Thread 723574025

I wish this was a better game. I was intending to buy it ever since I got a Switch 2, and then I saw the gameplay.

>>723574025 (OP)
I was like this but with legends arceus, i still remember how hyped i was at first
>OMFG Breath of the Wild but Pokemon!, FUCKING FINALLY!!!
then i saw the gameplay and how bad the game looked, i didn't buy it of course.

I was not expecting anything of ZA after Arceus and S/V, i was right

>>723574025 (OP)
Nin10do has become a meme. You should nt have bought that Switch 2.
Anyways, enjoy the joycon drift. And the physical button that is locked behind an online subscription. And the casualized goyslop games. And the fact that the console is easy to break. And the 80 dollars price tag. And the "game key cards" with nothing on them. And (etc or 5 minutes)

>>723574025 (OP)
I have a switch 2 and also wanted to buy it but it looks like slop especially for 70 dollars. I only have mario kart world. no games console

>>723574025 (OP)
Maybe next time they will give it a budget bigger than an indie game.

>>723574025 (OP)
You don't have a Switch 2 and you never intended to buy this game.

>>723577031
get Bananza.

>>723574025 (OP)
Personally, I'm hoping nothing too tempting comes out before the OLED model refresh... or at least some sort of news that the production plants have swapped to a better LCD screen than the ones in the batches so far.

>>723577191
You mean the game that came and was immediately forgotten after a few weeks? The one that got DLC shoved in our faces not even a month later? The same game that got a demo cause no one was buying it? That Bananza?
I’ll pass

>>723577191
it costs too much. Looks like I will buy nothing until the switch 2 gets hacked and pirate everything

Series was dead with XY. If you read the interviews on why they designed all subsequent games that way you'll understand they're aiming for the absolute bottom of the barrel when it comes to both the game's quality and its target audience.

It's kind of funny reading tourists not understanding why these wild monsters attack other pokeman and humans. It's like they watched a 4dubs fanfiction and didn't realize the monsters were always, you know, feral and attacking and killing other people and monsters.

>>723579572
what i don't understand, why the city allows rogue animals that attack people to stay in the city if they know if they're a liability it's like combining the rain forest with new york and expecting it to not go horribly wrong

>>723579890
From what I see there is a fair amount of ambient dialogue along the lines of
>what is this
>what are we doing
>this is going to not end well

>>723580213
so pokemon co didn't think far ahead in consistency of why they added feral animals that chase and attack the player they could've added a pokemon catcher defense force or a pokemon version of an animal catcher to make it seem more natural

>>723580706
That's not what anon was saying at all, they were talking about the mollified audience that acts like it's a big deal if that content that has been in the franchise in the beginning is somehow shocking. Because they see it as "kids media" Again going back to the reality that pokemon kill and eat other pokemon. Or probably kill hapless human travelers more often than not.

>>723581308
oh mb i thought he was talking about the npc's dialogue in the new game my brain focused on dialogue and thought he was talking about the npc's but he is kind of wrong because this isn't really shocking it's a natural thing that happens in nature and that kind of tame even if pokemon shows "Friendly colorful creatures" attacking random citizens it's not as shocking if a Monster tamer show shows a disease like wasting diseases in their show that you can actually see the creature deteriorate and for the people he's probably talking they probably never seen how cruel nature is

>>723574025 (OP)
tvth