>>720715170 (OP) >best consumer graphics card on the market currently can barely crack 100 FPS average >in fucking 1080p
what the fuck is modern vidya man
>>720715590 >dude, those frames are "fake"! Never mind that it doesn't matter because the end result is the same, they are "fake" therefore they are bad!!!!!!!!!!
Why are people like this? What the fuck do I care if the frames are "fake" if it looks and feels like 120fps, but without it it would be 80 at best?
>>720715170 (OP) >gimp all your cards but gimp your competitors harder >just in time for the new gpu release next year
havent we seen this exact scenario play out like 10 over times by now
>>720716538
buying a modern 80 card is asking to get scammed
this reminds me of the day i went to the computer store when rtx5080 launched and the few people who bought 5080s were kids using their parents' money
>>720716030
I've had a 4090 for 2 years, please tell me about how I never experienced it. Projecting much?
But actually that makes sense. The "fake frame" idiots are the ones who don't even own a 4000 series card so they never even tried frame generation, so how the hell would they know what the fuck they are talking about?
>>720716746
interpolation is literally nothing new, maybe it is to you, but it has and always will be shit, thanks for pointing out that you are retarded nigger moron
>>720716813
amd pulled a uno reverse by making their first gaming focused uarch gpu for the first time in a while
nvidia's AI focused blacked well just cant compete with a real gaming gpu uarch
>>720716813 >9070xt that close to a 4090 >9070xt above a 4080 super >7900xtx on par with a 4080 >7800xt basically matching a 3090
Yeah this is a complete fabrication. Makes sense why advanced marketers proper up this channel.
>>720716910
the gaps between top NVIDIA and top AMD are a lot larger once they hit 4K with the Badass settings, that one seems a lot more feasible, but I really wouldn't put it past something with this game to be utterly fucked somehow, and 4K chokes everybody anyway. ONLY in the 1440p range AMD doesn't choke.
>>720716994
No other reviewer gets such results and doesn't happen in any other game. Hey ho though, made-up bullshit must be true because....ughh.....FUCK NVIDIA
>>720716054 >I'm a dishonest nigger
Crytek made the best looking photo realistic game by a long shot in 2007 which required extremely powerful hardware at the time.
Meanwhile Bordershit looks like a late ps4 title at best yet runs like dogshit
>>720717079
Anon, most people are using the Badass for testing. Medium seems to be some weird spot where AMD equals up to the ante, but you hit the near-max at the same resolution and NVIDIA starts inching it out at that level, and only barely. The margins for differences are actually so little that it's not that surprising.
>>720716746
dude forget about it, it's just ayymdtrannies and jeets with 1050s who think that dlss 4 looks the same as dlss 1 lol
I recently tried the new "smooth motion" thing and nvidia just proved again that they are the innovators and niggers gonna hate nvidias framegen even though they never tried it
>>720719802
i've had rtx4090 and rtx5090 and only had to use it when coping with bad frames in portal RTX
its better than nothing i guess but i would have preferred having real frames without FG cope
>>720715826 >literally has less visual features than previous games >literally has the same texture quality as previous games >models are exactly the same quality as previous games >gives you 1/4 the framerate as previous games
>>720722665 >500w to compete with a 300w card AND lacks actual features like working opengl and dlss
Nobody would've bought it and people who say they would are liars as the last 10 years of market share proves.
