>>723679654
>Jak 1 isn't even that great of a game. Boring mini games, platforming that only gets good near the end. I've accepted I'm just surrounded by retards.
I have no idea why you say this, as if Jak 2 didnt make the minigames arguably even worse. Or as if Jak 2 significantly improved on the platforming, when theres arguably less of it because it has to share time with the numerous other amount of filler gameplay added and the increased focus on combat.
Or how much time is wasted going from mission to mission for how short they are or how quickly they add new ideas just to abandon it.
Seriously. All of this and I didnt even have to mention GTA once.
Tell me why I should think the game is good despite this? I have no biases. I have no narratives. I can both say that Jak 1 and 2 were flawed undercooked games that never really developed as the games went on. EVEN within their own game.
I wanted to believe they were different or special in some way because how rare adventure platformers were and how much I think games like Ratchet and Clank shit the bed moving off from platforming and adventure to a more action and action and oh, jump while you action; gameplay.
