← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 723248016

230 posts 72 images /v/
Anonymous No.723248016 >>723248128 >>723248258 >>723248317 >>723248392 >>723248526 >>723248657 >>723248754 >>723248961 >>723248987 >>723249075 >>723249208 >>723249276 >>723249385 >>723249674 >>723249790 >>723249806 >>723249879 >>723249908 >>723249915 >>723249949 >>723250014 >>723250025 >>723250370 >>723250582 >>723251378 >>723253345 >>723253445 >>723253614 >>723254226 >>723254419 >>723254425 >>723254780 >>723255021 >>723255169 >>723255913 >>723256132 >>723256661 >>723258037 >>723258862 >>723259484 >>723259797 >>723260425 >>723260557 >>723260798 >>723261216 >>723261485 >>723262570 >>723262640 >>723262694 >>723262921 >>723263404 >>723263634 >>723263804 >>723264507 >>723264717 >>723264753 >>723264769 >>723265067 >>723265273 >>723267365
VTMB2 PC REQUIREMENTS
JUST
Anonymous No.723248128 >>723265016
>>723248016 (OP)
looks reasonable?
Anonymous No.723248164 >>723252067 >>723262058 >>723262694
>30g
how long is this game?
Anonymous No.723248241 >>723261273 >>723265491
>60fps
this ain't the bronze age anymore come on man
Anonymous No.723248258
>>723248016 (OP)
I'm good to go then. I thought the requirements were going to be insane
Anonymous No.723248317 >>723249259
>>723248016 (OP)
What's the point of releaing requirements for a game literally everyone can see will be garbage? Nobody is buying it anyway so
Anonymous No.723248392
>>723248016 (OP)
low requirements very nice
Anonymous No.723248418 >>723248604 >>723257148 >>723260204
Nobody cares.
Anonymous No.723248526 >>723250793 >>723262058
>>723248016 (OP)
>30gb
Seems strange to see such comparatively tiny file size
Anonymous No.723248604
>>723248418
Nobody cares about your crippling obsession, faggot. Keep it up.
Anonymous No.723248657 >>723248741 >>723249947
>>723248016 (OP)
Is this going to be the first well optimized UE5 game?
Anonymous No.723248741 >>723250104 >>723253601 >>723253948 >>723259536
>>723248657
I thought Robocop and E33 were well optimized.
Anonymous No.723248754 >>723262058
>>723248016 (OP)
>30gb
8 to 12 hour long game filled with dialogue
epic
Anonymous No.723248771 >>723249059 >>723249185 >>723249205 >>723258508
when the heckerino did 5600x become the bare minimum?
im on 3600x how is that already obsolete
Anonymous No.723248852
nice i thought it would be way higher
Anonymous No.723248961
>>723248016 (OP)
>with DLSS Perf for 60fps

The absolute state of PC gaming
Anonymous No.723248987 >>723258192
>>723248016 (OP)
>mfw 1440p rtx 5080 amd ryzen 9 9950x3d
Anonymous No.723249059
>>723248771
telemetry, same as why 7 runs better than 10
Anonymous No.723249075 >>723249506
>>723248016 (OP)
Works fine on my Gateway
Anonymous No.723249185
>>723248771
>High CPU demand
>NPCs logic worse than games from 20 years ago
Classic nu-dev bamboozle.
Anonymous No.723249205 >>723249615
>>723248771
AM4 was dogshit for vido gaymes until the x3d came out.
Anonymous No.723249208 >>723249331
>>723248016 (OP)
>not even a single section for ultra settings at 1080/1440/2160 without fake frames or blurry ass performance mode DLSS
grim
Anonymous No.723249227
Why does it require Windows 11? What does W11 have that W10 doesn't?
Anonymous No.723249259 >>723249376 >>723255890 >>723264170
>>723248317
dunno
Anonymous No.723249276
>>723248016 (OP)
>fake frames
>60fps
loool
Anonymous No.723249331
>>723249208
Ultra setting likely ramped up too much gay tracing to work at native resolution.
Anonymous No.723249376 >>723249568
>>723249259
one of the worst game in gaming history runs better than paraslop
i have a really ominous feeling about eu5
Anonymous No.723249385
>>723248016 (OP)
30GB LOOOOOOOOOL
its over, 6 hour shooter confirmed. all dialogue options are fake and have no consequences
Anonymous No.723249487
I'm good for 4k 60fps.
Shame it is only 60fps.
Anonymous No.723249506
>>723249075
My 2002 eMachine will run this no problem!
Anonymous No.723249568
>>723249376
I'm most worried about the slowdown. Vicky 3 grinds to al halt with all the pops after like 50 years
Anonymous No.723249615
>>723249205
Um actually the 5000 series was better than the Intel 10th/11th series which were current at the time.
Anonymous No.723249674 >>723249815 >>723249818
>>723248016 (OP)
GTX 1080 bros... We're barely surviving
Anonymous No.723249686 >>723249751
>5800x3d
Either they are bruteforcing cpu performance by leaning on the cache or they just pulled a cpu out of their rectum. 50/50 odds on which.
Anonymous No.723249751 >>723250060
>>723249686
Maybe they just didn't test on am5
Anonymous No.723249790 >>723249898
>>723248016 (OP)
>Windows 2
Excuse me????
Anonymous No.723249806 >>723249898
>>723248016 (OP)
>Windows II
What?
Anonymous No.723249815
>>723249674
You've been barely surviving in AAA for like 5 years now. Fucking vega is more usable than pascal now, at least it can play doom tda and Indy
Anonymous No.723249818
>>723249674
the 1080TI was a god card though
Anonymous No.723249879 >>723250192
>>723248016 (OP)
It looks great though?
I have a base 5070 and I'll be able to run it at max settings in 2K. And even a fucking 1060 can run it
Anonymous No.723249898 >>723253082 >>723255979
>>723249790
>>723249806
It's binary so it's 3
Anonymous No.723249908
>>723248016 (OP)
>my 2012 PC cant reach 60fps
wow its shit
Anonymous No.723249915
>>723248016 (OP)
>CPU+ram probably able to run three instances of it simultaneous and still not even get toasty
>GPU won't hit 30 fps
Updating your PC components gradually makes for some interesting gaming
Anonymous No.723249947 >>723260075
>>723248657
No, it's pretty much guaranteed to run like shit.
The only well-optimized UE5 games are The Finals, Split Fiction, and Fantasy Life i (I don't even know if I'd count that since it's going for a super simple aesthetic, I genuinely thought it was UE4), and none of those games use UE5's flagship features (nanite and lumen).
Anonymous No.723249949
>>723248016 (OP)
GPU requirements look suspiciously low for a UE5 game.
>30GB
So this game is very short, huh.
Anonymous No.723250014 >>723250235
>>723248016 (OP)
Hmm, are CPU requirement usually that low? What games recently have a high CPU requirement anyways?
Anonymous No.723250025 >>723250273
>>723248016 (OP)
>4070
>with dlss and framegen to hit 60 at """4k""
>meaning it hits 30fps at 720p
Lmao, I hate modern gaming so much
Anonymous No.723250060
>>723249751
Which is also absolute insanity.
>hey we didn't test on the most popular current platform because we didn't feel like it so our suggested cpu is an unobtanium one lolz
Anonymous No.723250104 >>723250273 >>723250302
>>723248741
Fuck no.
Anonymous No.723250192 >>723261615
>>723249879
>It looks great though?
Does it?
It looks like a UE4 game from 2017.
Actually, I might even argue it looks worse than that.
Anonymous No.723250235
>>723250014
it runs on xbox series s and that console is only slightly better than switch 2 which is a ARM handheld.
Anonymous No.723250273 >>723250620
>>723250025
retard learn to read, it's 4k quality not ultra performance
looks like you could just do balanced dlss and hit 60fps before fg
>>723250104
Name a game you think is optimized
Anonymous No.723250302 >>723250620
>>723250104
Closest that I have seen UE5 coming close to being optimized so far is Grounded 2.
E33 runs like ass with a valium suppository in comparison
Anonymous No.723250370
>>723248016 (OP)
>only have w10
It's over...
Anonymous No.723250582 >>723252436 >>723255875
>>723248016 (OP)
>RTX 5080 for 60FPS (fake 240 with 4x multiplier) at 1080p rendering (DLSS Performance at 4k is 1080p in reality)
Holy fucking lmao, this shit looks like an absolute dumpster fire. Imagine needing a 5080 for 1080p 60FPS.
Anonymous No.723250620
>>723250273
>Name a game you think is optimized
Resident Evil 4 Remake. Doom Eternal.

>>723250302
E33 looks like pure blurry ass no matter what hardware you have. Everything is caked in UE5's generic material editor.
Anonymous No.723250793 >>723251067 >>723262058
>>723248526
That just means invisible walls up the yin yang. The city is probably only 3 or 4 streets like a Yakuza game
Anonymous No.723251067
>>723250793
>implying you need more
Anonymous No.723251378
>>723248016 (OP)
Is this game shilled only here? Nobody outside 4chan even know they got back from the rewriting announcement.
Anonymous No.723252067
>>723248164
10hr story 20h with side content
Anonymous No.723252436
>>723250582
the consequence of jeets
Anonymous No.723252462 >>723252759
Graphics don't mean shit in a game. It's gameplay first!
Anonymous No.723252637
>>723252174
Yeah, i'll be cautiously optimistic since CDPR has a good track record so far but the way they've been bleeding talent to retirement or Blank and Rebel Wolves. I definitely would hope for a good game but I'm not going to hold my breath really
Anonymous No.723252759
>>723252462
That is why text adventures remain the best games.
Anonymous No.723253082
>>723249898
>Windows 3.II
Anonymous No.723253345
>>723248016 (OP)
What the hell, that's unexpected..
Big if true, i'll actually buy it just for having 8gbs ram on system requirements.
But i will wait for the release and see gameplay, i don't trust these bitches
Anonymous No.723253445
>>723248016 (OP)
Compared to many recent games this is reasonable
Anonymous No.723253485
Let me guess, its UE5? You can tell because those requirements are grossly inflated for what the game looks like. The game easily looks like a bog standard PS4 AA title.
Anonymous No.723253529
Nice watch, nerd
Anonymous No.723253601 >>723253751
>>723248741
Agreed on Robocop. Ran very well, and also is one of the best looking titles ever made.
Anonymous No.723253614
>>723248016 (OP)
I expected worse from the UE5 game.
Happy to see that at least they optimized the game somewhat.
Anonymous No.723253751 >>723254197
>>723253601
>one of the best looking titles ever made.
Every character that isn't at least 90% metal looks godawful.
Anonymous No.723253781 >>723253994 >>723254045 >>723258360
>30gigs
So the game is either tiny or the devs learned about this ancient technique called "asset compression."
Anonymous No.723253948
>>723248741
Not open-world games stupid retard.
Anonymous No.723253994
>>723253781
Sadly we all know which case is more likely
Anonymous No.723254045
>>723253781
Unless they used new Nvidia AI shit, no way they compressed the game that much.
Anonymous No.723254197 >>723257569
>>723253751
What looks bad about them?
Anonymous No.723254226 >>723254378 >>723254603 >>723254887 >>723255745 >>723257224
>>723248016 (OP)
the game looks like this btw
Anonymous No.723254378
>>723254226
>ps3 graphics
nice
Anonymous No.723254419 >>723255045
>>723248016 (OP)
I'm surprised the minimum is that low. What engine is it on?
Anonymous No.723254425
>>723248016 (OP)
>extended sys reqs
Pure mental retardation.
Anonymous No.723254603 >>723254905 >>723255745
>>723254226
And this is Robocop on a 1070.
Anonymous No.723254780
>>723248016 (OP)
It's gonna run like shit anyway.
Anonymous No.723254887 >>723255126
>>723254226
Unreal Engine 3 was always my favorite
Anonymous No.723254905
>>723254603
Looks about the same.
Anonymous No.723254941
I'm surprised devs are sticking with recommending 16GB RAM, I know it's never explicitly stated but with the ammount of caching going on I definitely noticed improvements going up to 64
Anonymous No.723255021
>>723248016 (OP)
>Windows 11
Not playing that leftist shit.
Anonymous No.723255045
>>723254419
If you turn off the 20+ post processing effects you could run it on a phone
Anonymous No.723255126 >>723256351
>>723254887
Starbreeze Engine
Anonymous No.723255169
>>723248016 (OP)
meh. unoptimized. static lighting game doesnt need ue5. actually no games need ue5. if this was on ue4 it would be running at 300 fps with the same graphics.
Anonymous No.723255745
>>723254603
>not hiding behind fog because you know your game looks good
based

>>723254226
>hiding behind fog because game looks like shit with ps2 assets and nothing to show off
s_yjak game
Anonymous No.723255875
>>723250582
The 1080p of 4K DLSS Performance looks infinitely better than actual raw 1080p.
Anonymous No.723255890
>>723249259
thought this was the same image at first
all these graphic design templates look the same
Anonymous No.723255913
>>723248016 (OP)
>5600x
>rx 9070
>1440 monitor
yup, its gayman tiem
btw how can retards not afford a decent rig? Just get a job.
Anonymous No.723255979
>>723249898
Windows 2 Episode 2
Anonymous No.723256132
>>723248016 (OP)
I don't see what's the problem or I'm forced to call you a poorfag because you don't have 5 year old hardware?
Anonymous No.723256241
I'm good to go but it looks fucking terrible so I will not be playing it.
Anonymous No.723256341
everyone is so used to the gigabloat of AAA games seeing 30 gigs raises eyebrows
it's either gonna be a visual novel with only one city zone, or a really short action game with only the one city zone.
Anonymous No.723256351
>>723255126
Fuck.
Anonymous No.723256443 >>723256518
>made one cute nerdy girl
>she's most likely a bait and switch villain
for fuck's sake
Anonymous No.723256518 >>723256838
>>723256443
which one?
Anonymous No.723256661 >>723256806 >>723258839
>>723248016 (OP)
>Recommended specs are a 4 year old low end GPU and CPU
Oh Lord this is truly the end.
Anonymous No.723256806
>>723256661
kinda fits with how the game is like half a decade late
Anonymous No.723256838
>>723256518
Safia
Anonymous No.723257148
>>723248418
>Obsessed over the success of a video game
You are such a loser.
Anonymous No.723257224
>>723254226
looks comfy
Anonymous No.723257553
I'm way above specs, but 1080p/60hz is good enough for me.
So good to go I guess.
One week. Can't wait. However stupid it may be, i'm actually feeling eager to finally get my hands on the game.
Anonymous No.723257569
>>723254197
Not him, but the human skin looked pretty bad in well-lit indoor areas from what I remember. Looked much, much better than E33 at least.
Anonymous No.723258037
>>723248016 (OP)
1060 6GB bros we cannot stop fucking winning
Anonymous No.723258192
>>723248987
same except 9800x3d
Anonymous No.723258360
>>723253781
The DLCs contains the other 70gb.
Anonymous No.723258508
>>723248771
a 5600 is like 50 bucks and way faster than a 3600. no reason to still be on that.
Anonymous No.723258839 >>723258936 >>723263089 >>723263184
>>723256661
Most anons have a pc that is close to a decade old so these requirements are plain bullshit.
Anonymous No.723258862
>>723248016 (OP)
That is super normal.
Recommended specs are a several years old mid tier card, minimum is a 10 year old mid tier card.
This is conservative if anything.
Anonymous No.723258936
>>723258839
the minimum specs are mid range from a decade ago
Anonymous No.723259068
>Windows 11
Anonymous No.723259484
>>723248016 (OP)
What is that bullshit in the extended, an ad for shitty njudea features?
Anonymous No.723259536
>>723248741
>E33
It's not the most egregious example of bad UE5 optimization, but it sure as hell wasn't good. this one looks weirdly fine though(still bad, but almost within reason).
Anonymous No.723259797
>>723248016 (OP)
>DLSS + Fucking Graphics 2X
>DLSS + Mother Fucking Graphics 4X
hot damn
Anonymous No.723260075
>>723249947
You can include Pseudoregalia as well, but that's a UE5 game trying to emulate the look of a N64 game.
Anonymous No.723260130
It's gonna be great
Anonymous No.723260204
>>723248418
It's anti-shill anon!
Anonymous No.723260425 >>723260568
>>723248016 (OP)
convinced AMD/Nvidia have a slush fund for AAA companies to artificially drive up minimum requirements so the latest SKUs always sell
Anonymous No.723260467
Can't wait to pirate
Anonymous No.723260557
>>723248016 (OP)
>dlss and framegen in the system requirements details
It's dogshit, Jim.
Also what is going on there with the Windows 10/11 shit? If it runs on Windows 10 than it should just said "Windows 10 64-bit minimum" and not have an entire line in the chart loosely implying things about the OS.
Anonymous No.723260568 >>723260965
>>723260425
but the minimum requirements are 10 year old low end parts, and at 1080p...
Anonymous No.723260747 >>723261101
>3070+3600x for 1440p
that's exactly my pc and monitor then cool. What engine is it? It seems way too reasonable if it's ue5
Anonymous No.723260798 >>723260902
>>723248016 (OP)
I hope that win11 recommendation means 24H2 isn't going to fuck me up the ass yet again
Anonymous No.723260902 >>723261050
>>723260798
I hope you like your ass being loose for the next few months. It's gonna be big, rough, and go for multiple rounds.
Anonymous No.723260965 >>723261101 >>723261368
>>723260568
at the lowest settings probably dipping below 30fps*
Anonymous No.723261050 >>723261382
>>723260902
yeah yeah I already heard 25H2 didn't fix the whole system freeze meme some games had
Anonymous No.723261101
>>723260747
It is ue5
Maybe it's like silent hill f where they rename the presets so that ultra ingame is equivalent to medium in almost every other ue5 game. Lock away epic settings to people willing to edit a cfg tweak, cut down on poorfag seethe and refund requests.
>>723260965
Sounds good to me, maybe don't hold on to budget components for a decade.
Anonymous No.723261216
>>723248016 (OP)
>DLSS Frame Generation set to 2x
Anonymous No.723261273 >>723261489 >>723263514 >>723264913 >>723265230
>>723248241
who tf plays at more than 60 FPS?
Anonymous No.723261291
>manipulative image implying that Microbloatยฎ Shitdownsยฉ 11 is better than 10 and doesn't just make everything slower because it needs 16 Gb RAM for its own always-online spy/bloatware
>people unironically believe it
Anonymous No.723261368 >>723261462 >>723262757
>>723260965
What the fuck do you expect, to be able to max everything on a 1060 for the rest of your life?
Anonymous No.723261382
>>723261050
You expect the small indie studio to fix their operating system? Shame on you. Rajeet can only work 17 hours a day prompting AI. You want to make him work overtime?
Anonymous No.723261462 >>723261530
>>723261368
at 1080p you should, yes
Anonymous No.723261485 >>723261608
>>723248016 (OP)
how can this shitty looking game be this demanding?
Anonymous No.723261489
>>723261273
Indians who enjoy playing vidya while listening to sounds of jet engines revving next to their ears. Probably related to their fascination with trains.
Anonymous No.723261530 >>723261643
>>723261462
no you shouldn't this is fucking retarded, PC gaming isn't for you, stick to consoles
Anonymous No.723261608 >>723262529
>>723261485
>this demanding
Man I shutter to imagine the piece of shit the brown denizens are using as a daily driver
Anonymous No.723261615 >>723262182
>>723250192
Looks pretty ok given the state of the industry. For reference what I consider looking "good" is visual clarity and high contrast, which was lost somewhere around 2000s.
Anonymous No.723261643 >>723261965
>>723261530
>noo you GOT to pay the kiketax+H1b tip
lol
Anonymous No.723261859 >>723262015
>he doesn't update his pc
Anonymous No.723261867 >>723262093
Why the hell have people actually started using the term "2K" when it isnt even close to 25601440p and a 1080p would be a 2k monitor if a 2160p is a 4k monitor, maybe I'm autistic.
Anonymous No.723261965 >>723262526 >>723262740 >>723262849 >>723263791
>>723261643
the cool thing about PC gaming is you have thousands and thousands of other older games and indies games you can continue to play on your atrocious rig, so why don't you do that instead of whining and demanding to be catered to in every thread about a new release, I want to see actual advancements in games not held back by people with GPUs that were shit 8 years ago
Anonymous No.723262015 >>723262276 >>723262484
>>723261859
You know optimisation implies the game should look better
Anonymous No.723262058 >>723262952
>>723248164
>>723248526
>>723248754
>>723250793
Storage size has nothing to do with length. It has everything to do with optimization. AI upscaled textures, ai upscaled cutscenes, forcing everybody to download language audio files for every language under the sun including swahili, uncompressed audio, etc.
Anonymous No.723262093
>>723261867
Marketing magiks, just a spell that used to work better on TV buyers
Anonymous No.723262182 >>723262378 >>723262409 >>723262478 >>723262979
>>723261615
>For reference what I consider looking "good" is visual clarity and high contrast
Then you must think this game looks like shit, because it's not a visually clear game, by design.
Anonymous No.723262276 >>723262539
>>723262015
It is just impossible with obsolete tech. You cant run a 4K game on an integrated intel gpu either
Anonymous No.723262378
>>723262182
>icons and size look like they were made for a touchscreen
Anonymous No.723262409
>>723262182
It's not real because you use a dlss/frame generation so it doesn't count
Anonymous No.723262478
>>723262182
This looks worse than The Division, a game that will be literally a decade old in about 5 months.
Anonymous No.723262484
>>723262015
optimization means that it runs better. not that it looks better.
Anonymous No.723262526
>>723261965
>but my prooogress
There is no fucking excuse to suddenly need more power for the same resolution, you can beg for your "2 fps moar plz" at the UPPER range of output, not at the lower one
Anonymous No.723262529 >>723263370
>>723261608
fuck off, there's no way this shit should be this demanding and you know it. and i'm referring to the 4k ultra settings now, just so you now, not 1080p high potato mode.
Anonymous No.723262539 >>723262749
>>723262276
Yeah but you can run 4k video because the formats aren't jeeted
Anonymous No.723262570
>>723248016 (OP)
Does anyone even care? We're 6 days from release and it's what? Barely cracking the top 40 in sellers,?
It flopped.
Games looked bad and it lacked attractive women
Anonymous No.723262640
>>723248016 (OP)
holy fucking shit. I know these charts are almost always bullshit, but it's still grim as hell.
Anonymous No.723262694
>>723248016 (OP)
>60fps on a 2 generation old low range card
what's just about it?
>>723248164
why tf do you think length has anything to do with file size? is this a zoomer myth?
Anonymous No.723262740
>>723261965
>I want to see actual advancements in games not held back by people with GPUs that were shit 8 years ago
Faggots like you have been purchasing the latest hardware as soon as it gets released and games have only looked worse
Anonymous No.723262749 >>723263015
>>723262539
Videos are pre-rendered, meaning it takes a lot less procesding power. Decoding is a whole different matter.
Anonymous No.723262757
>>723261368
When the games look like (or worse than) games from ten years ago, yeah. The requirements shouldn't magically go up when the visuals stay the same.
Anonymous No.723262849
>>723261965
>I want to see actual advancements in games not held back by people with GPUs that were shit 8 years ago
Okay, but we're not getting that, this game doesn't look better than games from 2018, so where's the progress exactly outside of selling more graphics cards to retards?
Anonymous No.723262921
>>723248016 (OP)
pretty good
Anonymous No.723262952
>>723262058
This particular story-focused game is going to have a lot of voice lines, and it sure as hell is not optimized. It's going to be a 5 hour "experience" at best.
Anonymous No.723262979 >>723263107
>>723262182
"by design"
no lmao its just RETARD developers sticking to the ue5 defaults because all ue5 games look like SHIT without the catastrophic fog they fucking use all the time
Anonymous No.723263015
>>723262749
You're missing the point, you can apply same logic to video games but unlike with streaming video games are have disregarded technological improvements that could provide more performance or they're stop gap solutions like AI
Anonymous No.723263089 >>723263171 >>723263406
>>723258839
i know you're posting from brazil or indonesia but most anons are white tech workers
Anonymous No.723263107
>>723262979
No, I mean it looks to take place in Seattle in the winter, which means lots of heavy snow, and thus less visual clarity.
But yes, UE5 games almost universally look like shit and none of them really justify the performance for the visuals on offer.
Anonymous No.723263171
>>723263089
lolno
Anonymous No.723263184 >>723263291 >>723263390
>>723258839
>almost decade old parts
I refuse to believe that
Anonymous No.723263291 >>723263626
>>723263184
Steam collects and published data on the hardware of its user base. It's not a matter of belief.
Anonymous No.723263350
im so fucking sick of third worlders on /v/ complaining whenever a game can't run on their 12 year old laptop. nobody gives a shit that you make $600 a month and can't afford anything else, shut the fuck up holy shit i miss when only the first world had internet access
Anonymous No.723263370
>>723262529
>and i'm referring to the 4k ultra settings now, just so you now, not 1080p high potato mode.

how DARE a game require a current gen midrange card to play at 4k 240fps!!!
Anonymous No.723263390 >>723263456
>>723263184
The theme song of the tranny
Anonymous No.723263404
>>723248016 (OP)
>tfw 2070 Super CHAD playing at 1080p 60FPS
i'm good to go on High, /v/ros. woo! feels good to not have fallen for the 4K jew.
Anonymous No.723263406 >>723263734
>>723263089
Considering everyone in here is crying about the spec requirements of this game I seriously doubt it, there's even some retard in here that thinks resolution size is directly correlated with computation requirements, there's no way that retard works in tech and isn't currently posting from a favela.
Anonymous No.723263456
>>723263390
>SAAR YOU ARE BLOODY TRANNY BASTARD
Why can't you "people" use your own websites instead of shitting up ours?
Anonymous No.723263514
>>723261273
niggas who like having to upgrade their hardware every two years instead of twice a decade.
Anonymous No.723263618 >>723263705
Does this thread prove that poorfag seethers won't be happy until games are made to run on a gt 1030 or gtx 750 or something?
Anonymous No.723263626
>>723263291
>20xx series
>1650
easy to spot 3rd worlders
Anonymous No.723263634
>>723248016 (OP)
These spec reqs honestly aren't awful.
Anonymous No.723263705 >>723263820
>>723263618
Yes. Their needs should be catered.
Anonymous No.723263734
>>723263406
>everyone here
it's a few loud brown people, normal people look at the chart, think "neat looks like it runs fine" and move on with their day.
Anonymous No.723263791 >>723263884 >>723264437
>>723261965
>I want to see actual advancements in games
Games have looked the same or worse since at least 2019, arguably 2014
Anonymous No.723263804 >>723264130
>>723248016 (OP)
1080p 60fps is playable with a 300$ video card.
Sound about the same as always.
Anonymous No.723263820
>>723263705
They were, well over a decade ago when that GPU was relevant
Anonymous No.723263884
>>723263791
Alien Isolation really was a graphical marvel and I rarely ever say that.
Anonymous No.723264130
>>723263804
NOOOO DUDE YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND I GOT TRICKED INTO PLAYING AT 4K 144FPS BY A LINUS TECH TIPS VIDEO OF COUNTER STRIKE GO AND I CAN'T TURN BACK!!! RRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEE!!!
Anonymous No.723264170
>>723249259
Hey, Gollum had issues but it was quite beautiful at times.
Don't have my screenshot folder at hand to prove it but there's some cool vistas here and there.
And that goth elf chick you posted was hot in the first scene you meet her
Anonymous No.723264419 >>723264513 >>723264579
Is this game actually going to be an imm-sim like VTM:B? The devs have only ever made walking sims and a horror game (walking sim variant), so my expectations for the imm-sim gameplay are low.
Anonymous No.723264437
>>723263791
Not to mention, game design has regressed. All that additional power is used for flashy shit while actual game design is left on the wayside anyway, so why care?
To which you'll have to add all that power wasted on allowing people to brute force issues rather having to produce optimized code.
Anonymous No.723264507 >>723264649
>>723248016 (OP)
I mean, I'm poor as all shit and I have no interest in playing this game, but I don't understand why games keep having heavier and heavier requirements while looking worse or the same
When RDR1 came to the PC it initially required way more expensive hardware than RDR2, even though it's ten years older and looks it
I know optimization is something devs don't do anymore because they're all women or brown, but how the fuck cant you at least keep things how they were 10 years ago?
Anonymous No.723264513 >>723264574 >>723265162
>>723264419
An imm-sim is just a walking sim that lets you jump and climb into vents.
Anonymous No.723264574 >>723264590
>>723264513
no shut UP
Anonymous No.723264579
>>723264419
Negro, it's not even an RPG, let a alone and imm-sim
Anonymous No.723264590
>>723264574
SEARCH YOUR FEELINGS
Anonymous No.723264649 >>723264725 >>723265948
>>723264507
>while looking worse or the same
Because you're not keeping up with hardware upgrades. Especially in lighting there's been massive gains since the launch of the current consoles.
Anonymous No.723264717
>>723248016 (OP)
>ULTRA
>dlss
Anonymous No.723264725 >>723264834 >>723265110 >>723265230
>>723264649
>Because you're not keeping up with hardware upgrades
No, I have friend with better PCs, it looks bad on theirs too.
>Especially in lighting there's been massive gains since the launch of the current consoles.
Why no single screenshot or video reflect that?
Anonymous No.723264753
>>723248016 (OP)
I play at 1080p and I always turn off post processing and motion blur so those requirements are surprisingly nice. I guess this 3060 Ti is still never getting replaced.
Anonymous No.723264769
>>723248016 (OP)
You can play the damn game on a potato GTX1060 from like 10 years ago what more do you want?
Anonymous No.723264834 >>723264902
>>723264725
>No, I have friend with better PCs,
>Why no single screenshot or video reflect that?
why are nonwhites so fucking funny
Anonymous No.723264902
>>723264834
Post hand to prove whiteness
Anonymous No.723264913
>>723261273
Folks who aren't poor as shit
Anonymous No.723265016
>>723248128
This.
Anonymous No.723265067 >>723265441
>>723248016 (OP)
>tfw can run it at 4k ultra+ without dlss
feels goodman
Anonymous No.723265110
>>723264725
>I have friend with better PC
What are you a fuckin caveman? Dumbass esl posters can't even type
Anonymous No.723265162
>>723264513
Anonymous No.723265230
>>723264725
idk what to tell you then. Go play sh2 or anything with path tracing if you want the gains to be insanely obvious.
>>723261273
I have a solidly midrange build (13600k + 5070) and play everything at 240fps+, monitor caps out at 300-and-something.
Newer games I'm starting at like 100fps after dlss (if I don't want to play at potato settings) and turning on fg but still, 120/240/etc isn't an exclusively top end experience anymore.
Anonymous No.723265273
>>723248016 (OP)
It's a lot for 2017-looking game.
Anonymous No.723265375 >>723265461 >>723265685
Behold, the only well-written character in the game
Anonymous No.723265441 >>723265619
>>723265067
How can you tell? There's no such option in the graph.
Anonymous No.723265461
>>723265375
Looks worse than control
Anonymous No.723265491
>>723248241
your eyes cant see more than 24fps per second bro, educate yourself
Anonymous No.723265619 >>723265718
>>723265441
because my pc is a lot better than that
Anonymous No.723265685
>>723265375
She owes me sex.
Anonymous No.723265718 >>723265891 >>723266546
>>723265619
That doesn't necessarily mean it can run it at 4k without dlss. Do you not remember stalker 2?
Anonymous No.723265891 >>723265967
>>723265718
i remember running it flawlessly without dlss, yeah
the same way ive had 0 issues with any unreal5 game thats been released
Anonymous No.723265948
>>723264649
>Especially in lighting there's been massive gains since the launch of the current consoles.
Ehh, not really.
Baked lighting was already typically pre-rendered and thus could easily match current raytracing offerings outside of dynamic ToD (unless you used workarounds to emulate a proper ToD), so lighting hasn't really gotten much better.
Reflections have, but even that hasn't been enough to justify the shit performance, especially considering the existence of things like planar reflections and just good old-fashioned rendering the room twice, which is how you end up with shit like the original 360 (and even fucking Wii) version of Dead Rising having proper real-time mirror reflections while the PS5/XSX remake does not.
Anonymous No.723265967
>>723265891
Ok I believe you.
Anonymous No.723266170
DLSS quality is so good at 4K, and the FPS gains are so high, that you can barely tell the difference between it and DLAA. Even if you can run the game at 60+ FPS with just DLAA, youโ€™d still choose DLSS for the massive performance gains.

Itโ€™s really only at 1440p or 1080p where DLSS and FSR4 start to have problems โ€” which is why /v/ is complaining. Same for MFG for everything not multiplayer if you optimized your system to reduce latency already.
Anonymous No.723266321
>โ€”
all you have to know about that poojeet shill
Anonymous No.723266546 >>723267368
>>723265718
>Do you not remember stalker 2?
Anons seem to forget about that game.
In fact, these specs are suspiciously similar to Stalker 2's.
Anonymous No.723267365
>>723248016 (OP)
>30GB
this could be good, or bad
Anonymous No.723267368 >>723267449
>>723266546
...and we had thread upon thread of anons claiming stalker 2 runs like shit on their pc because, y'know, decade old hardware. The simple fact is these games have bloated hardware requirements compared to what people ACTUALLY own.
Anonymous No.723267449
>>723267368
Except Stalker 2 also ran like shit even on actually decent hardware.
So chances are, this will be the same, as is often the case with UE5 games.