← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 723961515

23 posts 10 images /v/
Anonymous No.723961515 [Report] >>723961741 >>723961890
Microsoft pushing Xbox to hit profit margins of 30%
>Microsoft Corp. is asking its Xbox gaming division to produce profit margins that are well above the industry average, ratcheting up pressure on its video-game makers during a difficult time for the field at large.

>Over the past two years, executives at the Seattle-based software giant have set an across-the-board goal of 30% “accountability margins,” a term Microsoft uses in lieu of profit margins, according to people familiar with the business. The gaming division, which includes dozens of studios, has responded by canceling products, raising prices and slashing thousands of jobs, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing nonpublic information.

>The average profit margin in the video-game industry in recent years has ranged between 17% and 22%, according to estimates from S&P Global Market Intelligence, while coming in between 10% and 20% over the past six years at Xbox. Court documents from 2023 revealed that Microsoft’s gaming business had a 12% profit margin for the first nine months of the company’s 2022 fiscal year.

>The new goal, which hasn’t been previously reported, is at the outer range of what a gaming studio can typically reach in a boom year, said Neil Barbour, an analyst with S&P Global. “A 30% or better margin is usually reserved for a publisher that is really nailing it,” Barbour said.

>In the past, game makers at Xbox weren’t asked to hit specific numerical targets, said the people, and were largely told to focus on making the best games possible without worrying too much about finances. The new target was implemented in fall 2023 by Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood, whose team has taken a larger role in the gaming business in recent years.
Anonymous No.723961576 [Report]
>The change has impacted strategies under Microsoft gaming chief Phil Spencer as the division has looked for new ways to cut costs and boost profits. In 2024, Xbox announced that it would begin releasing the majority of its games on consoles from rivals Nintendo Co. and Sony Group Corp. for the first time. Earlier this year, Xbox decided to cancel a number of costly projects, including Everwild, Perfect Dark and Project Blackbird, all of which had been in development for more than seven years. Not every project is expected to hit the 30% profit threshold, said the people, but many Xbox developers and groups have been presented with the new target.

>Moving forward, games that are either cheap to make or deemed more likely to generate significant revenue windfalls may take priority over riskier bets, said the people, while Xbox’s floundering hardware division may face a significant rethinking. In a recent interview with Mashable, Xbox President Sarah Bond said the company’s next console will be “a very premium, very high-end curated experience,” suggesting a departure from previous Xbox iterations.
Anonymous No.723961713 [Report] >>723966152
this just means they want to fire people and choose studios. the unrealistic goals are just an excuse
Anonymous No.723961741 [Report] >>723961858 >>723961917 >>723962197 >>723962354 >>723963564 >>723968886 >>723971284
>>723961515 (OP)
What's even the point of hitting higher profit margins when you're already one of the largest companies in the world? Why not just pivot to staying competitive and turning a consistent profit with a high level of quality? Why do you need to grow more when just not shrinking relative to the rest of the market still means everyone can get their share of the value? Why not pivot to offering bigger dividends to shareholders? Why keep stringing them along with the promise that their investment will keep getting more valuable on paper?
Anonymous No.723961850 [Report]
Push to achieve higher profits after a string of decisions that will see quite a few people leave Xbox altogether.
Interesting strategy.
Anonymous No.723961858 [Report]
>>723961741
>What's even the point of hitting higher profit margins when you're already one of the largest companies in the world?
number must go up, it's corpo way.
Anonymous No.723961890 [Report] >>723969391
>>723961515 (OP)
Microsoft's basically telling the xbox division to go kill itself.
Anonymous No.723961917 [Report]
>>723961741
because shareholders be like
>give me money. money me. me a money needing a lot now
Anonymous No.723962197 [Report]
>>723961741
Why put money into xbox when you can put that money into cloudshit/AI for better returns? It's that simple.
Anonymous No.723962354 [Report]
>>723961741
Give money me give eat money me eat money give me eat money give me you.
Anonymous No.723962494 [Report]
Couldn't come at a worse time. Reminds me of Hifi rush, I imagine we'll be seeing that scenario repeat pretty soon
Anonymous No.723962525 [Report]
Xbox still exist?
Anonymous No.723962719 [Report]
Even Nintendo struggles to hit 30% with the wild success of the switch, what makes them think they can do that with Xbox?
Anonymous No.723963564 [Report] >>723965943 >>723969629
>>723961741
>What's even the point of hitting higher profit margins when you're already one of the largest companies in the world?
It is quite literally illegal to not pursue infinite growth (impossible BTW) thanks to an old court case between Ford (who liked the nazis and wanted to pay his staff more) and Dodge (literally star of david as their logo).
Anonymous No.723965943 [Report] >>723968613
>>723963564
Someone should contest that ruling, surely there will be a judge that changes the ruling, even if only to make their agenda pushing companies easier to survive
Anonymous No.723966152 [Report]
>>723961713
>choose
Anonymous No.723968613 [Report]
>>723965943
It would be more important to overturn Eldred v. Ashcroft (2003) and just generally roll back copyright to a sane <20 year duration.
This would naturally destabilize major publishing.
Anonymous No.723968886 [Report] >>723970037
>>723961741
CEO is a jeet. All jeets are turbo cattle who choke on shareholder balls 24/7. Reminder that not a singular jeet CEO has their own project in all those companies while white and asian CEOs did so shareholders hated them for "wasting money" for personal projects or pushing long term quality of life changes across the board. ALL companies with jeet CEOs went to dogshit.
Anonymous No.723969391 [Report]
>>723961890
It already got a head start by spending billions on stupid acquisitions. It's so fucking stupid, the XBOX division will die and Microsoft will just sit on all of those licenses until the sun burns out. Maybe shitting out an AI CoD game of once a year.
Anonymous No.723969629 [Report]
>>723963564
It's not illegal, it's mostly about doing shit without the shareholders' consent IIRC, the main problem was that Ford paid his shareholders less money to fund the rest of the company, but at the same time the Dodge brothers were using their dividends to help build up a rival car company, and the ruling was basically that the shareholders should have a say (rather than being completely ignored) but the director still has plenty of leeway in how to run the company.
Making a company public is a deal with the devil though.
Anonymous No.723970037 [Report] >>723970991
>>723968886
I genuinely don't understand how all these companies can get so obsessed with subscription models, slamming their products full of obstructive ads, and pricing based on the average consumer's assumed tolerance.

If you can sell something and turn a profit, and have nothing to continue maintaining on your end, that's a lot better than always being on the hook. But everyone wants to be Netflix, even if their products don't justify it. These people are constantly trying to outscale inflation, but they're the ones driving the debt crisis even higher by making it impossible for people to afford to pay down their debts, and even encouraging them to take out even more with shit like Klarna. It's counterproductive.

Putting a million ads that ruin the experience of a product and overwhelm a user anyway is also counterproductive. Your advertisers aren't getting their money's worth if the person being advertised to resents the fact that the ads are there, and just glosses over them out of fatigue. And they're all sharing that space with cheap ads for creepy bullshit and softcore porn.
They should charge advertisers more money to run many fewer ads. Not less to run more. That would fix most of the problems we have. People would probably stop bothering to install adblockers if it wasn't legitimately a nuisance not to have one.

And on top of all of that, the bottom 5-8% percent of the economy, the people doing a sizable amount of the work that actually keeps businesses like Walmart and Amazon actually functioning from day to day, are just totally squeezed out of having any disposable income at all, and their lives are essentially government subsidized, because they can't afford to live without it, which is also bad. It amounts to an active government subsidy on the largest and most profitable businesses. And that also means that market forces are very weak at the bottom, when that ought to be one of the healthiest levels of the economy for ideal performance.
Anonymous No.723970991 [Report]
>>723970037
The thing to understand is that the subscription model simply is not profitable and will never be profitable.
Even Netflix was working entirely off of the promise of their growing consumer base, not their real profit.
With a subscription service you can get big numbers and promise future profit with a quick "don't worry about it" before letting everyone in on the joke bail.
>that's a lot better than always being on the hook
All the bagholders in the subscription scheme are told that they won't be the ones on the hook and are sold on it because of everyone whom they are told will be on the hook. The model exists purely to seem like a good deal to the next guy.
>People would probably stop bothering to install adblockers if it wasn't legitimately a nuisance not to have one.
Ads are always a psychic attack on your person and should never be tolerated.
Anonymous No.723971284 [Report]
>>723961741
Sounds like they're ready the axe the whole gaming division and they're giving them a "do or die" big goal to try to hit if they want to stay around. It's unlikely they pull it off and the suits know it.