Thread 723375650

ohnononononono

>>723375650 (OP)
AI generated "texture"

600$ for 60fps ps2 game

>>723375857
Worse, it's hand crafted by G*mefreak

>>723375650 (OP)
I'm not defending tendies but in graphics fag threads there are always plenty of comments saying gfx should have stopped at gen 6. GF listened and you don't like it.

/v/troons still seething.

>>723375985
it's more of an art direction issue

>>723375985
Pretty much

>the current game development model is unsustainable!
>we need smaller games, with lower budgets, and quicker development times
>it doesn't matter about the graphics as long as the game is good!

New Pokemon has great reviews and will sell 20 million copies easily.

>NOOOOOO! NOT LIKE THAT!!!

>>723375985
It's not about graphix but about a fucking lazy job

>>723375650 (OP)
>$110 for a video game
You deserve what you tolerate.

>>723375985
>>723376113
A normal map costs next to nothing computationally.

>>723376259
>I downloaded a zip file it's like I'm the next asmongold guys

>>723376334
Still waiting for you to explain why the map is bad.

>>723375650 (OP)
>>723376003
Worse, it's MIGA

>>723376463
MIGA DE PAN?

>>723376398
Nintendo derangement syndrome, exhibit A

>>723375985
It unironically looks worse than a PS2 game, if the city looked as nice as FF12 Pokémon fans would be having a heart attack over the graphical fidelity

>>723376412
A "normal map" is not "the map," you tech illiterate twat.

>>723376621
>looks worse than a PS2 game

The cope is hysterical lmao but as was expected.

Time to now start seething and shitting about the next Nintendo exclusive coming next month.

>>723376740
Still waiting for you to explain why it's bad.

Hmmm you seem to be struggling with an answer.

>>723376778
it does though, look at it

>>723375985
>gf listened
the fucking 3ds games look better than this, you chainsaw retard

>>723376832
Because it doesn't fucking have one, you retard.

>>723376859
Nah you're seething like fuck because your latest shitpost campaign was a disaster and you got BTFO by reality.

Again.

>>723376778
Yes, it looks worse than ff12. Flat 2d buildings with completely flat 2d textures was a PS1 thing.

>>723376938
Still waiting for you to explain why it's bad.

What's going on with you anon? Why can't you answer?

No Serena. No buy.

>>723375650 (OP)
80$ + TAX + TARIFFS is supposed to be a meme

>>723376938
No sense in responding any more to that fuckwit.

>>723376954
Fuck it looks worse than FFX

>>723375650 (OP)
Nintendo is going full "milk pokecattle" mode aren't they

>>723376954
>it looks worse than ff12.

Mmmmm gorgeous 480p

>>723376946
all I'm doing is looking at the game puzzled how gamefreak has managed to maintain their position with this IP and nintendo hasn't figured out some way to shitcan them. they also render the entire city as a single giant mesh without any chunk streaming, LOD, or culling besides backface and i haven't seen anything that fucking retarded since people found out cities skylines 2 renders the interior of every npc's mouth and eyes at full LOD at all times

>>723376954
nope. even ps1 games were btfoing pokemonin the buildings department with a fraction of the dev time, management, and budget later on, nevermind anything in 2d lmao

>>723376113
>Great reviews
Lmao

>>723377117
>Mmmmm gorgeous 480p
do tendies really, REALLY want to go down this road? holy fuck the lack of self awareness

>>723377090
It looks worse than the majority of the PS2 library. You have to return to the PS1 to find city environments that lifeless and flat.

>>723375650 (OP)
If the graphics are so bad, why exactly can't they use the extra money they have left over to hire the VAs that the Pokemon company is already hiring to do the anime and promo shit?

>>723377217
No kidding

Fuck to be fair Midgar had balconies

>>723377152
It's artistically superior but technologically they are on the same level, the walls and floor are just 2d polygons with a texture slapped on

>>723375650 (OP)
>I love these pokemon games!
>When I grow up I want to make games too!
>Thank you for your application, what videogames development skills do you have?
>I don't know shit about making videogames but I really want to!
>Welcome aboard

>>723376613
>>723376778
I hope you get sued to hell.

>games NEED to be high polygon and high res
grow up

>>723377319
i really wish i could find better screenshots, but fucking dazil alone blows the most flattering screencaps that za has to offer out of the water

>>723376575
MI GAAN

>>723377180
>completely different game.
>now patched

Schizo lmao

>>723377341
This is a level of incompetence that can only be explained by getting a 60+ year old boomer to try and make their first 3d game. Any kid would know how to use normal maps.

>>723377446
I mean yes they should, why would games go backwards?

>>723377446
they at least need good art direction

this game has neither

>>723377602
See >>723376113

>>723377446
They need to look good, it doesn't matter how you achieve it, beautiful games exist within every prior generation. It doesn't look good.

>>723375650 (OP)
30 years from now the ***kiddo shitch will look worse than games from 30 years ago ,LOL

>>723377602
>why would games go backwards

They haven't. Are you seriously suggesting that ZA lools worse than Pokemon on GameBoy.

You are mentally ill and seething lma0o

>>723377446
come on now, anon, we're just asking for pokemon to get back to catch up to the nintendo 64

>>723377602
How would you even define technological advancement in gaming? sure the resolution is higher and the textures are sharper, but i wouldn't call it progress. All devs do today is brute force these 4k games with modern hardware, however I wouldn't say the games are exactly better as a result.
And it's the same with not just games but movies, software, photography and a much more.

>>723378167
i'm so fucking tired that i didn't even proofread my post, hot damn

>>723377486
>>completely different game.
>>now patched
And yet the reviews are still the same.

>>723378240
my brain readed past it and understanded correctly

>>723375985
this looks way worse than many gen 6 games.

>>723378240
it's alright anon we all have esl moments

>>723378450
thank you many kindlies, sir

>>723378214
goofy ahh gpt slop comment

>>723378492
you're a nigger

>>723375650 (OP)
Theres literally nothing wrong with this. Its a kids game. Its made for kids. A kid will not know any difference wether the door is a texture or made up of polygons. You people are completely out of touch.

>>723376613
> so mad he quickly took a screenshot of the tutorial
If thats even your own screenshot which i doubt. Pirates dont play games. Your whole argument proves it.

>>723378407
She's retarded LMFAOO

>>723378536
Using racial slurs is not just offensive—it reflects deep ignorance and perpetuates harm. Language like that has no place in any community, especially on 4chan. If you’re using it casually, I urge you to learn about its history and impact. If you’re using it deliberately, that says more about you than anyone else. I hope you take time to reflect on the weight of your words.

>>723378598
and? kids media used to look like this. should we just abandon fidelity just because you are so out of touch with what kids think that you think that they genuinely cant tell the difference?

>>723378707
so it's okay for you to insult me first>?

>>723378683
You can literally see the steam deck performance overlay that only works on games,puta

>>723377152
Comparing Xenogears graphics/artstyle to Pokemon is like hydrogen bomb vs coughing baby
Pokemon is more like some licensed low effort N64 game

>>723377180
Look at this tertiary who doesnt even know what game we are talking about.

>>723378598
I hope you stub you toe soon

>>723375985
>retards said dumb shit and companies listened while charging premium
>This makes me very clever

you stupit

>>723376259
Based synthcel

>>723378752
retard

>>723378710
that's not a good example. some scenes in prince of egypt are still considered good to this day. I think Iron Giant or Atlantis is a better example of kiddie slop that looked decent.

when did GF realize they could get away with less? gen 3 remakes? x/y?

>>723375650 (OP)
If I'm understanding it correctly, the entire map is just a single model

>>723379191
Yes

>>723379123
thats not the argument you were making. you said "its a kids game they cant tell the difference anyways" i remember being wowed by how amazing prince of egypt looked and we could say the same about games like >>723378458
posted. they looked great back then and still do. this pokemon game just looks like actual shit and children notice this too. its stylistically poor and objectively poor graphically.

>>723379191
are they genuinely retarded? are they making their games badly optimized and ugly on purpose?

>>723378864
Nobody said anything about cleverness or intelligence, you're revealing your own insecurities too much but carry on

>>723379191
>>723379369
Explain why this is bad in gameplay terms.

>>723379191
>>723379369
This is actually good design because you can fly on a Pokemon and get to the other side of the city instantly without any load times.

>>723379628
because its badly optimized and ugly thus making the enjoyment of the game dulled.

>>723379764
you can do the same thing with asset streaming and proper LOD and as a result the game can afford to not look like shit

>>723376621
>he thinks looking 'worse than a PS2 game' is a negative

the only thing that matters in games, is gameplay and sound design, both things the new Pokemon are great at when you play it, I can understand you only play games to look at things but maybe you'd be better off finding a different hobby like going outside

Was changing Pokemon Legends from a anecdotal history adventure sub-franchise from it's first entry, to a decade late Pokemon Z edition in it's second entry really a good idea?

>>723379974
why is enjoying and appreciating aesthetics not welcome in games? do you only play abstract text adventure games and 3d games modded to have no textures or models beyond wireframes?

>>723375985
>Dogshit man
Part 2 really did a number on this series.

>>723375650 (OP)
Graphicsfags deserve the rope.
>>723376113
BASED!

>>723379974
>sound design
I usually play games without music, sometimes completely muted. What is it about sound design that you made it one of the two elements that people should care about?
It's usually rather annoying than anything else, but even when it's done right it's not really important to the game anyway.

>Game is selling well.
>Has good reviews.
>"BUH MUH GRAPHIX!"
Nobody else cares about graphics other than the schizos on /v/;

>>723380245
>he plays games COMPLETELY muted

lmao nothing you say matters, deaf faggot

>>723380056
because that's never been the point of video games, it's always been gameplay and sound design first with other aspects being bonuses on top of the game

>>723380410
I kneel to the depth of your lack of taste.
Say you listen to music on it's own and it will complete the picture.

>>723379628
>explain why it's bad without actually being allowed to talk about what's wrong with it
bruh

>>723379974
Graphics don't matter until they do
When they're so bad it's distracting, it's an issue
The game has the detail and texture work of a phone game from 2017 (said phone game having massively improved since) except it's not free to play, it costs $70

>>723375985
Nigga...
Silent Hill 3.
Halo 2.
Final Fantasy X.
Soul Calibur 2.

Do they look *worse* than this?

>>723379974
Looking like a PS2 game is honestly too nice. It looks like a low budget PS1 game you'd find in a bargain bin for a dollar that plays like shit.

>>723380686
Doesn't matter, these games are celebrated as timeless classics.
Graphics doesn't matter.

>>723379974
it's bad for kinda the same reason why that 2dHD style is horrendous to look at : different sprites have different resolutions which makes the game look jarring
same thing happens here >>723375650 (OP)

>>723380651
and yet, I will never play that free to play game while I will replay this Pokemon game endlessly, why does the price matter?

>>723375985
>no, you see, gamefreak is actually based for putting out PS2 level graphics while charging AAA prices because... uh, a random retard on 4chan said so
the fucking mental gymnastics pokefags have to go through

>>723381064
I pay for a game for the gameplay, not the graphics.
The graphics are completely secondary, even tertiary.

I was watching one of my favourite YouTubers play it for a few minutes and at some points you can see the window frame + part of the pane texture clip straight into the corner of the wall
Amazes me how these games looks WORSE than Gen 6 + 7 outside of resolution and run abysmally too despite being on hardware several magnitudes more powerful

I've never touched a 3D pokemon game, why do they all look like ass in every way
Don't these guys have unlimited money

>>723381352
Not that Anon but the gameplay looks like shit too.

>>723376613
@NINTENDO @FBI

>>723375985
Problem is there are many many gen 6 games that look better and play far better.

>>723375650 (OP)
>$110
no fucking way
is that aussie dollars or something?

>>723377486
>now patched
>still dogshit in every aspect
Lmao

>>723376113
Graphics whores are pissed Pokemon sells 25million and Final Fantasy sells 3 million. Like Pokemon has blown their bullshit out of the water so the graphics whores are now trying to demand Pokemon looks like Final Fantasy.

>>723377486
>patched to reduce the number of characters on the screen so the game doesn't shit itself
Lol, lmao even

>>723382079
There's actually more Pokemon in the patched version of S/V than so think of a better lie next time.

>>723378767
I'm not even that guy but what the fuck does that have to do with his comment? He said you only took a screenshot during the tutorial because you don't actually play games, come back after you've beaten the first boss at least faggot. That's at least a minor clapback.

>>723375985
>>723376113
Because the textures of their buildings tile in a very obvious way, it would actually be rather simple to tile geometry instead. Like, create a simplified balcony consisting of a few planes to shape the railing, and overhang. And then Instance that geometry in a row. The work required would be insignificantly greater than the texture method. It would essentially be like making a 3D tileset.
There is being economical, and then there is being lazy.

Keep in mind, that a lot of older games were actually crafting objects in 3D, baking them into a texture, and then texturing a flat surface. So the steps taken to create the tetxture is pretty much the same steps required to build the actual object.

There already exists many programs that do this. Everyone has already thought of the idea alread. So it's not as if I'm explaining some untested new method of development. It's actually a very common thing. If Pokemon doesn't want to make their own system, they can buy someone else's system.

>>723382126
You're not going to gaslight me xister https://www.thegamer.com/scarlet-violet-patch-lower-pokemon-density-certain-areas/

>>723382373
Aren't the games made in Unity? Is that not a feature included with the engine?

>>723375650 (OP)
that'll be 10 million sales in 3 days

>>723379628
there's a reason those textures look like that

>>723375931
Stop doing that asterisk censor shit. You look like a faggot.

>>723382373
>Because the textures of their buildings tile in a very obvious way, it would actually be rather simple to tile geometry instead. Like, create a simplified balcony consisting of a few planes to shape the railing, and overhang. And then Instance that geometry in a row. The work required would be insignificantly greater than the texture method. It would essentially be like making a 3D tileset.
>There is being economical, and then there is being lazy.

Anon they already had geometry on buildings in SV and it didn't run well on Switch. This is almost certainly a decision for performance.

>>723382604
The Switch should be able to handle it. They must be fucking up in some other way.

>>723382604
It's a decision made because Gamefreak and incompetent when it comes to making 3d games. This is also a switch game https://youtu.be/pEvUt1vYSUk?si=LrU3BzT7gZ0ZMlEa

>>723382474
it is, you can just use any modelling program ever and then import it in unity

>>723376113
Based. /v/trannies are seething so hard right now.

>>723383047
so true xister
all development studios shuould be staffed with unskilled indians

I don't know why you complain, buildings in italy look like this

>>723382373
>not harder than just slapping a texture on a flat surface
also a lot of older games use fixed cameras and static lighting. Texture tricks will only do so much before it either becomes obvious or you spend just as much brainpower and gpu time into faking 3D instead of spending a few polygons on decoration

>>723379191
in no way this is real, right?
they didn't put entire map on 1 single jpeg back in the days.

Christ poketrannies are embarrassing.

>>723375650 (OP)
I would never buy a gamefreak game. On a side note, should I pirate ZA or Legends Arceus? I have been kind of curious about the "new style" of pokemon game.

>>723388618
whatever you do, don't play let's go
it sucks

>>723375985
>Chain-cebollas-man poster is a fucking moron
Wooooah
>>723376259
/thread

>>723375650 (OP)
>”Hey, this emergency exit is painted on!”

>>723389213
kek

>>723375650 (OP)
What am I supposed to look at here?

>>723375650 (OP)
Does that affect gameplay in some way?

>>723389376
The doors
>>723389465
Price does affect it pretty significantly. Doesn't let it have a fair chance if it's priced at that level.

>>723377358
Why is this cuck so angry?

>>723375650 (OP)
Why would they even put a door texture there? A blank wall would have looked better.

So don't buy it?

>>723389465
Let me guess: you need more?

>>723375650 (OP)
Is the game less fun because of this?

>>723375650 (OP)
>110
Cunt, go to target for Nintendo games

>>723375985
>GF listened
I wish they did, the new DQ HD2D games is what Pokemon should be

>>723377180
>71 aka a -1 in journo terms
>low userscore
loooool. lmao even
not to shit on game freak but the backlash stems from the fact that they're basically releasing ds games on a home console, AND they keep cutting features on top of that
still, they dug their own grave when they decided to keep making games bigger and bigger and bigger for 7 gens (gotta catch 'em all, started with the cert you get upon dex completion) and then pulled the plug on the idea with dexcut, sending cataclysmic waves that rippled throughout the fandom and still haven't subsided

>>723376113
>>we need smaller games, with lower budgets, and quicker development times
currently games take forever to produce because they involve hundreds of people who do superfluous movieshit like mocap actors, 3D scans of assets, etc. the scope creep is also massive compared to, say, a ps2 game
games with 10 years of development have also turned out to be shit
>>it doesn't matter about the graphics as long as the game is good!
you misunderstood. the game needs to look GOOD and APPEALING (see stuff like okami), not SUPER REALISTIC dogshit (see monhun wilds)

>>723375985
Ok then why is the game so expensive? Worse graphics should mean cheaper games, right?

I'm pretty sure Quake had more detailed maps

>>723390512
nintendo stopped doing 3 versions of pokemon. instead they tack the third version on afterward as dlc

>>723377486
>now patched
this is still in the game, the game still looks like this

>>723389873
I kind of like it desu.
Give them Pokémon names and you're pretty much done.

>>723379764
>you can fly on a Pokemon and get to the other side of the city instantly without any load times.
you can do that on any open world game

>>723375650 (OP)
why is it so expensive?

>>723375985
the graffixtrannies really didn’t like this post

>>723391961
they are printing money for the migrants

>>723376613
do 'eckies ever play pc games?

>>723391961
Because you'll buy it anyway

>>723375985
Games with lower graphics have no excuse to cut corners everywhere else too unless they're indie. The point is taking the money used on something superfluous like graphics to make the game better but Gamefreak never does that. With the leaks we know that less than 1% of the money they make from their games goes back into the games.

>>723379764
I preffered older pokemon games where the fly animation was unique and cool for every mon and the games graphics were really soulful.
The modern 3D era of pokemon games are really awful. The series has not translated well to 3D.

>>723392658
>I preffered older pokemon games where the fly animation was unique and cool for every mon
that costs a TON of money. it's hundreds of for a 3-second animations no one is going to remember.

>>723391961
you didn't hear it from me ok, but apparingly:
they're laundering money, 20% of what they earn goes to the yakuza, 30% to the government, 45% to a secret organization with the single purpose to genetically engineer catgirls, and the other 5% is split between ninten-ACK

>>723392758
I remembered it. Its why I brought it up.

>>723392758
and why do we focus on if it costs more money? go look how much pokemon is worth and how much they rake it.
I think i understand now. it doesnt matter what they produce and how cheaply it looks, people will still buy it.

>>723392758
Modern Nintendo fans have transformed into such odd creatures where they're obsessed with business and monetization instead of games being good. Is it a result of the Wii U era?

>>723375857
>Sloptendo's against AI, based Sloptendo!
>I love Sloptendo, Sloptendo are the good guys!
Things that happen every other day in here KWABOTY

https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/722466804/#722466804
https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/722451278/#722451278
https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/722446607/#722446607
https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/713131123/#713131123

>>723376113
You only need to buy an overpriced tablet with 2017's tech and spend $150 on the "game".

>>723380756
You guys have really got to stop saying it looks like older consoles, you’ve clearly never played them
It just looks like a cheap unity engine game

>>723392909
>>723392992
wakarimashita gaijin-san. we getto ittu. nexto gamu we wirr cutto anaza haafu ofu arr za poketto monsta to addo customu frighto animeshon. we hopu youa wirr ennujoy ando be satisfiedo

>>723381764
From EBgames most likely yeah
It’s 30 dollars less from other stores, which is about 50 bucks in USD

>>723381352
Then pick up palworld and you'll get the same gameplay at 1/3 the price lmaoooo

>>723393347
it's like rabanastre if rabanastre was entirely made up of flat surfaces

>>723375650 (OP)
>Holy shit 109 bucks!
>Go look at local price
>60 bucks
Must be a canuck

>>723393793
Sorry that was the switch 1 version here's the switch 2.

>>723376096
You don't see the issue of the already much criticized flat texture meant to represent a balcony being placed up against a roof like that

>>723379163
Dude, they are on a console/brand that gets away with hardware from 1-2 generations ago sold like it´s current generation.

>>723375985
gen 6 games looked way better than this. games with smaller budgets and smaller teams.

>>723376113
I'm glad gamefreak can still bother to make games. Lots of studios have forgotten how to ship, it's true

I wish the quality was higher though

>>723394089
huh, they only need to sell ~180k to make back their budget, although with how weak the yen is compared to every other currency its probably more like ~150k

>>723393487
It'll still run like ass sometimes, but has because ue5, not because it's rendering the whole map at all times

>>723375985
Wow I really upset a lot of graphics fags with this post didn't I? It's not my fault yu don'tu know wrat yu wantu ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The Z-A website mentions physical released DLC.
Anyone know where to get this in the US?

>>723379628
No matter where you are, the game is forced to load the full map at any moment because it's just one giant 3D Model, and if you are forced to constantly load the whole world, on a switch, it's going to consume a lot and the game is going to work worse.

>wow this game is slighty better than the previous one that was absolute garbage
>this means this game is GOOD
>Amazing job, Game Freak!
pokefags that apparently only play Pokemon games.

>>723375650 (OP)
I like those graphics, looks like a PSP game upscaled with PPSSPP lol. Pokemon sucks thoughbeit

>>723392658
>I preffered older pokemon games where the fly animation was unique and cool for every mo
There was no such thing. 1 and 2 had a generic bird sprite picking you up. 3 to 5 had a shadow. 6 has a blob. 7 has Charizard and 8 has Corviknight. What the fuck are you talking about?

>and the games graphics were really soulful.
No, they looked like shit.

>>723389873
STOP STEALING FROM INDIE DEVS BASSTRADS

>>723401834
>This is your brain on Pokemon
Maybe the boomers were onto something when they called it satanic...

Need one of these for LegendsZ/A and Time Stranger.

>>723375985
>>723376113
but not for 100$ and 30 fps with dips, you fucking faggots

>>723375650 (OP)
These 3D Pokemon games are the ugliest games I've ever seen.

>>723376613
>30fps
time to get a new handheld

>>723375650 (OP)
>posting Switch 1 footage
Stop lying on the internet.

>>723375650 (OP)
I’m not paying that much for a video game.

>>723375650 (OP)
Game is $85 in that region across multiple retailers

>>723376027
That is true, there's gorgeous looking PS2--and even PS1--games

>>723377486
>>now patched
The patches haven't solved most of the issues SV had, the only patch that somehow fixed the most blatant problems was the switch 2 version.

>>723376113
Nintendo fags have the lowest standards imaginable. And not only that, you retards are so deep in your cult that you don't even realize how low your standards are.

>>723406359
Yeah, all games should have $800,000M budgets and designs like Concord

>>723407363
There are games made by solo devs that look much better

>>723379974
>the only thing that matters in games, is gameplay and sound design
Wrong.

>>723402425
seconded

>>723379974
graphics and sound matter. they need to be appealing, aesthetic, and memorable. sounds should be satisfying and not get irritating with repetition
graphics doesn't mean brown photorealistic vomit, though (e.g. fagdiana jones, faggot stranding 2). fuck that shit with a rake

>>723378598
Toy Story 2 for the PS1 has better graphics than this.

Stop noticing and just consoom

ZABros I don't feel too good

>>723379764
Like how we did in GTA San Andreas?

Mid ass game

>make games with 2005 graphics for 10 million budget that will bring 1+ billion in profit from guaranteed sales
>don't even bother to make them run decently on the proprietary tablet that you lock them into
Holy shit, is there a luckier company than Nintendo? They have herded an entire pen of worshipers, you literally can't lose.

>>723411415
STILL BETTER THAN DIGIMON, BABYYYY

>>723375650 (OP)
kek holy shit

>>723411415
Well looks like the paid reviews are finished, wasn't this shit at an 83

>>723411415
Holy shit it fell so far in just one day

>>723414258
>>723414328
That's Cyber Sleuth, a 10 year old game.

>>723414548
And nothing changed. TS still has the Digimon repeating the same animation for all attacks but the signature.

>>723375985
it looks like shit lmfao you dont need to be a graphics fag to say a game looks like shit these faggots make billions and they make a game look worse than a 1990s game

>>723411415
Digimon Won

>>723411926
>caring about journo (aka paid industry shills) scores at all
>meager difference of 0.1 points when pokemon is at least 10x bigger than digimon
embarrassing

>>723411926
>trusting (((critics)))
I'll wait for the user score, thanks.

>>723379163
Oras was the beginning of the end

>>723417000
don't hold out your breath. it's gonna be botted to hell and back. tons of undeserved 10s and 9s

>>723417000
don't hold your breath. it's gonna be botted to hell and back. tons of undeserved 10s and 9s

>>723376113
>great reviews
Nintendo was smart to send switch 2 versions out instead of the meme base on the first switch. Not to forget 2 meme 100s lmao.

>>723375985
Never heard of your claim, but I feel like we're missing context.

I hope Gamefreak burns in my lifetime but those old husks are actually going to live this out at this rate and be able to cash out in retirement w/o experiencing any consequences for their deep-seated, generational greed.

>>723376113
>it's a good thing when it's christmas and parents buy tons of toys for their kids, that means I'm validated for buying the same toy!

>>723377217
Kingdom Hearts 358/2 days came to mind.

>>723379191
So was hyrule field in ocarina of time

>>723376613
Is nintendo derangement syndrome about the mythical haters made up by tendies? Or are they the ones with the derangement syndrome about their favorite corporation?

>>723401834
if verlis hates it then it must be really good

OH NO NO NO NO NO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AN2syg1EBOU

>>723375650 (OP)
Please understand

>>723417887
I'm not giving you a view, sorry.

>>723417845
It's automatically the GOTY. We can't argue anymore. What were we mad about again?

>>723416491
Both look dumb

>>723416491
POKEFAGS DEFEND THIS

>>723417436
Fucking kek the score dropped so fucking fast, guess those paid reviews finally wrapped up

its over

>>723417958
Charlie says he's not going to play Pokemon because it looks like shit, then he says he loves the new Digimon.

>>723417887
Based Charlie

>>723418170
He's going to make the game fail like he made swsh fail...

>>723375985
to me it's not about the graphics this shit just looks soulless and low-effort like that everywhere
it looks boring and the artstyle of the newer pokemon games sucks

I had hopes this would greatly improve over Arceus, I feel dumb for thinking GF would learn from their mistakes

>>723417680
IT'S NO USE !

LOOK AT THIS BUSH AHAHAHAHA

>>723379191
I'm more baffled with this shit somehow being smaller and less dense than fucking vice city or rockport.

It's just a flat fucking circle without terrain or anything.

>>723417845
Genning is cheating.

>>723376027
This. However, Switch 1 also has open world games with similar graphical fidelity that run much better.

Why is a 2025 modern release utterly mogged by the 1999 N64 Pokemon Stadium?

>>723419713
Those weren't made by Game Freak.

>>723375650 (OP)
>$110
Tariff status?

>>723418346
what's the bottom one, dqm3jp?

Why do they keep making rookie mistakes, how come BotW runs on a normal switch with a fuckhuge map but legends aside from looking worse runs worse too.

>>723375985
So what you're saying the game should cost no more than 20$.

>>723419834
Gamefreak is horrendously managed and incompetent

>>723417887
Everything he said in that video is true

>>723419797
it costs $70 though
its not that bad

>>723419834
Games like Nier Automata, Witcher 3 and Skyrim that weren't even originally made for Switch look better and run better.

>>723418676
Eww

>>723375650 (OP)
A FUCKING LEAF

>>723419797
>>723419979
Day-one DLC.

>>723420303
DLC doesn't release until February 27th retard

>>723417725
...I guess ZA looks a little better than an N64 game

>>723419713
It's really not.

>>723419985
Witcher 3 on switch doesn't look that good

>>723418179
The digimon battle system is way too simplistic to be fun and it operates off that shitty infinite grind system

>>723418179
He's right

>>723418179
He also likes sucking cocks so that's not a great look for you

>>723418676
This is Wii tier slop. What is WRONG with Pokefags?

>>723421504
They're playing the game instead of watching movies

>>723418676
How does this affect the gameplay?

>>723418179
Pokebros.....

>>723375650 (OP)
>Dollarydoos

>>723393487
I already did

>>723378458
Looks much worse, you people are smoking crack.

>>723375985
>ChainSLOP Ma’am

>>723406359
Ah yes from the retard who worships a company that approved well over a dozen fucking DEI Live Service games.

>>723375985
the problem is not the graphics, graphics were never a problem, the problem is the ART that you create with those graphics, this game is artistically bland with no love to it, the world feels like what you'd see in a generic mobile game
there are countless games one could use here, but just as an example, the og final fantasy vii objectivelly has worse graphics, everyone with an eye can see that, and yet it's artistically much better than legends za

>>723420486
But even on base Switch it looks better

>>723375650 (OP)
I'm actually baffled at what you can sale to tendies and get away with.

>>723418224
Lol imagine glazing for fucking youtubers and forming parasocial relations with them

>>723422238
Imagine defending shit like Pokemon

>>723379974
Video games are, for the most part, a visual medium. Unless you're making a pure text adventure like Zork, your game should be visually clear and pleasant to look at. If it isn't, that's a valid criticism to make.
Pokemon is not specifically targeting a retro style, their games look like shit because they don't know any better. And also because their audience is full of people like you who are not only content with it, you actively *want* worse games instead of better ones.

>>723416491
Jesus Christ.......

>>723422293
lol when did i defend pokemon? i just said glazing youtubers is pathetic (which it is)

>>723375650 (OP)
It will sell millions by the way.

>>723382604
>gf is so bad at performance, literally the simplest geometry overwhelms their engine

>>723411926
wtf why is that user score so high

>>723418491
it's actively worse than arceus, they are devolving

>>723422102
>the problem is not the graphics
Yes it. OP is literally bitching at the graphics

>>723422814
You know how people on here call pokemon fans cultists? It's projection, Digimonfags are.

>>723423341
There was no reason to add a balcony if it was going go be flat, there are several other ways to depict windows and they chose one that is known for protuding outside buildings.

>>723423475
Ok graphicsfag.

>>723422592
And Pokemon ganes will continue to be shit

>>723423783
You're like a vegan telling someone meat is gross and bad

>>723375650 (OP)
Who cares? You can't stop people throwing money at this crap so Nintendo have zero incentive to improve the quality.

graffixtroons seething

>>723423725
Although yes it is graphics we are talking about, this is actually an art direction problem, I am not complaining they are using a flat texture, I am pointing out they used a flat texture.

>>723421623
Makes you even more embarrassed as you mash the attack buttons

>>723423978
>Food analogy
In that case Pokemon is the old bologna of meat

nintendo's games are so shit they aren't even worth to dl repacks for.

>>723423978
Nigga what???

>>723375650 (OP)
How do Nintendo cucks even live with themselves?