Thread 723077326

Just got this bad boy, can't wait to play Monster Hunter Wilds at 4K 144fps

How about 1080p 60FPS?

Temper your expectations, you are CPU bottlenecked there and in most AAA today. That's why they're pushing frame generation so much. They can't hit high Framerate at 1080p so they fake it.

>>723077357
>>723077383
are you telling me I spent 2000 dollars for nothing

>>723077450
CPU matters, what is yours?

>>723077450
No

t. Played MH wilds at 720p 30fps after lossless scaling

>>723077450
$2000 on what? Assembling Legos is childs play. If you want the performance you need to optimize the user space. (You) the user, are you good enough for this? Do you know the difference between ACO compiler and LLVM? Knowing the difference means you get double the Framerate.

>>723077450
no, you did good if you want 4k gaming. CPU bottleneck only happens for spergs playing at 1080p for 500 FPS

>>723077543
i5-7500

>>723077543
Core i7

>>723077680
Yikes... You need a 9800X3D for MH Wilds...

>>723077680
the card is going to be held back by your CPU. you need an i7 minimum

>>723077767
Not just good CPU but also highly tuned ram. Most faggots here run garbage expo/XMP sub timings. Nobody knows what trfc or trefi are but it's the biggest perf bump in MH

>Intel CPU
>AMD GPU

>>723077326 (OP)
>>723077450
Stick with consoles Jit

>>723077543
7800x3d

>>723077605
lol that gpu is not doing 4k 144fps on Wilds

>>723077729
LOL

>>723077326 (OP)
>amd
Hahahahaha

>>723077868
I fucked up and got 5600 DDR5 on my latest build

>>723078291
AMD isn't bad anymore, it has steadily been getting better. If anything NVIDIA has started to shit the bed with their pricing and drivers.

>>723077450
Why would you buy a midrange gpu for 4k at any framerate target, let alone 120+?

>>723078831
>AMD isn't bad anymore
>he doesn't know about path tracing

>>723077326 (OP)
why would you waste your time playing that?
play other games

>>723077326 (OP)
>he fell for the 4k meme

>>723078913
I don't care about that shit.

>>723079042
You will when every game is either that or potato graphics. That's where games are going simply because it's easier and cheaper to develop

>>723077326 (OP)
1440p is the only reasonable resolution in 2025. 1080p is too blurry since everything is TAA now and 4K is too hard to run at high framerates. I don't think 4K at anything higher than 60 fps will be realistically viable for another 5-10 years, especially if the current trend of terrible game optimization continues.

>>723077326 (OP)
A 9070xt doesnt even qualify as a bare minimum card these days

>>723077868
Fucking around with trfc and trefi is the biggest waste of time if you are doing it for a garbage game like Milds that looks like shit regardless.

>>723079223
>1080p is too blurry since everything is TAA now
That's why you use Trans DLSS or DLAA

>>723079103
I only play Japslop designed for antiquated hardware that uses ancient rendering techniques anyway.

>>723079321
DLAA is still blurry compared to MSAA or SMAA of old.

>>723078291
>>723078913
>AMD thread
>look inside
>nvidia shills talking about tech that no one uses
path tracing? why dont you try tracing the path to some pussy instead

>>723079368
No it's not, you're on a 10 year old gpu and haven't used it before

>>723079424
I was on a 3060 at 1080p, it felt like I was playing games without glasses on these days. Now on my new build at 1440p new games look like how games used to in terms of sharpness and clarity.

>>723079402
You know what else no one uses? AMD gpus

>>723077326 (OP)
Have fun when AMD will release FSR 5 and it won't be compatible with that GPU lmao

>>723079654
I do so your argument is invalid. My personal experience is better than some faggy graph.

Hey I wanted this card too. So what's a good CPU that goes alongside it?

>>723077326 (OP)
>can't wait to play Monster Hunter Wilds at 4K 144fps

>>723079727
Well I play games with path tracing, ray reconstruction, and framegen, so get dunked on loser.

>>723077450
It's just the standard contrarian Nvidia trolls.

>>723079760
Don't. RDNA4 is going to age like RDNA1 vs Turing (badly)

>>723079787
Don't care about that shit. Give me a game that looks like HL2 I'll be happy.

>>723079223
>I don't think 4K at anything higher than 60 fps will be realistically viable for another 5-10 years
We'll never get this because game performance worsens faster than technology can keep up.

>>723080618
That's true, I'm mostly talking about being able to brute force the games of today in a few years on more powerful hardware.

>>723077326 (OP)
>600 bucks for a graphics card
For what purpose, you can get a PC that lasts you the next full decade for like 1400 max, the whole thing.

I bought a pre built with a 9070xt, 9800X3D, 32GB of Ram, 2TB NVME, and Gold 850W PSU for $1,899. Did I get ripped off?

>>723081276
Not a bad ripoff, you paid a few hundred over DYI for assembly, which isn't the most egregious.

>>723079402
he was the jeet in the other gpu thread that immediately abandoned it when benchmarks showing the 2nd fastest nvidia gpu(4090) ran cyberpunk path tracing at 19 fps

>>723082265
>$3,000 graphics card can barely do 60fps on 1080p
Where did we go so wrong? What the fuck even is path tracing?

>>723082265
>1080p for 3000 dollars
lol thanks for proving my point, stop using path tracing a setting that exists in one game as a tech demo to shill your shitty nvidia garbage faggot

No computer assembled with currently available consumer components is capable of running Wilds at a stable 144 FPS at any resolution.

>>723082495
>What the fuck even is path tracing?
Raytracing 2.

>>723082495
Ray tracing with a lot more ‘bounces’ of light. It’s basically a huge performance hog for something that could’ve been baked in had games today not add pointless day/night cycles.

now we can play big vidya

>>723077543
N4500

>>723079243
if you have hynixis super damn easy. if it doesn't boot under 400trfc you dont have a-die. if it doesn't boot under 450trc you dont have hynix at all.

>>723077450
No, it's still a great GPU. Just certain games like Wilds and Dragon's Dogma 2 are CPU bottlenecked so having a great GPU won't help. Plus, since you're on AMD and not Nvidia, PhysX should still work for you so you can enjoy older titles at their absolute best.

>>723077605
>no, you did good if you want 4k gaming