Thread 723704414

>we want your choices to affect the world
So in other words you want to waste fuckloads of time and money on something that doesn't change the gameplay experience? Even knowing that everyone will just watch a 15 minute compilation of all the "differences"(two extra npc voicelines) on youtube instead of playing the game more than once?

No, this is not what a roleplaying game is, notTodd. In an rpg, you're only supposed to know who (you) are and you're only supposed to decide what (you) do in each situation. You don't change the story of the world, the world is supposed to change yours. Todd Howard understood that when he made Fallout 3. In that game you couldn't just decide what your story was going to be before you started. I remember having to change my character's build based on circumstances for survival purposes, and having to change what I thought my morals were based on story shit.

retarded take

they going to turn sword singing to bound weapon

>>723704414 (OP)
everything todd says is a lie to fund his moto jacket obsession

>>723704414 (OP)
>Todd Howard understood that when he made Fallout 3.
No he didn't. He didn't even understand something as simplistic as what the retro-futurism revival was and why every single thing would not be in that style. The reason Fallout 3 even approached the "The world changes you," stuff you are talking about is because it was long standing convention, and that is all Todd Howard can think in, tropes and conventions. And even then FO3 wasn't like that, the player has to solve so many problems that otherwise exist in stasis until the player arrives with characters who do nothing but wait for the player to affect change upon the world.

>>723705629
I would ask you what you meant by everything you said but you're a crybaby so you don't have a point you're just typing random nonsense sentences.

>>723704414 (OP)
what about a nemesis system like in shadow of mordor/war?