Game creation still needs a designer to make it fun.
AI code will not be well made so someone will need to fix what it does wrong
AI art is a repellant to players who see it as a lazily made product
Unless youre literally ripping off an existing game, you're not going to make anything. And the only people who think that could happen have a vested interest in you buying into the slop before the bubble pops.
we could have machines that perfectly read the mind of any indian you put in it, to interpret it perfectly and turn it legible, and after all that turn those games code, 3d models and a game, and no indian will ever manage to make a good videogame
>>723727568
The appeal isn't playing games made with AI. The appeal is the idea that you could make your own custom game with AI with minimal effort. It's like the Mario Maker or Dreams appeal, but much broader. The people making the AI games aren't going to profit. It's the people selling the AI game generators packaged as an easy to use toy who are going to profit. It's what we already see with AI content. Nobody wants to actually buy the AI content and nobody cares about other people's AI slop. We just want to play with the AI slop generator ourselves.
>>723728047
I made some rock/funk operas I like to listen to sometimes while driving, I have NEVER listened to a full 10 seconds of anyone's else AI slop, I might, but what I asked it to generate was so specific to what I wanted