>>723189886
Daily reminder that there are no good arguments against normalization of incest.
>muh birth defects!
Humanity is fully capable of producing broken children without incest, as we allow old people and people with screwed up genetics to breed without problem. It's funny how normalfags will clap and cheer when fucked up kids that will live a short life of suffering enter this world but the mere mention of eugenics turns them into extreme eugenics supporters. Also the risk of birth defects from incest is overblown compared to regular risks associated with normal reproduction.
>It's abuse! Molestation! Rape!
Should we ban sex completely then? There are millions of various cases of rape, sexual abuse, exploitation or people getting manipulated into sex every month. And the argument doesn't apply when it's two consenting related people having sex with each other with full awareness of what's happening.
>it-it's wrong! It's disgusting!
Not an argument. People do a shit-ton of actually disgusting or morally questionable shit like scat, abusing the partner in bed or diaper sex but you'll get called a "moralfag" or "puritan" if you say that it's nasty. Meanwhile 2 related people being into each other is too much?
>you don't have a sibling!!!
Actually, I do, and so do most people who are into incest.
>siblings are incapable of being attracted to each other!!!
More than enough various cases, confessions and stories that prove you wrong.
>Uh... I...!!!
Case closed.