>>723637459
Because regardless of being a good thing or not, its pretty disgusting that a GAME wants to tell you how to use your PC to such a degree as forcing certain BIOS options. Not about being a good or bad thing, but about something a GAME should not have a saying in to be playable.
In fairness, the problems a lot of people are having aren’t related to secure boot itself, but rather the need to disable CSM before secure boot can be enabled. They’d likely run in to similar problems if they wanted to enable Resizable BAR, which also requires CSM be disabled.
Anticheat that uses SB also simoly doesn't work as intended, as there are already cheats for bf6, that don't run at the kernel level (which has been the case since fucking like '07. No well known cheating service has had to use kernel level permissions to remain undetected since cs source)
Secure boot scheme when ideally implemented is a good thing. By that I mean Microsoft is not the root trusted certificate authority. But they are. The user isn't, or at least the user keys aren't.
By design it allows Microsoft to make any sort of deal if asked by a government or entity to put things in your bios that you cannot bypass.
Now when it comes to gaming it gets even worse. They're using software which is essentially using x-ray for better lack of words, to scan everything in your running computer whether you're playing the game or not. That usually is a behavior of a rootkit or trojan, virus you can use your imagination.
So in my view it's a misimplemented good idea now badly used for the wrong reasons.
