Thread 723200542

>negative review with low hours
>”you didn’t even give it a chance”
>negative review with high hours
>”well why did you play it so much if you didn’t like it?”

Ratbros ww@?

>negative review with middling hours, hoping the game would improve after going past refund window
>"so you got your money's worth then?"

>don’t like game
>decide that if I want to give it a totally fair review I should 100% it to make sure I’ve seen it all
>give detailed review with examples and reasoning for my review
>nobody looks at it
>some random meme review from a guy with 2 hours
>4000 updoots

most people are not worthy of earnest engagement, they are either dumb or bad faithers

>>723200542 (OP)
Both of those responses are just cope for retards who feel the need to defend shit games online.

>>723200768
I appreciate reviews like yours. I read them, I just don’t react or anything. Maybe I should start doing that so they know

>>723200542 (OP)
both are right if they don't give an actual reason

>game is shit
>"filtered"

>positive review with low hours
>I can't put this game down! I'm going to play nothing but this game forever!
>0.4 hours on record, 6 years ago

>>723202129
they were unfortunately killed