Thread 723371378

Please just make another normal Star Fox game

why won't they deliver on this? Do they really have no one talented enough to make an arcade game?

>>723371378 (OP)
Now that Miyamoto is distracted by the movie biz we have better odds of the next one turning out normal
Assuming of course that Miyamoto didn't ban any Star Fox production while he's busy

>>723371378 (OP)
CAN'T LET YOU DO THAT, STAR FOX

>>723371591
Nintendo making a formulaic sequel is the exception, not the rule. They are happier with tearing up an IP's fundamentals to make room for experimental gimmicks.

>>723371378 (OP)
star fox is dead

>>723371795
I wish they'd get over the art for art's sake hipster bullshit and draw on their well of actual talent

>>723371378 (OP)
you got zero and you didn't like it because you listened to journalists who were too stupid get used to the motion controls. you deserve nothing.

>>723372180
Literally what Nintendo would say after giving us the garbage that was Zero.

>>723372180
I bought it day one and didn't care for it. I should give in another go because I'm developing a fondness for waggle shit in my old age

could they at the very least remaster the 3ds version?

>>723372264
>your allies are completely useless
when has that ever not been the case?

>>723372093
Best doggo

>>723372438
I remember falco tearing up starwolf in 64. I can't even remember how many times I've only killed 1-2 ships

>>723372180
I rented it and can’t say it did anything for me.

>>723372438
In 64, your teammates can open up whole new paths for you
Slippy gives you the fucking boss's health bar
They help you shoot down the missles that are trying to take down the great fox
they destroy search lights.
they help you fight star wolf.
They are crazy important in 64.

>>723372180
Zero was just 64 but with "improved" graphics and shitty controls.
People want 64 but better.

We have the decompiled pc port. Its the best star fox your going to get.

Star fox assault is a 50/50 game. The ship levels are fun...the walking section are just like crack addicts wet dream

Zero was a cheap cash grab
Wasn't 3ds just as bad?

>>723372521
>>723372574
we must have played a different game altogether
then again I don't remember them dying ever when I was playing it, so besides the obvious sectory Y and titania I can't think of areas you get gatekept from if they're dead
still, I wouldn't call them "assets" : they shoot like a laser a minute and their biggest contribution is being bait for starwolf

>>723372093
How is AI so good at making Fay?
Miyu and Krystal always have a few flaws, but Fay comes out damn near perfect every time.

>>723371378 (OP)
Is Star Fox Assault any good if I've only played 64/64 3D?

>>723373153
>I've only played 64/64 3D
as opposed to what, the snes tech demos?

>>723374387
aren't those ones considered good though?

>>723374438
They're neat, especially if your a big fan of the setting, but assault is probably more worth your time. It's fun, man. try it out.

Krystal Ball

>>723373153
Lots of people here suck it off. Frankly, I have no idea why. The levels are linear with not much notable about them, only a handful of bosses are memorable (mainly the "infected" ones). No replayability like SF64 due to the mission structure being so linear, too - a single playthrough will have you see everything the game has to offer. The Arwing doesn't control as well as it does in SF64, and the on-foot sections do the game no favors. And like another anon said, your wingmen are basically useless in Assault (which is not a Krystal exclusive problem, as many will be quick to say). At the very least, the story is interesting though let's be real we already know going in to it that nobody was going to die and it gave us a villain that wasn't Andross for once.
I heard great things about the multiplayer but I have no friends who give enough of a shit about StarFox to play it with me so I can't comment on it.

>>723372838
3ds was just star fox 64 again, like LITERALLY just star fox 64 with different graphics.

>>723374438
first one has an amazing OST
it's also nightmare fuel with the whole fake 3d wireframe shit : extremely uncanny

>>723373053
just is

>>723373153
Is worth one playthrough, same for Adventures and 2.
The original, despite the tech demo status, is a legit good on-rails shooter and has a really good OST.
Dunno if Command ever got a Dpad patch like the Zelda DS games to make it less tedious to play but honestly is a serious downgrade from 64 and Assault, only play it if you're actually curious about it.
Zero is trash.

>>723371378 (OP)
Miyamoto would never allow a fun thing to happen unless it was incredibly innovative even if the innovation got in the way of the fun. He's also the only person who cares about Star Fox so once his stupid ass is gone SF is dead unless Adi Shankar gets the green light from Netflix to make a horrible show that takes place in the Fara Phoenix era but instead features Krystal because internet points.

>>723371591
Go look up the new pokemon im convinced these retards forgot how to make games.

>>723377276
>forgot
They haven't forgotten, they just don't care.
Why put effort into making a good StarFox game when a half-assed Pokemon game will sell literally 50x more?

>>723372967
they slightly change the game. you save falco and he is alive later in the level, you do the fly through the hoop thing then falco leads you to an alternate ending for a different campaign path. it could make a big difference if one was alive or not as it could change how you could play the campaign

>>723377276
>the new pokemon
that isn't developed by nintendo

>>723371378 (OP)
With the Shigs? NO WAY

>>723377276
Pokemon games are another kind of beast. And the TL;DR version is that Pokemon fanbase is legit the only one that no matter how shit are the games is still loyal to the IP, so why bother? The only worse retards are Fifatards

>>723377401
so are we talking lore-wise then? as in they feel like they make a dent during the campaign?
because "unlocking a boss if you keep them alive" feels more like a requirement than the actual crew being instrumental or useful
I played that game like 200 times and it's pretty much the reason why I know english to begin with and I never thought to myself
>luckily falco scratched that one bogey
>thank god bill gave me 2 silver rings while I was roasting on the sun
>amazing, kat destroyed that one searchlight I would have gotten anyway

>>723377613
>the TL;DR version is that Pokemon fanbase is legit the only one that no matter how shit are the games is still loyal to the IP
Not him but in the current year I don't think that's true. For instance I think I'm the only person on Earth who remember when FromSoft made more than 1 game.

>>723371378 (OP)
Unless it's a phone game or a budget title, I dont think we will ever see another Star Fox game again. The market for railshooters is gone, and Zero was a huge flop.

>>723379138
they should reuse donkey kong engine and just make a starfox game with destructible everything

>>723378257
What are you even trying to say? Every zoomer knows about lost kingdoms and fromsoft is a developer, not an IP.

>>723378257
>more than 1 game
Bro your Armored Core?

>>723379441
>fromsoft is a developer, not an IP
Yeah that's why I referred to them making games.
What did you think I meant?

SF's main problem is that there's no dedicated team to make it.
Which team listed here would do a good job with a new SF game? Keep in mind that you'd be sacrificing the team's other games in order to bring SF back, so if you choose Team 5 for instance, say goodbye to Animal Crossing and/or Splatoon.

>>723383125
I'd love to see a StarFox game made by Monolith or Platinum. If nothing else, they'd at least make on-foot sections actually fun.

>>723371378 (OP)
Anon it wouldn't sell.