>>724075427
>freedom of expression
If every cog in a machine was free to do as it pleased with no connection to any other part of the whole, or not master part to set it all off or end the chain in, then it would no work at all.
Same goes for this, you need to actually have clear, set in stone positions of power within said workplace, even if its creative, in order to get what needs to be done, done. You can have "freedom of expression" within the bounds of what needs to be done, as in, let's say you're the lead artist, and the director tells you what they sort of envision the main character to look like, they might give you some physical description, or their traits and personality, then you're free to draw it as you imagine it based on that criteria. If the Director doesn't quite like it yet then asks you to change some things, you, again, do have the freedom of expression there , but within the bounds of the rules you've been set to.
I'm sorry, but not even the creative feeling is 100% "free" unless you're literally the one in charge of everything, and, in some way, not even then are you truly "free" since you're still technically constrained by the other workers within said studio likely not being able to deliver your exact 'ideal' vision you had in mind of something, but just something closed enough to it that came in existence from your input first, but then through their own free expression in the end.
