Thread 723775158

Only 4% of gamers actively buy new video games.

have you seen the absolute state of the economy? grocery prices? unemployment and wage stagnation? maybe it has to do with that?

>>723775158 (OP)
Ban bsky threads. V is an X board.

>>723775224
We're also in the midst of a global war, and several civil wars. Why would people be buying games in such an environment?

>>723775224
>>723775434
Let us no forget, most current shit is trash, it's also no surprise.
I would think people wait for sales.

>>723775158 (OP)
zoomers are buying skins out their asses

>>723775224
>>723775434
everyone playing f2p chinese gacha now chud, have you seen how many they make each month?

>>723775158 (OP)
>hyper-enthusiast, price-insensitive
jesus christ what a fucking slimy way to say "a spendthrift with no standards"
i wonder if this creature even still has a soul or if he replaced all of it with corporate mottos

>>723775158 (OP)
if he means new like just released i almost never do that

>>723775158 (OP)
More than once a month is more than I buy. I usually do one a month and then pirate anything else

>>723775158 (OP)
making games cost $100 will fix this

I spend around $200 every other week on games, but I'm going to used media thrift stores and buying old games, and consoles. I do occasionally buy games developed by modern developer. Owlcat for example, I buy every game they release.

>>723775158 (OP)
>only 4% of gamers buy games more than once a month
If you only buy AAA games that's completely reasonable

>>723775224
Are you a Euro or a Canuck?

>>723775158 (OP)
According to your image, about 66% of gamers buy new video games. Only 4% of them buy MORE THAN ONE new game PER MONTH.

>>723775986
Probably a burger american

>>723775996
And this is counting people who play exclusively mobile dogshit as 'video game players' as well.

>>723776070
That's dumb. Mobile gamers exclusively play f2p games.

>>723775158 (OP)
>Hyper enthusiast, price-insensitive players
Read: tasteless.

>>723776052
>American
I doubt it, only losers complain about prices or jobs here. Since getting an entry level position is as easy as just walking up to a manager and even fast food employees make like $20 an hour starting pay nowadays.

>>723775224
this may sound strange, but stuff like video games and pocky actually sell BETTER during a time of financial crisis. Reminder that the last vidya BOOM was during the housing crisis disaster

>>723775869
how do you not own everything worth owning after a few months?

>>723775583
>made up AI numbers

>>723775158 (OP)
>Only 4%
DAS RITE

>have a life
>games I want suddenly have 70% discounts because i actually do other shit than playing vidya, and when not im playing older vidya since it was better anyway.

>>723775158 (OP)
>more than once a month
Once a month is pretty active, anon.

>>723775224
>how can you be playing video games when there's a genocide going on??

>>723776293
people want their escapism from reality
problem is modern games just tries to shove more reality into you

>>723775158 (OP)
>Games suck more today than they did back then
>Most are buying older games, sticking to very few AAA's
>Indies barely exist because there is not enough high quality ones so the market is flat.
This is why we do not have much more than 5% buying anything.

>>723775158 (OP)
Because new games are absolute dog shit.

>>723775224
>dude everyone's poor because I am
This has been debunked time and time again.
The Switch 2 literally broke sales records.
Everyone is buying the new iPhone.
Despite games being $70, they're still selling,
The economy is fine, stop ordering delivery and you can afford groceries too.

>>723778450
Credit card debt is also the highest it's ever been but ignore that

>>723775158 (OP)
>according to [closed study]
This data is always skewed. I've bought several new games this year, I don't remember being asked about that study.

>>723775158 (OP)
and what % of these people are "video game players" vs people who actually play video games.
how can you include people who only play mobile games and just play f2p stuff when you are trying to make a buy to play PC game. these people don't even have PC, they are not apart of your target market, you need to look at people in your market and their trends, the size of the market is important as well and including people who are not actually in your market just inflates the size of it and you get incorrect data.

>>723776260
>Since getting an entry level position is as easy as just walking up to a manager and even fast food employees make like $20 an hour starting pay nowadays.
I lost my salary job a while back because my company closed our location and I'm now I'm making minimum wage in my state which is significantly below $20/hr...

The U.S. economy is a giant scam. Americans in the top 10% income bracket made up 49.2% of total consumer spending during Q2 of 2025. And Nvidia is worth more than the entire pharmaceutical industry. Our economy is going to implode before long.

>>723775158 (OP)
>outright claiming you are targeting maximum suckers
yea we know

>>723775158 (OP)
That 4% is hardcore gamers, and 10% still buy a game every month which isn't that bad all things considered

When you facto in the 22% that still buys several games a year it's 1/3 of gamers that consistently buy new games

We also don't know what they count as overall game players, does your mom playing candy crush count? If yes, it makes that number look worse

>>723776260
Do boomers really believe this?

>>723775158 (OP)
nortubel could save the industry

>>723775158 (OP)
>don't play the 600 games in your backlog, just consume game and get excited for more game

>>723778450
it's just amerimutts
they can't afford groceries and dental care but will go in debt over a console lmao
truly the 56% master race

>train people to wait for sales
>wonder why people aren't buying games on release

>>723775158 (OP)
>Includes Mobile "Gamers"
IRRELEVANT

>>723775158 (OP)
>according to this data which i won't show you i will tell you things based upon it
uh huh
this shit was a scam when it was called npd too.

>>723779465
only a retard would pay 70 washingtons or whatever the current amount is for a game

Of course. Entire countries are pyramid schemes propped up by pension funds and the stockmarket.

>>723775158 (OP)
>bell curve with a tilt if you ignore never-buy f2p fags
Is this supposed to be surprising?

>>723775158 (OP)
>>723775996
True. It's proven that OP sucks cocks yet again and so does Mat Pisscat.

>>723778490
That's what that asshole is being disingenuous about everyone is living off of credit cards now because they know they are in a collapsing empire real time

>>723775158 (OP)
That’s 36%, and nobody asked me, so who did they ask?

>>723775158 (OP)
Muh economy my ass, games are just shit.

>>723775158 (OP)
Kids all play Roblox and Fortnite
90% of adults only play CoD and sports games
the last 10% knows better than to spend money on the trash that's getting released.

>release bugy mess of a remaster of a remaster infected with woke/revisionism
>game play like shit and suffer from massive performance "just buy a fucking 2K$ gpu lol" say the dev
>priced at 70$ or more and never go down in price
yeah dude, I don't know why one third doesn't buy new games anymore, it's a mystery really

>>723775158 (OP)
what is the definition of "new videogame". is the report saying "new" as in new to the player (as opposed to something like a subscription fee or DLC or other microtransaction bullshit) or "new" as in was recently released? if the latter, how recent constitutes as "new"? i have spent around 400 dollars on games this year, and only captain blood released this year. of the releases from this year that interest me, none are worth spending the asking price when i already have a backlog and can wait for sales to buy games for 5-10 dollars each. i want to play ninja gaiden 4 but i will wait for a sale. i want to play MGS delta, but i will wait for a sale. it just is not worth it to pay full price to try to not get FOMO. last year i bought slitterhead and DD2 on launch. before that i hadn't bought a title on launch since NEO TWEWY. i almost bought death stranding 2 this year, but i didn't want to cough up the dosh for a ps5.

>>723780151
>never go down in price
This is only Nintendo.

>>723775158 (OP)
The digital videogame ecosystem the console manufacturers wanted last gen to trap players on their consoles is fully matured and everyone has large enough libraries to buy games on their own schedules. We're not trading old games in to buy new titles and we're buying so fast on sales we've got games we own but never even touched. On top of the lack of a need to get anything at launch, games are so shit the desire is weak. People buy multiplayer games at launch so they get the community, that's it.

I pirate everything and I'd say that I delete around 80% of new games after a few hours, they're unplayable slop. No wonder normies don't buy that shit.

>>723776293
Except there are other forms of entertainment people throw their money at now. Vtubers blew up largely due to Covid.

>>723780226
no, lots of publishers rarely reduce prices anymore. and if they do, it isn't by much. long gone are the days of a year old game being sold for a fraction of the launch price.

>>723780226
yes and no actually, yes for the entire product lifetime, no in regard of an entire year (knowing that some games can stay 2 to 3 years without a single price down on some marketplace)

If you wanted to buy Dark Souls 3 right now on steam (no cdkey, actual steam), you would need to pay 60€, unless you are lucky to wait for the 30€ price drop "sales".
We are talking about a game released in fucking 2016, almost 10 years ago.

>lower quality overall but higher prices
>wtf why no one buy the vidya

>capitalists panicking when the free market starts free marketing and they stop making money
lmao

>>723780396
>>723780425
Oh, you're talking about permanent reductions, not sales? My bad.

>>723780471
They need a gov bailout

>>723775158 (OP)
Is there even a new AA or AAA game that releases each month? Indie games go on sale for 50% off weeks after they release or get bundled so theres no reason to buy them on release

I'm surprised 14% of gamers buy a new game a month or more.

There aren't enough good games coming out for that so what the fuck are these people buying?

>>723780497
the pure capitalist act of begging daddy government for money

>>723775158 (OP)
>hyper enthusiast, price insensitive
Translation: "Loaded with credit card debt."

new games bad and expensive
old games good and cheap

>Denuvo
>Kernel AntiCheat
>Physical game still requires day one download update because they ship it unfinished and unpolished
>DLC/Microtransactions out the ass
>Remake, Remaster, Ports
>$70
>woke deislop
>The absolute fucking stupid hoops Nintendo wants people to jump through to lend games now

I'm just tired of it. Majority of devs will do anything to get your money except make a good game. I bought E33 and I bought Silksong and I will buy Octopath Traveler 0. That's all I am buying in 2025.

Tail as old as thyme.

>>723780582
>I bought E33 and I bought Silksong and I will buy Octopath Traveler 0.
Almost the exact same for me but change octo to rainworld

Buy on release:
>buggy
>incomplete
>denuvo
>$90

Buy 2 years later:
>bismuth edition on gog - $15

>>723780531
There are plenty, Battlefield 6 is this month, Silent Hill f was last month. It's rare there isn't at least one big AAA or AA game each month. They might not always be in a genre you want though.

>>723780474
yes, which is the big problem with those "sales", they literally replaced the actual "price down" that you were getting back then, aka, the game get cheaper and cheaper over time.
Now, the game keep the same price the whole life, and you need to "rush" on those sales if you want to buy it at a "lower" price, which is stupid, because now that said game is in competition with other games on "sales" and games that just get released.

>>723780687
>rainworld
an 8 year old game?

>>723775158 (OP)
Oh boy, let me buy the $80 slop + Season Pass + Deluxe Shit + In-Game Shop + Taxes + Tip, featuring a screaming ugly woman and Debra Wilson. Made by people who hate you and would celebrate your death. After downloading the 320 GB game, you find out it won’t be playable for the next six months because it’s a buggy mess. You have to download daily patches that are bigger than the entire PS1 library.

>>723780425
DaS3 had better sales than half off at 30 before Elden Ring released. From changed their sales strategy after that, they're not a great example of what every publisher is doing.

>>723780604
>1996
just one year before the boom of the PSX and all those great new and innovative game, so not really comparable to what we got today with muh RTX and AI kek

I only buy games from European studios from now on. And only when they have reasonable business practices like no DLC and a complete package.

Expedition 33 is the only game I bought this year.

>>723780872
>they're not a great example of what every publisher is doing
I know, there is worst than them, I was taking this example since it's something anybody can check for themselves easily on steam.

The only two titles I've bought on release this year were Silksong and Fantasy Maiden Wars

The most recent games I bought was sons of the forest and look outside, my brain auto filters all the samey unreal slop

>>723775158 (OP)
I buy plenty of games. It's just pretty rare for them to be from the year I'm purchasing them in. The only three 2025 releases I've bought were Expedition 33, Stellar Blade and Dolls Nest.

>>723780837
what a time to be alive!

>>723775158 (OP)
I have a chart that shows all the games I acquired this year. i am the 1%

>>723780474
even sales are lackluster these days. look at MGSV. at launch? 60 bucks. it took less than a year for it to go to 40 bucks. then, in april 2017 it hit 20 bucks. in two years it went down in price by 66% with sales happening to it every couple months. it frequently went on sale since then, hitting 5 dollars often. now? hasn't had a sale since 2021 and remained at 20 bucks. this is pretty standard across publishers, lots of them have just stopped trying to sell their catalogues.

Ive spent more on Hgames than gamegames in recent years.

Vidya as a hobby is actually very cheap. Try doing mostly anything else and the costs will ramp up quickly.

>>723775158 (OP)
we need more GAAS
why is no one buying new games on a daily basis

????

>>723781136
vidya as a hobby is a lot harder to monetize and a whole lot less social than other hobbies, though. it may be cheaper overall, but the cost involved is becoming a decrepit creep with no valuable skills.

>>723780786
two games releasing in the season that the biggest releases have released in isnt much of an argument. I would also argue that, today, silent hill isnt seen as a AAA or big name franchise in the west.

>>723780813
You said buy in 2025, not released in 2025

>>723782052
Go down a list of releases and there's non indie releases every month. Silent Hill f is AA as it's from a Taiwanese b studio.

>>723775224
I make 130k/year and tbqh I'm in the "less than once a year" category, I mostly just play older games, because they're better. Game quality peaked around 1998-2008, that was the golden age and it's been downhill since then. I will, VERY rarely, like maybe once every few years, buy a new game if I see something that catches my interest and looks like it'll be good.

>>723782412
I agree, but my argument is that the average player (Playstation/Switch owner) is buying 2-3 AAA games a year and maybe 1 or 2 other games a year. I dont think Steam users are different in total buys. So releases arent important

I’ve bought two games this year (Silksong and NG4) and my thinking has been “damn, eating good in 2025”.

Release better games and I’ll buy more of them.

>>723775158 (OP)
>new video games
new vidya arent worth jack

>>723775369
>V
trannie

>>723775158 (OP)
It has always been like this tho. Average attache rate always has been sub 10 games and only consoles for the core (sega at the time) had huge game sales.

The average consumer always bought about 2 games a year
>but muh state of the world
No impact. Nintendo keeps selling record numbers, so if money was the issue, the 450 dollar machine wouldnt be bought on mass

>>723782205
Fair enough

>>723775158 (OP)
Once a month is already a lot for many. Games are pricey in today's climate as others have said, but time also factors in. I bet most people railing against every new release here on /v/ are faggots who play nothing but games that drain their day with digital labour. Muh gacha genshin dailies. Fuck those.

>>723775158 (OP)
I'm glad only 4% of gamers are that dumb with these shitty games we're getting now

>>723775158 (OP)
I've bought some indie games at full price this year.
I don't think I've purchased a single AAA game at full price in the past decade.

>>723784430
It's a complete you issue if you can't find new releases that spark interest in you. It has never been easier to find good games. But I bet you are a massive retard who's just flinging and eating shit here. Fucking disgusting.

>>723775224
People used to be able to buy games back in 2008-2009 and that was a rough time. Shit must've been extra fucked this time.

I can confirm that I haven't paid full price since elden ring. I don't know why I'm this stingy with games. I regularly throw away 4 euros for a pint that I finish in 20 minutes yet right now I'm doing an entire research to see if Sherlock Holmes The Awakened is worth the 5 euros. what's up with that?

>>723775158 (OP)
I sometimes buy game, but only when they are aorund 10-15 euro, and I'm really interested

>>723785623
Everyone has a massive backlog. Unless you really want a new title, and you absolutely want to play it immediately, experience it with people or alike, you can simply wait for a steep discount.

>>723785623
With a pint you know exactly what you're going to get. A game is a lottery, and there's a time investment as well, gotta learn the new UI and quirks and there's a decent chance it's just straight up broken or horrible grind or a clone of an older game but less fun.

>>723775158 (OP)
I've never heard of this survey so I must assume no one else has either and their data is faulty

>>723775158 (OP)
I buy games like once or twice a week kek

>>723780394
no normal person watches vtubers

>>723775224
It's not that bad yet
People having issues being financially independent/wealthy is very common, they call it the American "dream" because it's something you chase, not something that's given.
We might get into a recession if the trade war gets bad enough, or if the AI bubble actually pops or takes significant jobs out of the economy, but if you participated in the market during the last 6 years you probably made out like a bandit at this point

>>723786320
call of fortnite: battlefield legends skins dont count

>>723786483
>if the AI bubble actually pops
Please God let this happen it would be so funny.

Last expensive full game I bought was D2 final shape + annual pass
final shape was good but fuck me the rest of that shit was a waste of money, before that was payday 3 and another waste of fucking money and they refused to refund me which was bullshit
I probably buy maybe 1 game every year these days, most games just suck total balls what's the fucking point?

>>723786487
No I mean real games
Mainly indie or games on big discounts

>>723786532
It'd absolutely buttfuck the market, so depending on your position you might not want that
Probably is for the greater good in the long term

95% of games i bought in the last 10 years have been at least 3+ years old. Each and every single one of them i have purchased in a sale with at least 80% off.

>>723775224
they should keep importing millions of jeets and nigs who have no interest in videogames and who will drastically lower the living standards of the entire developed world

>>723775158 (OP)
new games are for suckers

>>723786483
most muttmericans are piss broke, just delusional enough to cope themselves into an "it's fine" mode until they can't anymore

>>723786805
cope

>>723786805
That is the status quo
It's never not been that way, doomer. Acquiring wealth if you're not born in it takes time and/or good decisions

I already have like 800 games, I've really slowed down just randomly buying shit off my wishlist

>>723775520
Ah yes because people only buy quality

>>723775158 (OP)
Thanks but I'm sticking with Civ 4

>>723775158 (OP)
Seems like only 25% of gamers are actually gamers

>>723775158 (OP)
Why the fuck do I need more games if my golden backlog is rotting away while my playgroup is stacking more and more coop titles that are waiting for completion?

If a new game is not something like Silksong, right into the backlog it goes, I will buy it after it fixed, optimised and balanced for half price two years later. Especially if it is an AAA-wannabe, because these tend to be the most broken and mid shit at the start and MAYBE good later.

No, really, gaming is my main hobby, and I have money for games, but it is just the most efficient way to approach it after many tries and errors. In 9 times of 10 hype and fear of missing out are nothing, marketer-kun can suck it.

>>723775158 (OP)
Games are too expensive when they're new because after about 5 months they'll suddenly be worth half of even less or end up on gamepass of all things
Just isn't worth getting burned on what a majority of the population views as mid

>>723775158 (OP)
At this point there's an absolute shitload of games. Many of them are free or free to get. Honestly it's a good year if I buy more than 3 full priced games

gaming is endless slop, why the hell would i be buying more than 4 games a year, and even thats generous.

>>723775158 (OP)
Good games don't get released that frequently. Actual gamers play a game for several thousand hours before moving to the next.

>>723775158 (OP)
>economy going to shit so people don't have money
>data corrupted by phonefags who don't even play vidya
>most games for the past 10 years have been trash so people have been burned too many times
Then you add some bias to the way the data is collected and there you go

>>723780837
and, on top of it being a fuckhuge game, it's live service only.

I recently played UT99 and Flatout 2 at a LAN. Now I catch myself starting both games for a couple of quick bot matches nearly every day.
I haven't bought a new game in years by now. I think I have enough games to last me for several lifetimes.

I have only played one game released this year, Silksong. I didn't even buy it either, played it from my brothers steam library thanks to family sharing

>>723786897
>>723787001
ah still in your "it's fine" cope mode anons, good luck

>>723775583
wouldnt call those activities "playing"

>>723778490
sometimes I feel like only person on the street with zero debt

>>723775158 (OP)
It doesn't take long for a new game to become a not that new but on sale game, so we just wait it out. Also with every passing minute, the volume of good old games to serve as competition against good new games increases by default. The former is over 40 years worth of content, enough to crush the current output several times over no matter how well the quality could potentially be.

Somebody explain to me what's even the point for Bsky's continued existance now that they've banned any kind of porn (including sharing hornypost copypastas & ERP) on their website even sooner than X?

I honestly couldn't care less about the price itself so much. I pirate on PC and if I want a game and I know it's good I just buy it.

>>723789450
>Banned porn
Maybe explicit porn and onlyfans bitches. All the fetish artists I follow and risque big tittied anime girls are still there.

Unless you are a 3DPD fag, then that's on you.

>Ban on non-consensual depictions of porn
Oh, so rape shit. Or those retards that spam other accounts with how much they find them super hot and want to jerk off while picturing them in their fantasies?

I bought Kingdom Come 2 when it came out and No More Room in Hell 2 when there was a free weekeend in April. 234 hours in KDC2 and 171 hours in NMRIH2. So i only bought 2 games so far this year.

I buy like 1 new $60 game per year max. The rest are games on sale or cheaper indie games under $30. Can't afford more than that.

well sony only comes out with a movie game once every half-decade and the other 4% is probably switch owners buying actual unique video games

>>723775158 (OP)
>only 4% buy a new game more than 1/month
No shit? Who would spend $140 in a month on video games?

>>723775595
Four words to say "whales"

>>723776293
not when new games are $70, which is the point of the pic in OP

>>723775158 (OP)
Fuck buying games at full price.

>>723789450
Bsky is so fetch. #fetch

>>723775158 (OP)
what do they mean by "new"?
every game I buy is new to me, and I definitely buy more than one game a quarter on average
but if they mean "new AAA releases", then yeah I may only buy one in a year if I'm actually excited about it
which is pretty rare in these shit times

>>723775224
>11 replies
>nobody says it's because modern games are trash and there's too many games so everyone is playing older stuff
/v/ you're losing your touch

>>723775158 (OP)
I only buy one or two games a year because I have eyes and ears and know what I like.

>>723775158 (OP)
you know how much food 70$ buys you these days? not as much, and they want people to spend that on entertainment? maybe they should try making good games, first.

>>723778490
skill issue
>live beneath your means
>have no debt
damn that's crazy

>>723775158 (OP)
First of all, who is buying a "new" game every single month? Only the most mindless consoomer drone. Second of all, what does "new" even mean in that circumstance, because if it means it came out literally that month then that's idiotic. But then who's to say what counts as new? 3 months old? 6 months old? Third of all, we've been counting mobile """game""" ""players""" for years now in order to inflate numbers and lie to investors, so who even cares about these bullshit numbers? Overall, the premise is dumb and honestly 4% is higher than I would've guessed.

>>723775158 (OP)
Perhaps if they made good games, gamers would buy them? Maybe I'm just talking crazy.

dominions 6
dwarf forttress
thats life alright
you wouldnt get it
>buy

>>723788253
Im saying it's always at least a bit shitty
By design most people won't do well, a good portion of people will hold some cc debt. You either make good career decisions, personal decisions (like not associating yourself with people who'll sap your cash) and invest or you don't and suffer

>>723786805
>most muttmericans are piss broke
For assloads of those people, it's on their own choices. It's going to be funny in retrospect when we're asking "how did socialism become popular in the US" and the answer will be that the lowest 20% of Americans just continuously and stubbornly failed so hard in every conceivable way that they thought the system was doing this to them. Somehow the same system isn't making me broke and I make <70k.

>>723775158 (OP)
Maybe if games were enjoyable people would buy them more. Hell, would pirate them more.
Games haven't even been worth pirating in well over a decade now. I used to buy and pirate a lot, now I don't even know when the last time was that I did.
Everything is just shit now. Either gameplay is absent or dogshit, or the game has such hideously ugly characters that I couldn't bear looking at it for more than it takes to scroll past a screenshot of it here.

I never thought it possible, but I'm actually playing a fucking gacha nowadays because there's nothing else.

>>723775158 (OP)
There are barely any games to consider playing a year.

>>723796543
It seems that simple but no amount of the current crop could just "make good games" with all the time and money in the world. No amount of skilled millennials and zoomer devs could ever make a Silent Hill, Deus Ex, Devil May Cry, or Hitman: Blood Money. They couldn't even make a classic Doom as good.
There is simply a generational deficiency. The new devs just don't have the right stuff and they never will.

>>723775224
Its because they new generation is playing roblox, fortnight, and a series of free live service mobile games.

We are now witnessing the market switching over to the new and upcoming generation. Now, large studios have already pivoted to reflect that, think of all the bullshit loot box crap that has been added to your favorite online games. This is the first step to that.

We are getting ready to see the next step in the divide, less console releases overall, more emphasis on the largest demographic, the phone users.

>>723778490
It's fucking nuts. I want to get a 4090 to replace my 70, but I refuse to pay interest on it. So im patiently saving up enough to purchase it on credit, but with one of those scamming "no interest for X months" deals that are usually impossible to pay off unless you do a down payment

>>723775369
>>723775405
Why are americans like that?

>>723775224
just get a third job??

>>723781136
>>723781941
But multiplayer games are a staple of the medium and round up with other media like anime and comics all the time.

i dont buy games with mutts in them

>>723797826
How many people actually mainly play MP games or even as much as they play SP?
I only ever play online with real friends.

>>723775434
i hate rightoids

>you lived to see the vidya crash become real
amazing

I buy every game I want to play, money is no object. This year alone I've bought 3 games.

It's not about price, most games just aren't worth playing so they're not worth buying.

>>723775158 (OP)
I'm one of the 4% and I'm a NEET. a strange feeling