>>723307178 (OP)
>>723309669
we will probably see the filming of women under 21 be illegal in our lives.
we will probably see the federal age of consent raised to 18.
16 was once seen as responsible enough to have sex and make decisions about sex.18 was just a buffer from having the kind of sex that could ruin any potential career for anyone that was desperate as desperate for cash as a highschooler would be.
But truly, I don't blame the irresponsibility of teens the last few generations. If you got "seduced" and knocked up by some 30 year old at 17, back in the day you were in good shape because he had enough bread to take care of you and the kid so it wasn't some life-ruining decision. Nowadays 30 year olds can't take care of themselves and if one knocks up a highschooler they're both fucked. I don't buy the propaganda that it is emotionally traumatizing to fuck with an age gap either based on how many women I know irl that have done so. I wish some of those women would represent online to fight roastie-femcel bullshit, but normalfag women don't get into as many online arguments as the crazies. It's a societal change, but a temporary one. Even if temporary means a century or three. You're right and you can't fight biology. Well you can, you'll just never win. And mores, laws, and norms will always in the end reflect what's good for our biology and even our neurology (lots and lots of physically and emotionally fulfilling sex)