>>723631604
For me it's "boys' club rhetoric." Complete dead-eyed refusal to believe that people like these things for their own sake. Yeah mate, rhetoric mate. A hoary bit of Rhetoric.. which serves a Purpose.
>>723632306
Those are fake accounts made to appeal to (You) to get (You) to come back to their Website so the website gets more Bumps. It was super effective when they first started doing it
>>723635148
Yes, with a preference! Also, D might make the best mom to diffuse any situation her hypothetical son would get in, like her son getting picked on by a bully for example. Messing with D would be a bad idea
>>723635496
She would probably take the time out of her busy day to meet up with the bully, and have a thoughtful conversation about why bullying is bad no doubt. And since this kind of topics are hard to get across, sometimes she would be late to return home for dinner
>>723635707
Absolutely, some young men these days are much more audacious and uncontrollable. It's understandable to see that conversation lasting until midnight perhaps and she may come home sweating and with dishevelled hair. This also probably means there's no dinner prepared for the son, sad but it can't be helped.
>>723635895 >>723635967
I do think it's pretty lame how male bisexuals keep trying to divert threads into fetishes for which some amount of same-sex attraction is necessary (cuckolding, group-gooner stuff). And obviously part of why they feel justified in doing this is that they can't tell these things do involve attraction to men in some important sense. "We've all felt this way, right?"
