting the first part of my post where it would be used that way, given the whole argument of the law is the protect children. And you can hardly blame people for taking those actions given the criminal punishment, but you're giving the impression you're for the ban.

>>720624852
>How do you define child abuse photography?
The core issue really is that children can't give consent for sexual acts because especially at a young age they won't understand what they're signing up for and the long term psychological damage it will almost assuredly have. There's a lot of variables here with age, type of photography and what the child has to do in the shoot so it's difficult to really have a cut and dry response.
Like having kids pose for swimsuit or waterpark ads even at a young age (<12) shouldn't really ever be an issue as long as there's nothing weird going on behind the scenes, but a kid wearing the same swimsuit in a different context could be seen as sexual abuse if it's some lewd shit. I think any clothed photography with a parent's blessing and/or supervision is fine.
As for completely nude photography, I think it's just better to go with the safe route and say it's all banned for minors. Yes, maybe you could do it for some artsy shit and have it be completely safe for the kids. But I also don't think there's really any gain and there's too much potential for abuse

>>720619879 (OP)
Careful not to point out the obvious hypocrisy from the American conservative establishment re: free speech, that's not a 4chan-approved narrative.

>>720626527
So why just Denpasoft? Shouldn't you have more examples instead of posting the exact same screenshot, the one screenshot you have, for months now?

>>720626592
It's not anybody's fault that you're an idiot believing false narratives.

>>720626347
You tried carefully but your wording betrayed your bias very clearly.
>sickos using AI to create illegal material and being like 'ackually its AI that did it' or 'its not real so its okay :^)'
>The penalty for breaking said law is on equal ground to the actual sickos
You obviously have a moral vendetta against people making AI child porn, on the basis of it being morally reprehensive from your POV. Absolutely no indication was made in your post that your real concern was being unable to tell AI works from works with real victims.

You then go on you voice your actual primary concern, which is that the law could be used against connoisseurs of pedophilic content in anime and manga.

idk sounds like some really weakass backpedaling on your end.

>>720619990
They made the literal greatest hentai games though.
You're just a butthurt zoomer.

>>720626657
>Moving the goalposts
1 is 1 too many.

>>720624350
lmao soulless hylic

>>720625498
effect

>>720623162
They went through a depression episode when decade of translating visual novels made less money than selling a fumo for a week.
Can't really blame them t b h.

>>720619879 (OP)
>Land of the free
>Censors free speech
explain

>>720626718
>You obviously have a moral vendetta against people making AI child porn,
Not him, but yes

>>720619879 (OP)
>>720626728
>JAST
>POPULAR VN DEV
They didn’t make anything, you fucking retard. They’re a shitglish localizer company, the only shit they did was translate the game into English. They’re not VN devs.

>>720626967
Take a fucking guess why they're called JAST USA and not JAST

>child porn
>look inside
>high schoolers

I cannot take these discussions seriously

>>720620516
Main goal was to target AI generated stuff so anime targeting is gonna be more sporadic if it happens, but it could happen due to the law being written in the most retarded way possible

Either way regular manga that isn't porn shouldn't be affected since it doesn't really trigger CP criteria, but it may lead to chilling effects

>>720626718
>You obviously have a moral vendetta against people making AI child porn, on the basis of it being morally reprehensive from your POV. Absolutely no indication was made in your post that your real concern was being unable to tell AI works from works with real victims.
What do you mean? Of course I have a problem with both real and AI.
>You then go on you voice your actual primary concern, which is that the law could be used against connoisseurs of pedophilic content in anime and manga.
No, the problem is that it can be taken out of context because it says "which is said to depict a child, whether ... animated or cartoon depiction" and the word "depict", unless I am being stupid here, is subjective when it comes to cartoons. I could draw a stick figure and theres no age associaed with it, so how old are they really? I would like to assume there is an obvious distinction for everyone but I have also seen people argue anime characters look much younger than they really are, which means that distinction isnt cut and dry for some people. That is my concern here.

>>720620516
Let me explain this to you calmly.
>censorship bad
>government totalitarian control over art bad
No actual children were harmed in drawing these big titty high schoolers

>>720627139
The Japanese JAST went bankrupt in 2001. The only thing left is the US publisher that survived by translating games into English.

>>720626728
>vanilla shit
eew

You have no political allies, whether you're a weeb or gamer or both

>>720621686
You are seriously mocking someone who wants to first assess the information before fully making up his mind. That's how far gone we are.

>right = pro censorship against hot women, "muh satanic" and things they don't like
>left = pro censorship against hot women and things they don't like
Cuckservatives that worship a jew on stick are no better

>>720627557
just wait until the boomers all die

>>720624910
It's the opposite, weebism is becoming much more widespread, which is why we are now seeing backlash. Religious boomers hate it because muh false idols satanism, and feminists hate it because muh beauty standards.

>>720623025

Troons only like certain anime, they can’t stand the based ones like Frieren and K-On.

>>720627557
>intersectional feminiggers on the left
>israel fellating christniggers on the right
>both want to destroy free speech and artistry
God this fucking sucks. I just want to enjoy my anime hotties in peace damn it.

>>720627984

Demon Slayer might be one of the most Christian media I’ve seen in ages, mostly in its themes even of the characters are Japanese.