>>720704016
>You're going back again on ground we've already covered
You didn't cover shit. I explained why you are wrong but you are too smooth brained to understand or too demented to remember.
>If you want ES6 to be a purely turn-based RPG then that's fine
Strawman, I never advocated for it being turn based.
>ES games are not pure RPGs and they have not been for a long time
Being real time, contrary to turn based doesn't make it less of an RPG nor it does make it more action based. Morrowind is the proof of this. Is completely real time and yet is a perfectly fine RPG with stats and even hit chance. It's completely skill-less slop, as you would say, only exception I think is archery but you always miss if your character doesn't have enough skill in marksman. Therefore your idea of "it's real time, therefore it tries to actually be an ARPG but fails", it's flawed and wrong.
Since oblivion they have tried to cater to this public, it's true, but even if they succeeded, that would have been a detachment from what the elder scrolls series is at its core, which is what you fail to understand. No, ES wasn't an ARPG franchise, it's a real time RPG franchise. It tried the action part a little bit with new entries and failed and that's it. You want it to be another thing, which is ok, but it's just your capricious feelings and nothing else, no game design marvel or logic behind.
>It's going to be even MORE of an action game than Skyrim, and my wish is for them to actually support that decision
Speaking of lack of imagination, lmao. Yeah, you are so creative, accepting what it will probably happen and wishing for the best, instead of, you know, using your imagination and thinking about the best possible scenario, which is todd getting fired and the series going back to its roots.