← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 723533539

13 posts 6 images /v/
Anonymous No.723533539 [Report] >>723534391 >>723534595 >>723535735 >>723535847 >>723535894 >>723535941 >>723535972 >>723536875 >>723537304
Will it be good since it's by the Dragon Quest Builders devs? Or is it gonna fucking suck ass as Pokémon games just suck now?
Anonymous No.723534391 [Report]
>>723533539 (OP)
DQ builders was a joint effort between KT and Squeenix. The director and producer for Builders left Squeenix back in like 2019? and I don't know what they're doing at the moment.

So it's not the same team behind builders. It might be better and worse than the builders games, likely worse considering pokemon games have no budget and are kept simple/dumbed down to remain palatable to all age groups even more so than DQ games are.
Anonymous No.723534595 [Report]
>>723533539 (OP)
I like seeing the viva pinata gameplay mechanic of building the ecosystem to have different pokemon's arrive.
Anonymous No.723534939 [Report]
Might be decent to good depending how much they take from DQ Builders game. Won't take much to be better than the recent Pokemon games.
Anonymous No.723535735 [Report] >>723535972 >>723536215
>>723533539 (OP)
pokemon games suck due to gamefreak.
pokken, snap2, etc have all been fine to great to my knowledge. but those weren't devved by gamefreak.
that studio needs to be killed off.
Anonymous No.723535847 [Report]
>>723533539 (OP)
Fire all the Gamefreak boomers, and hire chud fans into troops) as consultants, then Pokemon will become good
Anonymous No.723535894 [Report]
>>723533539 (OP)
Fire all the Gamefreak boomers, and hire chud fans (no troons) as consultants, then Pokemon will become good
Anonymous No.723535941 [Report] >>723536215 >>723536806
>>723533539 (OP)
Likely the latter. Palfarm looks more interesting anyways.
Anonymous No.723535972 [Report]
>>723533539 (OP)
This >>723535735
Most spinoff games are actually pretty decent. GameFreak actually drags the franchise down with their incompetence.
Anonymous No.723536215 [Report]
>>723535735
Yeah I dont know how this is even a question. There isnt anything about pokemon that makes the games inherently bad, thats a retarded perception. Like you say, what was wrong with detective pikachu, pokken tournament, mystery dungeon, etc? Absolutely nothing.

>>723535941
>paltranny literally cant go one thread without getting triggered by pokemon
We need IDs on /v/, Im curious if there are a handful of you, or its just one especially buckbroken sped.
Anonymous No.723536806 [Report]
>>723535941
This
Anonymous No.723536875 [Report]
>>723533539 (OP)
It's a non-mobile Pokemon game that isn't made by GameFreak, so it's bound to be enjoyable if you're a Pokemon fan.
Don't expect anything too hardcore or involved, but if you want something cute and chill, then it'll do the trick for you, hopefully.
Anonymous No.723537304 [Report]
>>723533539 (OP)
Umm... Take a wild guess?