Thread 723277838

Why did this earn such contempt?

They'll call him names but they'll never prove him wrong.

Bets on this guy giving up on NFTs and is now shilling for AI?

>>723277838 (OP)
For being a faggot.
>>723277919
Faggot.

>>723277919
the only thing I can call him wrong for is thinking that a 5% drop chance is low

>>723277919
and the time didn't prove him right either

Sentient people knew that all this blockchain gaming faggotry was a scam from the start.

Okay, so, why would a company want to incentivize players to play other games but their own and devote dev time in integrating items from other devs in this process?

Linkedin is just Facebook for grifters instead of boomers. I'm sure both are completely saturated with AI garbage now

>>723278219
Fortnite does something extremely vaguely similar to this, and Fortnite made a quadrillion shekels, therefore it will work for us

>>723278219
Also, how would this require the blockchain and not, say, simply the compatibility work by itself? The blockchain wouldn't enable it, they would still have to add these features by themselves. Why not use, say, Steam Inventory or another similar centralized ledger, which would have faster transactions, less energy costs and a dedicated, already present infrastructure?

>>723277838 (OP)
He didn't need to be held in contempt since he did the whole UV light party that blinded everyone who went there.

>>723277997
That's the great thing with AI, it'll provide you with posts to shill it. Just copy and paste and keep gooning

Because he frames it as the amazing future but it's fucking horrifying and awful in every single way

There are people that think a single mmo profession should take TWO YEARS to level to master and that crafting a single item for one hour is ok. There are unironically people that think that doing this in a game would be fun.

>>723277997
There are people who haven't given up on NFT's yet?

>>723278273
It's the other way around, thoughbeit. Fortnite thinks people will go "Yoooo they got FOTMNIGGERRAPPER on Fornite, bruh this shits fire emoji" and spend billions in microtransactions.

>>723278431
Those are just mobile game mechanics that are over 10 years old at this point

>>723278456
They can either keep going or admit they're suckers left holding the bag. Which one do you think they pick?

One, the math doesn't math. Nobody is going to buy something you get by playing, so it has no monetary value and functions no different from other in game currencies.
Two, companies aren't going to implement things from competitors games that will eat up their customers' attention.
Three, you are never going to balance the economies of multiple games that use the same resource.
Four, game monetization is bad enough as it is. We don't need fucking nfts in games especially when even the biggest proponents can't make a game without cutting and running.

>>723278456
steal the brainrot has basically proven that preteens are ripe for nft exploitation, they just have to wait another 5-10 years for them to grow up

>>723277838 (OP)
The better question is why isn't AI subject to the same contempt

>>723277919
They can just sit back and do nothing for another 4 years 2 months to do it

>>723277838 (OP)
>he has a 5% chance of dropping an Immaculate Orb of Brilliance
>of which there are only 4 in existence
About 20 active players in this crypto game, sounds accurate.

>>723278219
All those hypothetical scamgames are made by the same developer.

>>723278628
AI doesn't cost 10 million dollars to use, at the very least. The ones setting money on fire are the corpos, the users are just being annoyed.

>>723277838 (OP)
>guild
>discord channel
Cancer xp

>>723278628
Because the average person has more than 68IQ and can make more complex judgements than new technology = bad = newer technology

>>723277838 (OP)
two games owned by the same company (EVE and Dust 514) couldn't even make a system a fraction of this complexity work, cointards will never pull it off

>>723278628
It isn't? Everyone that isn't a third worlder can see the implications

>>723278628
Because AI has at least some point. It can answer questions incorrectly, and generate obviously fake videos for Youtube engagement farming, but at least it's DOING something. It's not just a picture you spend hundreds of dollars on and then do nothing with.

>>723278628
You must be living under a rock if you haven't seen people criticize AI

>>723278865
Better yet anon, it will lead to surveillance in a scale never seen before

>so we took a voooote.
>everyone gets... red dhide armors! Even the tanks! Even the mages!
>sorry, we vooooted
>optimal play is replaced by budget consensus because they're assets!!!!

>>723278628
The average consumer will gobble up whatever trash you put in front of them.
Just look at the Disney live actions, the Fortniteification of media, and all the so called brain rot.

lmfao this shit was so fucking funny
by now we were all supposed to be living in vr, buying property in the metaverse, grinding nft and blockchain games, and attending concerts and events in vr
when i think about this from time to time, i laugh myself into a stomach ache.
life is good.

>>723277838 (OP)
You don't need a fucking blockchain for any of this, nevermind the fact no one wants this.

>>723277838 (OP)
It sounds duller than my actual job, and I get paid for that instead of having to pay someone else

>>723278978
>Some thousands of years ago
>Some lordling going "Waaah I don't wanna feel like I am at risk of losing my position to any peasant lets kill them all and only keep the docile peasants"
>This keeps happening constantly until a solid 70% of humanity is dumb, soulless and slop hungry
And the funniest part is that the ones suffering from it are the descendants of those elites who only had beneficial breeding. You are suffering from your ancestors choice.

>>723278881
OP was universally shat on but you can see right here that people (or rather, "people") unironically defend AI

Beneath all the wordswordswords he’s saying with a blockchain you can get items in one game that are usable in another, but that could really only be a thing if they’re made by the same company, and even then there’d be ways to do this without blockchain. Look at Valve, Counter-Strike skins are basically NFTs but not NFTs already.

But even ignoring that this all runs on the assumption that I’m both able and willing to regularly play all of this company’s games. The whole story starts with a match-3 mobile game, something I do not want to play. Am I doing it for the ore? I already spend most of my time doing shit I don’t like in exchange for stuff, that’s how jobs work. I don’t want it in my video game time. The other fake games sound like they’re all MMOs, a genre that even if I liked is famously demanding of people’s time. How about you innovate a way that would give me enough free time to play different three MMOs every day before the blockchain shit?

>>723277838 (OP)
This is what I see whenever an anon talks about gacha or AI games.

>>723278036
I mean if you have to tard wrangle 40 people through a 2-3 hour MMORPG raid for a 5% chance to get a specific item, you'll quickly find it pretty rare too. Not that we have any idea about the specifics because this is all make believe bullshit.

>>723278952
To be clear, I'm not defending AI. The question was why people aren't as critical of it as they were NFTs, and it's because NFTs are completely, totally, and utterly fucking pointless. AI has some point, even if the point itself is bad.

>>723278273
>extremely vaguely similar

>>723279439
What? You don't want a billion fucking dollars?!

>>723277838 (OP)
Nicolas looks like an even more cucked version of Destiny

>>723277919
The owners of such a thing would do everything in their power to make it as tedious and terrible as possible
We're talking shit like adding decay to equipment and durability too
That lovely new set of red dragonhide armor will become worn and cracked within a month of buying it, your shitty obsidian staff will chip and fracture, forcing you to constantly take ten steps back constantly, never truly getting anywhere

>>723278628
aI deEsNT bRiNg AnYtHiNg nEW tO gAmES

>>723279439
Him shoving ever bigger objects up his asshole is extremlynvaguely similar to being in a healthy relationship

>>723277838 (OP)
Because rare items and RMT isn't a new concept

Because what he's describing is basically using real money instead of crypto. If the games operate exclusively on crypto, then yeah, he has a point, but no one would play them because that's stupid. It's like using gold only for buying game currency.

>>723277838 (OP)
the 5% drop rate part is hilarious

>>723279418
One way or another people clearly do find image gen and ChatGPT useful. They aren't willing to pay trillions for it like AI companies are trying to insist to their investors, but there are uses.
NFTs are so completely worthless the developers need to flat out lie in comical and absurd ways to make it sound even remotely useful, like with the "use stuff from games in other games" argument which doesn't even connect with what blockchain does. It was so absurd.

>>723277838 (OP)
>Hey what if playing video games was a job

>buy my blockchain gaming cryptos and make money! crypto gaming is the future!
>okay well what do we do when the crypto goes high? did we innovate crypto gaming?
>no dummy LMAO its time to dump the bags!

>>723278628
Calling it AI at all is such an obviously bullshit thing. AI isn't intelligent. It can't make conclusions. LLMs are just autocomplete on steroids. All they do is replicate patterns, and unfortunately the more people use it, the dumber people get, so we, as a collective society, are spending all of our effort in racing to the bottom as fast as we can, even at the cost of our fucking drinking water, and our "replacement" is dumber than we ever were.

>>723277838 (OP)
Sounds like shit, no thanks.

Because doing ANYTHING with cryptocurrency or the blockchain costs money. Anything. Tard actually thought gamers would say "Dude, I'm totally cool with spending $5 to update my stats after every single encounter and $5 to update my inventory every time I get or sell off items."
This is the biggest problem with using crypto for anything but an investment. It costs just to move it to another account. It costs to buy things with it, it costs to sell it. Using crypto for day to day transactions is just throwing your money away. As a medium for storage and transmission of changeable data, like for a game, it's the worst possible solution.

All I heard was the incessant yapping of the antichrist reading through all of that

>>723278628
I'd rather have ai work on games than pajeets.

>>723277838 (OP)
Why would you need nfts for any of this

>>723279620
True

>>723280589
You can move it around for free if you actually own it.

>>723277838 (OP)
This is retarded on every level.

Why would blockchain need to be involved in linking games together? Why would developers want to desensitize playing their game by pairing progress with other games? In what world does grinding two years to master blacksmithing sound fun? Why would players want their games to be linked across genres that force them to play games that wouldn't appeal to them to progress in games that do? Why has it been so long since this man touched grass that he can't even describe what it looks like in theory?

>5% drop rate is low
>only 4 in existence
This guy never played Ragnarok Online lmao

>>723277997
He's probably doing both. If he hasn't offed himself already for financially destroying his life on these bad bet tech bro scams.

>>723277919
Time itself already proved him wrong long ago. He never stood a chance.

>>723281750
Only 100 people have done that raid must be.

>>723277838 (OP)
Not sure what's funnier... the delusional implication that all games from different companies are going to somehow link to one another without issue, or that half (or more) of the games are going to use a Super Nintendo-like naming scheme and include "Chain" in their names even though it makes no fucking sense

>>723277838 (OP)
>5% drop

That shit would be everywhere across servers after a weekend.

>>723282358
>or that half (or more) of the games are going to use a Super Nintendo-like naming scheme and include "Chain" in their names
Well duh, he's envisioning a better world.

>>723282358
or thinking that 5% drop is rare

>>723277838 (OP)
>WoooW WHAT IF GAMING WAS A FULL TIME JOB!
This is why I hate clueless entrepreneur with rich parents or investor money

so basically nftards want to turn all games into one giant mmo grindfest?

>>723277838 (OP)
if you need why explained to you, get out

>>723277838 (OP)
>creative writing exercise
>>>/lit/

>>723277838 (OP)
>have to play 3 other games just to keep up in one game
>all the games are just various flavors of MMO grindfest, freemium crap your mom plays that constantly wants you to tell 5 friends for bonuses, and cow clickers, all of which already exist
>WoW guild bullshit everywhere
only thing missing is blatant P2W from dying MMOs that have turned to milking the asian market for their life support and you'd have gathered every already-existing cancer in gaming into a grand singularity of shit.